Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 8 , Pages 2817-2832, August 2006

Calibration of Infrared Milk Analyzers: Modified Milk Versus Producer Milk1

  • K.E. Kaylegian

      Affiliations

    • Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center Department of Food Science, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
  • ,
  • G.E. Houghton

      Affiliations

    • Kestrel Software Consulting, Berkshire, NY 13736
  • ,
  • J.M. Lynch

      Affiliations

    • Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center Department of Food Science, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
  • ,
  • J.R. Fleming

      Affiliations

    • USDA, Agricultural Marketing Service, Texas Milk Marketing Area, P. O. Box 110939 Carrollton 75011
  • ,
  • D.M. Barbano

      Affiliations

    • Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center Department of Food Science, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 2 October 2005; accepted 4 January 2006.

Abstract 

Mid-infrared (MIR) milk analyzers are traditionally calibrated using sets of preserved raw individual producer milk samples. The goal of this study was to determine if the use of sets of preserved pasteurized modified milks improved calibration performance of MIR milk analyzers compared with calibration sets of producer milks. The preserved pasteurized modified milk sets exhibited more consistent day-to-day and set-to-set calibration slope and intercept values for all components compared with the preserved raw producer milk calibration sets. Pasteurized modified milk calibration samples achieved smaller confidence interval (CI) around the regression line (i.e., calibration uncertainty). Use of modified milk calibration sets with a larger component range, more even distribution of component concentrations within the ranges, and the lower correlation of fat and protein concentrations than producer milk calibration sets produced a smaller 95% CI for the regression line due to the elimination of moderate and high leverage samples. The CI for the producer calibration sets were about 2 to 12 times greater than the CI for the modified milk calibration sets, depending on the component. Modified milk calibration samples have the potential to produce MIR milk analyzer calibrations that will perform better in validation checks than producer milk-based calibrations by reducing the mean difference and standard deviation of the difference between instrument values and reference chemistry.

Key words: infrared milk analyzer, calibration, modified milk

 

PII: S0022-0302(06)72555-3

doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72555-3

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 89, Issue 8 , Pages 2817-2832, August 2006