Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 95-99 , January 2009

Technical note: Characterizing individual milk fat globules with holographic video microscopy

Received 13 May 2008 ,Accepted 4 September 2008.

  • Image Result

    Schematic representation of holographic video microscopy. The sample scatters light from a collimated laser beam. Both the scattered and unscattered laser light are collected by an oil-immersion objec

    Schematic representation of holographic video microscopy. The sample scatters light from a collimated laser beam. Both the scattered and unscattered laser light are collected by an oil-immersion objective lens and relayed to a video camera, which records their interference as a hologram. A typical example of one fat droplet's hologram is shown to the right, together with a fit to equations . N.A. = numerical aperture.

  • Image Result
    Histograms of (a) fat droplet radii and (b) refractive indexes obtained from single-droplet characterization measurements.

    Histograms of (a) fat droplet radii and (b) refractive indexes obtained from single-droplet characterization measurements.

  • Image Result
    Scatter plot of refractive index and globule radius a for commercial milk samples. Each data point represents results for a single fat droplet. Error bars are computed from the normalized covariance m

    Scatter plot of refractive index and globule radius a for commercial milk samples. Each data point represents results for a single fat droplet. Error bars are computed from the normalized covariance matrix of the fitting parameters. Histograms at the top and side show the number-weighted distribution of values of the radius and refractive index, respectively.

  • Image Result
    Refractive index versus droplet radius, a, for dispersed Type B immersion oil in water, both with (squares) and without (circles) surfactant.

    Refractive index versus droplet radius, a, for dispersed Type B immersion oil in water, both with (squares) and without (circles) surfactant.

PII: S0022-0302(09)70313-3

doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1361

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 95-99 , January 2009