Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 91, Issue 10 , Pages 3744-3760 , October 2008

Development and Optimization of a Carbon Dioxide-Aided Cold Microfiltration Process for the Physical Removal of Microorganisms and Somatic Cells from Skim Milk

Received 27 November 2007 ,Accepted 29 May 2008.

References 

  1. AOAC. Official method 991.20: Nitrogen (total) in milk. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed.. Washington, DC: AOAC International; 2003;
  2. Azevedo NF, Pinto AR, Reis NM, Vieira MJ, Keevil CW. Shear stress, temperature, and inoculation concentration influence the adhesion of water-stressed Helicobacter pylori to stainless steel 304 and polypropylene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:2936–2941
  3. Azzara CD, Dimick PS. Lipoprotein lipase activity of milk from cows with prolonged subclinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1985;68:3171–3175
  4. Brans G, Schroën CGPH, van der Sman RGM, Boom RM. Membrane fractionation of milk: State of the art and challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2004;243:263–272
  5. Cousin MA. Presence and activity of psychrotrophic bacteria microorganisms in milk and dairy products: A review. J. Food Prot. 1982;45:172–207
  6. Elwell MW, Barbano DM. Use of microfiltration to improve fluid milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89(E Suppl.):E10–E30
  7. Field RW, Wu D, Howell JA, Gupta BB. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995;100:259–272
  8. Gilbert P, Allison DG, McBain AJ. Biofilms in vitro and in vivo: Do singular mechanisms imply cross-resistance? J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002;92:98S–110S
  9. Guerra A, Jonsson G, Ramussen A, Waagner EN, Edelsten D. Low cross-flow velocity microfiltration of skim milk for removal of bacterial spores. Int. Dairy J. 1997;7:849–861
  10. Howell JA. Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995;107:165–171
  11. Hyde MF. Physiology of thermophilic bacilli from dairy processing facilities, with particular reference to temperature. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales; 2002;PhD Thesis
  12. Kochkodan VM, Hilal N, Goncharuk VV, Al-Khatib L, Levadna TI. Effect of the surface modification of polymer membranes on their microbiological fouling. Colloid J. 2006;68:267–273
  13. Law BA. Reviews of the progress of dairy science: Enzymes of psychrotrophic bacteria and their effects on milk and milk products. J. Dairy Res. 1979;46:573–593
  14. Lynch JM, Barbano DM, Fleming JR. Indirect and direct determination of the casein content of milk by Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis: Collaborative study. J. AOAC. 1998;81:763–774
  15. Ma H, Hakim LF, Bowman CN, Davis RH. Factors affecting membrane fouling reduction by surface modification and backpulsing. J. Membr. Sci. 2001;189:255–270
  16. Murphy PM, Lynch D, Kelly PM. Growthofthermophilic spore forming bacilli in milk during the manufacture of low heat powders. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 1999;52:45–50
  17. Pafylias I, Cheryan M, Mehaia MA, Saglam N. Microfiltration of milk with ceramic membranes. Food Res. Int. 1996;29:141–146
  18. Parkar SG, Flint SH, Palmer JS, Brooks JD. Factors influencing attachment of thermophilic bacilli to stainless steel. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001;90:901–908
  19. Saboya LV, Maubois J-L. Current developments of microfiltration technology in the dairy industry. Lait. 2000;80:541–553
  20. Scott SA, Brooks JD, Rakonjac J, Walter KMR. The formation of thermophilic spores during the manufacture of whole milk powder. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2007;60:109–117
  21. Verdi RJ, Barbano DM. Preliminary investigation of the properties of somatic cell proteases. J. Dairy Sci. 1988;71:534–538

PII: S0022-0302(08)71000-2

doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0899

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 91, Issue 10 , Pages 3744-3760 , October 2008