Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 91, Issue 9 , Pages 3291-3299 , September 2008

A Conjugated Linoleic Acid Supplement Containing Trans-10, Cis-12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid Reduces Milk Fat Synthesis in Lactating Goats1

  • A.L. Lock

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Science, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405
  • ,
  • M. Rovai

      Affiliations

    • E (Kika) de la Garza American Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK 73050
  • ,
  • T.A. Gipson

      Affiliations

    • E (Kika) de la Garza American Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK 73050
  • ,
  • M.J. de Veth

      Affiliations

    • BASF AG, Nutrition Research Station, Neumuehle 13, 76877, Offenbach/Queich, Germany
    • Present address: Balchem Corporation, New Hampton, NY 10958.
  • ,
  • D.E. Bauman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 1 February 2008 ,Accepted 9 May 2008.

  • Image Result

    Temporal pattern of (A) milk yield, (B) milk protein percentage, and (C) milk lactose percentage of lactating goats un-supplemented (control; ■) or supplemented with lipid-encapsulated conjugated lino

    Temporal pattern of (A) milk yield, (B) milk protein percentage, and (C) milk lactose percentage of lactating goats un-supplemented (control; ■) or supplemented with lipid-encapsulated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at a low dose (CLA-1; △) and a high dose (CLA-2; ×). Values represent means from 30 does; SEM = 85 g/d, 0.04%, and 0.04% for milk yield, milk protein percentage, and milk lactose percentage, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Temporal pattern of (A) milk fat percentage and (B) milk fat yield of lactating goats unsupplemented (control; □) or supplemented with lipid-encapsulated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at a low dose (

    Temporal pattern of (A) milk fat percentage and (B) milk fat yield of lactating goats unsupplemented (control; □) or supplemented with lipid-encapsulated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at a low dose (CLA-1; △) and a high dose (CLA-2; ×). Values represent means from 30 does; SEM = 0.06% and 5.0 g/d for milk fat percentage and milk fat yield, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Milk fatty acid yield (mmol/d) in goats (n = 30) that were unsupplemented (control; black bars) or supplemented with lipid-encapsulated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at a low (CLA-1; open bars) and a

    Milk fatty acid yield (mmol/d) in goats (n = 30) that were unsupplemented (control; black bars) or supplemented with lipid-encapsulated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at a low (CLA-1; open bars) and a high dose (CLA-2; cross-hatched bars). Values for individual fatty acids were calculated using milk fat yield treatment means for d 11 to 14 and milk fatty acid composition from d 14 of treatment. Fatty acids are categorized according to origin; <C16 represent de novo synthesized fatty acids, >C16 represent preformed fatty acids taken up from circulation, and C16 fatty acids are derived from both sources. Standard error is indicated by error bars over each column. a-cWithin each fatty acid source, treatment effects with significance differences are indicated by letters over the columns (P<0.001 for all).

PII: S0022-0302(08)71044-0

doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1071

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 91, Issue 9 , Pages 3291-3299 , September 2008