Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 90, Issue 11 , Pages 4925-4937 , November 2007

Invited Review: Sensory Analysis of Dairy Foods

Received 2 May 2007 ,Accepted 25 June 2007.

  • Image Result

    Descriptive sensory profiles provided by a trained descriptive panel for the 2 skim milk powders (SMP) within 1 mo of production. Both products received the same grade (US Extra) from a licensed USDA

    Descriptive sensory profiles provided by a trained descriptive panel for the 2 skim milk powders (SMP) within 1 mo of production. Both products received the same grade (US Extra) from a licensed USDA grader. Flavor intensity was scored on a 15-point universal intensity scale. Most dairy flavors fall between 0 and 4 (Drake, 2004).

  • Image Result
    Principal component (PC) biplot of descriptive analysis of whey proteins (PC1 and PC2). Percentage following PC explains amount of variability depicted by each PC on each axis. WPC = whey protein conc

    Principal component (PC) biplot of descriptive analysis of whey proteins (PC1 and PC2). Percentage following PC explains amount of variability depicted by each PC on each axis. WPC = whey protein concentrate; WPI = whey protein isolate. Taken from Russell et al. (2006). Reproduced with permission from Wiley Blackwell.

  • Image Result
    Principal component (PC) plot of descriptive texture attributes of Gouda cheeses. Numbers represent cheeses. Cheeses 1, 16, 17, and 18 are cheeses with reduced-fat contents. Taken from Yates and Drake

    Principal component (PC) plot of descriptive texture attributes of Gouda cheeses. Numbers represent cheeses. Cheeses 1, 16, 17, and 18 are cheeses with reduced-fat contents. Taken from Yates and Drake (2007). Reproduced with permission from Wiley Blackwell.

  • Image Result
    Overall acceptability scores for 6 butters (P16, P21, P23, P24, P25, P27) and 2 spreads (P28, P29) within different identified consumer segments. Taken from Krause et al. (2007).

    Overall acceptability scores for 6 butters (P16, P21, P23, P24, P25, P27) and 2 spreads (P28, P29) within different identified consumer segments. Taken from Krause et al. (2007).

PII: S0022-0302(07)71960-4

doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0332

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 90, Issue 11 , Pages 4925-4937 , November 2007