Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 6 , Pages 1938-1950 , June 2006

Comparing the Fatty Acid Composition of Organic and Conventional Milk

  • K.A. Ellis

      Affiliations

    • Division of Animal Production and Public Health, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • G. Innocent

      Affiliations

    • Division of Animal Production and Public Health, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
  • ,
  • D. Grove-White

      Affiliations

    • Division of Livestock Health and Welfare, University of Liverpool, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leahurst, Neston, CH64 7TE, UK
  • ,
  • P. Cripps

      Affiliations

    • Division of Livestock Health and Welfare, University of Liverpool, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Leahurst, Neston, CH64 7TE, UK
  • ,
  • W.G. McLean

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics School of Biomedical Sciences, Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L69 3GE, UK
  • ,
  • C.V. Howard

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Molecular Biosciences, University of Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, BT52 1SA, UK
  • ,
  • M. Mihm

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cell Sciences, Institute of Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow Veterinary School, Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK

Received 23 September 2005 ,Accepted 20 December 2005.

  • Image Result

    a) Percentages of saturated fatty acids (SFA); b) ratio of polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) to monounsaturated FA (MUFA); c) percentages of n-3 FA; d) percentages of n-6 FA; e) ratio of n-6:n-3 FA; f) percen

    a) Percentages of saturated fatty acids (SFA); b) ratio of polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) to monounsaturated FA (MUFA); c) percentages of n-3 FA; d) percentages of n-6 FA; e) ratio of n-6:n-3 FA; f) percentage of vaccenic acid; and g) percentage of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in organic (▴) and conventional (■) milk each month for the 12-mo study (where month 5=May 2003 and month 4=April 2004). Mean values are taken across all farms of each type.

  • Image Result
    Effects of breed type and farm system type from model 1 on mean milk n-3 fatty acid (FA) proportion; C1=conventional pedigree Holstein, C2=conventional Holstein-Friesian, C4=conventional mixed breed,

    Effects of breed type and farm system type from model 1 on mean milk n-3 fatty acid (FA) proportion; C1=conventional pedigree Holstein, C2=conventional Holstein-Friesian, C4=conventional mixed breed, O1=organic pedigree Holstein, O2=organic Holstein-Friesian, O3=organic Friesian, and O4=organic mixed breed (there were no conventional Friesian farms). Dashed line represents mean overall proportion of n-3 FA in all milk samples.

  • Image Result
    Effects of herd-yield quartile and farm system type from model 2 on mean milk n-3 fatty acid (FA) proportion (C=conventional, O=organic, 1 to 4=lowest to highest herd average yield quartile). Dashed l

    Effects of herd-yield quartile and farm system type from model 2 on mean milk n-3 fatty acid (FA) proportion (C=conventional, O=organic, 1 to 4=lowest to highest herd average yield quartile). Dashed line represents mean overall proportion of n-3 FA in all milk samples.

PII: S0022-0302(06)72261-5

doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72261-5

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 6 , Pages 1938-1950 , June 2006