« Previous
Next »
Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 9
, Pages
3360-3374
, September 2006
Pregnancy, Bovine Somatotropin, and Dietary n-3 Fatty Acids in Lactating Dairy Cows: I. Ovarian, Conceptus, and Growth Hormone–Insulin-Like Growth Factor System Responses
-
Regression analysis (third-order curves) of daily milk production starting 10 DIM until the start of bST treatment and timed AI for cows fed either 0 (least squares means: ■) or 1.9% (least squares me
Regression analysis (third-order curves) of daily milk production starting 10 DIM until the start of bST treatment and timed AI for cows fed either 0 (least squares means: ■) or 1.9% (least squares means:□) calcium salt of fish oil-enriched lipid diets. Pattern of regression curves differed (P
<
0.01). Regression equations: 1.9% Fish Oil: ŷ = 13.12 + 0.923x
−
0.0117x2 + 0.000045x3; 0% Fish Oil: ŷ = 16.51 + 0.808x
−
0.0137x2 + 0.000085x3,
; where ŷ = milk production and x = DIM. -
Linear regression of plasma insulin concentrations for cows fed fish oil-enriched lipid (FO) at 0 (least squares means: ■) or 1.9% (least squares means: □) of dietary DM from 14 to 53 DIM. Feeding FOLinear regression of plasma insulin concentrations for cows fed fish oil-enriched lipid (FO) at 0 (least squares means: ■) or 1.9% (least squares means: □) of dietary DM from 14 to 53 DIM. Feeding FO decreased (P
<
0.01) plasma insulin concentrations compared with control cows in relation to DIM. Regression equations: 0% Fish Oil: ŷ = 0.56 + 0.011x; 1.9% Fish Oil: ŷ = 0.75 + 0.0012x,
; where ŷ = insulin concentration and x = DIM. -
Regression analysis (second-order curves) of daily milk production from d 0 to 17 of a synchronized estrous cycle (d 0) for cyclic and pregnant cows fed the control diet and injected with bST (least sRegression analysis (second-order curves) of daily milk production from d 0 to 17 of a synchronized estrous cycle (d 0) for cyclic and pregnant cows fed the control diet and injected with bST (least squares means:□) or not (least squares means: ■) on d 0 and 11. Pattern of regression curves differed (P
<
0.01). Regression equation: bST: ŷ = 33.30
−
0.125x
−
0.0029x2; no bST: ŷ = 37.05 + 0.281x −0.0118x2; ŷ = milk production and x = days after GnRH (estrus). -
Concentrations of plasma progesterone of cyclic and pregnant cows not given bST (n = 10; □) and those given bST (n = 11; ▴) collected from d 0 to 17 of a synchronized estrous cycle differed (P<0.05Concentrations of plasma progesterone of cyclic and pregnant cows not given bST (n = 10; □) and those given bST (n = 11; ▴) collected from d 0 to 17 of a synchronized estrous cycle differed (P
<
0.05). All cows were fed the control diet. Concentrations of progesterone at days designated differed: *P
<
0.10; **P
<
0.05. -
Profiles of plasma growth hormone (GH) concentrations of cyclic cows fed control diet (no bST; △), cyclic cows fed control diet with bST injections (▴), cyclic cows fed FO (---×---), cyclic cows fed FProfiles of plasma growth hormone (GH) concentrations of cyclic cows fed control diet (no bST; △), cyclic cows fed control diet with bST injections (▴), cyclic cows fed FO (---×---), cyclic cows fed FO with bST injections (---○---), pregnant cows fed control diet (no bST; □), and pregnant cows fed control diet with bST injections (■) from d 0 to 17 of a synchronized estrous cycle. All 3 groups of cows given bST had greater mean GH concentrations than cows not injected with bST (P
<
0.01). Of those given bST, cows fed FO and pregnant cows had greater (P
<
0.05) mean GH concentrations than cyclic cows fed the control diet. Pooled standard errors for bST-treated cows = 3.31 and non-bST-treated cows = 1.13. -
Profiles of plasma IGF-I concentrations of cyclic cows fed control diet (no bST; △), cyclic cows fed control diet with bST injections (▴), cyclic cows fed FO (---×---), cyclic cows fed FO with bST injProfiles of plasma IGF-I concentrations of cyclic cows fed control diet (no bST; △), cyclic cows fed control diet with bST injections (▴), cyclic cows fed FO (---×---), cyclic cows fed FO with bST injections (---○---), pregnant cows fed control diet (no bST; □), and pregnant cows fed control diet with bST injections (■) from d 0 to 17 of a synchronized estrous cycle. All 3 groups of cows given bST had greater (P
<
0.01) mean IGF-I concentrations than cows not injected with bST. The FO-fed cows injected with bST had lower (P
<
0.05) IGF-I plasma concentrations and pregnant cows injected with bST had greater (P
<
0.05) IGF-I plasma concentrations than cyclic cows fed the control diet with bST injections as detected by homogeneity of regression. Pooled standard errors for bST-treated cows = 29.9 and non-bST-treated cows = 22.2.
PII: S0022-0302(06)72373-6
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72373-6
© 2006 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 9
, Pages
3360-3374
, September 2006


