Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 12 , Pages 4511-4519 , December 2006

Relation Between Consumers’ Perceptions of Color and Texture of Dairy Desserts and Instrumental Measurements Using a Generalized Procrustes Analysis

Received 8 May 2006 ,Accepted 20 July 2006.

References 

  1. Chung SJ, Heymann H, Grün IU. Application of GPA and PLSR in correlating sensory and chemical data sets. Food Qual. Pref. 2003;14:485–495
  2. Depypere F, Verbeken D, Thas O, Dewettinck K. Mixture design approach on the dynamic rheological and uniaxial compression behaviour of milk desserts. Food Hydrocoll. 2003;17:311–320
  3. De Wijk RA, Van Gemert LJ, Terpstra MEJ, Wilkinson CL. Texture of semi-solids: Sensory and instrumental measurements on vanilla custard desserts. Food Qual. Pref. 2003;14:305–307
  4. Dijksterhuis G. Multivariate data analysis in sensory and consumer science: An overview of developments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1995;6:206–211
  5. Dijksterhuis G. Procrustes analysis in studying sensory–instrumental relations. Food Qual. Pref. 1994;5:115–120
  6. Dolz M, González F, Delegido J, Hernández MJ, Pellicer J. A time-dependent expression for thixotropic areas. Application to aerosil 100 hydrogels. J. Pharm. Sci. 2000;89:790–797
  7. Elmore JR, Heymann H, Johnson J, Hewett JE. Preference mapping: Relating acceptance of “creaminess” to a descriptive sensory map of a semi-solid. Food Qual. Pref. 1999;10:465–475
  8. Faller JY, Klein BP, Faller JF. Characterisation of corn–soy breakfast cereals by generalized Procrustes analyses. Cereal Chem. 1998;75:904–908
  9. Gains N. The repertory grid approach. In:  Macfie HJH,  Thomson DMH editor. Measurement of Food Preferences. Glasgow, UK: Blackie Academic & Professional; 1994;p. 51–76
  10. Gomez C, Fiorenza F, Izquierdo L, Costell E. Perception of mealiness in apples: A comparison of consumers and trained assessors. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. A. 1998;207:304–310
  11. González-Tomás L, Costell E. Sensory evaluation of vanilla dairy desserts by free choice profile. J. Sens. Stud. 2006;21:20–33
  12. Hersleth M, Berggren F, Martens M. Perception of bread: A comparison of consumers and trained asssessors. J. Food Sci. 2005;70:95–101
  13. Jack FR, Piggott JR. Free choice profiling in consumer research. Food Qual. Pref. 1992;3:129–134
  14. Jahan K, Paterson A, Piggott JR. Sensory quality in retailed organic, free range and corn-fed chicken breast. Food Res. Int. 2005;38:495–503
  15. Le Fur Y, Mercurio V, Moio L, Blanquet J, Meunier JM. A new approach to examine the relationships between sensory and gas chromatography–olfactometry data using generalized Procrustes analysis applied to six French Chardonnay wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51:443–452
  16. Lethuaut L, Brossard C, Meynier A, Rousseau F, Llamas G, Bousseau B, et al. Sweetness and aroma perceptions in dairy desserts varying in sucrose and aroma levels and in textural agent. Int. Dairy J. 2005;15:485–493
  17. Lethuaut L, Brossard C, Rousseau F, Bousseau B, Genot C. Sweetness–texture interactions in model dairy desserts: Effect of sucrose concentration and the carrageenan type. Int. Dairy J. 2003;13:631–641
  18. Nunes MC, Batista P, Raymundo A, Alves MM, Sousa I. Vegetable proteins and milk puddings. Colloids Surf. B Biointerf. 2003;31:21–29
  19. Oreskovich DC, Klein BP, Sutherland JW. Procrustes analysis and its application to free choice and other sensory profiling. In:  Lawless HT,  Klein BP editor. Sensory Science Theory and Application in Foods. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1991;p. 353–394
  20. Piggott JR, Sheen MR, Apostolidou SG. Consumers’ perceptions of whiskies and other alcoholic beverages. Food Qual. Pref. 1990;2:177–185
  21. Shama F, Sherman P. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity II. Oral methods. J. Texture Stud. 1973;4:111–118
  22. Tárrega A, Durán L, Costell E. Flow behaviour of semi-solid dairy desserts. Effect of temperature. Int. Dairy J. 2004;14:345–353
  23. Tárrega A, Durán L, Costell E. Rheological characterization of semisolid dairy desserts. Effect of temperature. Food Hydrocoll. 2005;19:133–139
  24. Tárrega A, Costell E. Effect of composition on the rheological behaviour and sensory properties of semisolid dairy dessert. Food Hydrocoll. 2006;20:914–922
  25. Vélez-Ruiz JF, González-Tomás L, Costell E. Rheology of dairy custard model systems: Influence of milk-fat and hydrocolloid type. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005;221:342–347
  26. Verbeken D, Bael K, Thas O, Dewettinck K. Interactions between κ-carrageenan, milk proteins and modified starch in sterilized dairy desserts. Int. Dairy J. 2006;16:482–488
  27. Verbeken D, Thas O, Dewettinck K. Textural properties of gelled dairy desserts containing κ-carrageenan and starch. Food Hydrocoll. 2004;18:817–823
  28. Weenen H, Jellema RH, De Wijk RA. Sensory sub-attributes of creamy mouthfeel in commercial mayonnaises, custard desserts and sauces. Food Qual. Pref. 2005;16:163–170

PII: S0022-0302(06)72499-7

doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72499-7

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 12 , Pages 4511-4519 , December 2006