Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 6 , Pages 2382-2388 , June 2009

Rapid detection of Salmonella in milk by combined immunomagnetic separation-polymerase chain reaction assay

  • B. Mercanoglu Taban

      Affiliations

    • Gazi University, Vocational School of Health Services, Golbasi, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • U. Ben

      Affiliations

    • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Engineering, Food Engineering Department, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • S.A. Aytac

      Affiliations

    • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Engineering, Food Engineering Department, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey

Received 8 July 2008 ,Accepted 10 February 2009.

  • Image Result

    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 8h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and bottom

    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 8h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and bottom) = 100-bp molecular weight ladder; lane 2 (top and bottom) = positive control; lanes 4, 5, and 6 (top) = first replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 7, 8, and 9 (top) = second replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 10, 11, and 12 (top) = third replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 13 and 14 (top) and 4 (bottom) = fourth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 5, 6, and 7 (bottom) = fifth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lane 16 (top and bottom) = negative control; lanes 3 and 15 were empty.

  • Image Result
    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 10h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and botto

    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 10h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and bottom) = 100-bp molecular weight ladder; lane 2 (top and bottom) = positive control; lanes 4, 5, and 6 (top) = first replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 7, 8, and 9 (top) = second replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 10, 11, and 12 (top) = third replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 13 and 14 (top) and 4 (bottom) = fourth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 5, 6, and 7 (bottom) = fifth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lane 16 (top and bottom) = negative control; lanes 3 and 15 were empty.

  • Image Result
    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 12h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and botto

    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 12h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and bottom) = 100-bp molecular weight ladder; lane 2 (top and bottom) = positive control; lanes 4, 5, and 6 (top) = first replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 7, 8, and 9 (top) = second replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 10, 11, and 12 (top) = third replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 13 and 14 (top) and 4 (bottom) = fourth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 5, 6, and 7 (bottom) = fifth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lane 16 (top and bottom) = negative control; lanes 3 and 15 were empty.

  • Image Result
    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 14h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and botto

    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 14h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and bottom) = 100-bp molecular weight ladder; lane 2 (top and bottom) = positive control; lanes 4, 5, and 6 (top) = first replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 7, 8, and 9 (top) = second replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 10, 11, and 12 (top) = third replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 13 and 14 (top) and 4 (bottom) = fourth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 5, 6, and 7 (bottom) = fifth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lane 16 (top and bottom) = negative control; lanes 3 and 15 were empty.

  • Image Result
    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 16h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and botto

    Agarose gel analysis of amplified DNA obtained from 1-mL artificially contaminated milk samples. Samples were collected after 16h of pre-incubation and immunomagnetic separation. Lane 1 (top and bottom) = 100-bp molecular weight ladder; lane 2 (top and bottom) = positive control; lanes 4, 5, and 6 (top) = first replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 7, 8, and 9 (top) = second replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 10, 11, and 12 (top) = third replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 13 and 14 (top) and 4 (bottom) = fourth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lanes 5, 6, and 7 (bottom) = fifth replicate with 102, 101, and 1 cfu/mL of milk, respectively; lane 16 (top and bottom) = negative control; lanes 3 and 15 were empty.

PII: S0022-0302(09)70553-3

doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1537

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 6 , Pages 2382-2388 , June 2009