Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 91, Issue 1 , Pages 85-90, January 2008

Effect of Prepartum Photoperiod on Milk Production and Prolactin Concentration of Dairy Ewes

  • C.M. Mikolayunas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • D.L. Thomas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison 53706
  • ,
  • G.E. Dahl

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
    • Current address: Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
  • ,
  • T.F. Gressley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
    • Current address: Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark 19716.
  • ,
  • Y.M. Berger

      Affiliations

    • Spooner Agricultural Research Station, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Spooner 54801

Received 7 August 2007; accepted 28 May 2008.

Abstract 

Long photoperiods during established lactation increase milk production in dairy cattle and dairy sheep, but recent research in cattle and dairy goats suggests an additional influence of prepartum day length on milk yield in the subsequent lactation. The proposed mechanism of function is the level and role of circulating prolactin in mammary development. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of prepartum photoperiod on milk production, milk composition, and prolactin concentration of 22 multiparous dairy ewes exposed to short day prepartum photoperiod (SDPP; 8h of light:16h of dark) or long day prepartum photoperiod (LDPP; 16h of light:8h of dark) for at least 6 wk prepartum. During the first 8 wk of lactation, SDPP ewes tended to produce more milk than LDPP ewes (2.43 vs. 2.29 kg/d, respectively), and the milk of SDPP ewes had a greater fat percentage than that of LDPP ewes (6.04 vs. 5.51%, respectively). Due to daily milk yield and greater fat content, SDPP ewes produced more 6.5% fat-corrected milk (+0.30±0.08 kg/d) and 6.5% fat- and 5.8% protein-corrected milk (+0.28±0.08 kg/d) than LDPP ewes. For the lactation period of 180 d, SDPP ewes produced more test day milk than LDPP ewes (1.76 vs. 1.60±0.05 kg/d, respectively), but there were no differences in milk fat or protein percentages. Ewes in both treatments experienced a prolactin surge at lambing, but SDPP ewes had lower circulating prolactin concentration than LDPP ewes from 4 to 0.5 wk before lambing (14.7 vs. 51.3±4.2 mg/dL, respectively). These data suggest that decreased prepartum photoperiod may be important for increasing milk production in dairy ewes and may provide a management strategy for dairy sheep producers to increase milk yield.

Key words: dairy sheep, milk yield, photoperiod, prolactin

 

PII: S0022-0302(08)71440-1

doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0586

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 91, Issue 1 , Pages 85-90, January 2008