Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 2 , Pages 433-443 , February 2009

Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges

  • B.J. Hayes

      Affiliations

    • Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora 3083, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • P.J. Bowman

      Affiliations

    • Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora 3083, Australia
    • ,
  • A.J. Chamberlain

      Affiliations

    • Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora 3083, Australia
    • ,
  • M.E. Goddard

      Affiliations

    • Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora 3083, Australia
    • Faculty of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia

Received 21 August 2008 ,Accepted 2 October 2008.

References 

  1. Boichard D, Fritz S, Rossignol MN, Boscher MY, Malafosse A, Colleau JJ. Implementation of marker-assisted selection in French dairy cattle. Electronic commun. In: Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod.. Montpellier, France. 2002;22-03
  2. Calus MP, Meuwissen TH, de Roos AP, Veerkamp RF. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics. 2008;178:553–561
  3. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007;124:369–376
  4. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman R, Goddard ME. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics. 2008;179:1503–1512
  5. Dunner S, Miranda ME, Amigues Y, Cañón J, Georges M, Hanset R, et al. Haplotype diversity of the myostatin gene among beef cattle breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2003;35:103–118
  6. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. Ann. Statist. 2004;32:407–499
  7. Gianola D, Fernando RL, Stella A. Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics. 2006;173:1761–1776
  8. Gibson JP. Short-term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection of identified loci. In: Proc. 5th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 21. 1994;p. 202–204
  9. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R. ASReml User Guide Release 1.0. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International Ltd; 2002;
  10. Goddard ME. Mapping genes for quantitative traits using linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1991;23(Suppl):131s–134s
  11. Goddard ME. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica. 2008;doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0
  12. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Genomic selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007;124:323–330
  13. Grisart B, Farnir F, Karim L, Cambisano N, Kim J-J, Kvasz A, et al. Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;24:2398–2403
  14. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics. 2007;177:2389–2397
  15. Harris BL, Johnson DL, Spelman RJ. Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation. In: Proc Interbull Meeting, Niagara Falls. Canada. 2008;
  16. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2001;33:209–229
  17. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Technical note: Prediction of breeding values using marker derived relationship matrices. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86:2089–2092
  18. Hill WG. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res. 1981;38:209–216
  19. Legarra A, Misztal I. Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:360–366
  20. Lillehammer M, Goddard ME, Nilsen H, Sehested E, Olsen HG, Lien S, et al. Quantitative trait locus-by-environment interaction for milk yield traits on Bos taurus autosome 6. Genetics. 2008;179:1539–1546
  21. Meuwissen TH, Goddard ME. Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2004;36:261–279
  22. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819–1829
  23. Muir WM. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2007;124:342–355
  24. Piyasatian N, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection for composite line development using low density marker maps. In: Proc. 8th World. Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest Prod. Belo Horizonte, Brazil. 2006;
  25. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA, Donnelly P. Association mapping in structured populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2000;67:170–181
  26. Sanna S, Jackson AU, Nagaraja R, Willer CJ, Chen WM, Bonnycastle LL, et al. Common variants in the GDF5-UQCC region are associated with variation in human height. Nat. Genet. 2008;40:198–203
  27. Schaeffer LR. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2006;123:218–223
  28. Scheet P, Stephens MA. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: Applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006;78:629–644
  29. Shrimpton AE, Robertson A. The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections. Genetics. 1988;118:445–459
  30. Smith C. Improvement of metric traits through specific genetic loci. Anim. Prod. 1967;9:349–358
  31. Soller M, Beckmann JS. Genetic polymorphism in variety identification and genetic improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1983;67:25–33
  32. Spelman RJ, Ford CA, McElhinney P, Gregory GC, Snell RG. Characterization of the DGAT1 gene in the New Zealand dairy population. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:3514–3517
  33. Tsuruta S, Misztal I. Technical note: Computing options for genetic evaluation with a large number of genetic markers. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86:1514–1518
  34. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, et al. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:16–24
  35. Wray NR, Goddard ME. Increasing long term response to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1994;26:431–451
  36. Xu S. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics. 2003;163:789–801
  37. Xu S, Jia Z. Genome-wide analysis of epistatic effects for quantitative traits in barley. Genetics. 2007;175:1955–1963

PII: S0022-0302(09)70347-9

doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1646

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 2 , Pages 433-443 , February 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution