Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 90, Issue 9 , Pages 4022-4032 , September 2007

Invited Review: New Perspectives on the Roles of Nutrition and Metabolic Priorities in the Subfertility of High-Producing Dairy Cows1

  • L.M. Chagas

      Affiliations

    • Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • J.J. Bass

      Affiliations

    • Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1003, New Zealand
  • ,
  • D. Blache

      Affiliations

    • The School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 37 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia
  • ,
  • C.R. Burke

      Affiliations

    • Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
  • ,
  • J.K. Kay

      Affiliations

    • Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
  • ,
  • D.R. Lindsay

      Affiliations

    • The School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 37 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia
  • ,
  • M.C. Lucy

      Affiliations

    • Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
  • ,
  • G.B. Martin

      Affiliations

    • The School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 37 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Australia
  • ,
  • S. Meier

      Affiliations

    • Dexcel, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand
  • ,
  • F.M. Rhodes

      Affiliations

    • 21 Scotsman Valley Road, Hamilton, New Zealand
  • ,
  • J.R. Roche

      Affiliations

    • University of Tasmania, PO Box 3523, Burnie, Tasmania, Australia 7320
  • ,
  • W.W. Thatcher

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610
  • ,
  • R. Webb

      Affiliations

    • University of Nottingham, Division of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom

Received 18 December 2006 ,Accepted 2 May 2007.

  • Image Result

    Proposed “ideal body condition score profile” for dairy cows to minimize the effect of energy balance on reproductive failure. Body condition score is presented for the 5–, 8–, and 10–point scales.

    Proposed “ideal body condition score profile” for dairy cows to minimize the effect of energy balance on reproductive failure. Body condition score is presented for the 5–, 8–, and 10–point scales.

  • Image Result

    The feedback-regulated systems that control the reproductive axis (shaded area A) and the somatotropic axis (shaded area B) interact at several levels and thus link nutritional and metabolic inputs in

    The feedback-regulated systems that control the reproductive axis (shaded area A) and the somatotropic axis (shaded area B) interact at several levels and thus link nutritional and metabolic inputs into the reproductive process. Note that for the reproductive axis, FSH is omitted because it does not appear to limit dairy cow fertility. In addition, for the sake of clarity, the thyroid and adrenocortical axes have been omitted: they are both regulated by their own feedback loops in the brain-pituitary system, both are intimately linked with lactation, both respond to metabolic inputs, and both affect the reproductive and somatotropic systems, so they introduce inputs from stressors such as high ambient temperature, disease, and the antagonistic interactions associated with establishment of social dominance. With respect to sex-steroid feedback, positive feedback for induction of the preovulatory surge has been omitted.

PII: S0022-0302(07)71859-3

doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-852

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 90, Issue 9 , Pages 4022-4032 , September 2007