Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 8 , Pages 3545-3565 , August 2009

Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: Methods and applications

  • I.J. Lean

      Affiliations

    • SBScibus, PO 660, Camden, New South Wales, Australia
    • University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • A.R. Rabiee

      Affiliations

    • SBScibus, PO 660, Camden, New South Wales, Australia
    • University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, Australia
    • ,
  • T.F. Duffield

      Affiliations

    • Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada
    • ,
  • I.R. Dohoo

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Veterinary Epidemiological Research, Atlantic Veterinary College, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada

Received 17 February 2009 ,Accepted 19 April 2009.

References 

  1. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:240–248
  2. Baker R, Jackson D. A new approach to outliers in metaanalysis. Health Care Manage. Sci. 2008;11:121–131
  3. Becker BJ. Failsafe N or file-drawer number. In:  Rothstein HR,  Sutton AJ,  Borenstein M editor. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2005;p. 111–125
  4. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101
  5. Bramley E, Lean IJ, Fulkerson WJ, Stevenson MA, Rabiee AR, Costa ND. The definition of acidosis in dairy herds predominantly fed on pasture and concentrates. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:308–321
  6. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992;
  7. Burton NR, Lean F IJ. Investigation by meta-analysis of the effect of prostaglandin F2α administered post partum on the reproductive performance of dairy cattle. Vet. Rec. 1995;136:90–94
  8. Cant JP, Fredeen AH, MacIntyre T, Gunn J, Crowe N. Effect of fish oil and monensin on milk composition in dairy cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1997;77:125–131
  9. Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Levin H, Reitman D, Nagalingam R. Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline: II replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree. Stat. Med. 1987;6:733–744
  10. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA. 2004;291:2457–2465
  11. Charbonneau E, Pellerin D, Oetzel GR. Impact of lowering dietary cation-anion difference in nonlactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:537–548
  12. Cochrane Collaboration. 2008. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/
  13. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1969;
  14. Congdon P. Bayesian Statistical Modelling. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2001;
  15. Curtis CR, Erb HN, Sniffen CJ, Smith RD. Epidemiology of parturient paresis: Predisposing factors with emphasis on dry cow feeding and management. J. Dairy Sci. 1984;67:817–825
  16. Curtis, M. A. 1997. Uterine infections in dairy cows. PhD Thesis. University of Sydney, Australia.
  17. Davis JP, Chesney PJ, Wand PJ, La M, Venture M. Toxic-shock syndrome: Epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980;303:1429–1435
  18. Degaris PJ, Lean IJ, Rabiee AR, Heuer C. Effects of increasing days of exposure to prepartum transition diets on milk production and milk composition in dairy cows. Aust. Vet. J. 2008;86:341–351
  19. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials. 1986;7:177–188
  20. Dickersin K, Berlin JA. Meta-analysis: State of the science. Epidemiol. Rev. 1992;14:154–176
  21. Dohoo IR, DesCôteaux L, Leslie K, Fredeen A, Shewfelt W, Preston A, et al. A meta-analysis review of the effects of recombinant bovine somatotropin. 2. Effects on animal health, reproductive performance, and culling. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2003;67:252–264
  22. Dohoo IR, Leslie K, DesCôteaux L, Fredeen A, Dowling P, Preston A, et al. A meta-analysis review of the effects of recombinant bovine somatotropin. 1. Methodology and effects on production. Can. J. Vet. Res. 2003;67:241–251
  23. Dohoo IR, Martin W, Stryhn H. Introduction to observational studies. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. AVC Inc.. Canada: Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island; 2003;Pages 139–150
  24. Duffield TF, Lissemore KD, McBride BW, Leslie KE. Impact of hyperketonemia in early lactation dairy cows on health and production. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:571–580
  25. Duffield TF, Rabiee AR, Lean IJ. A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin in lactating dairy cattle. Part 1. Metabolic effects. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:1334–1346
  26. Duffield TF, Rabiee AR, Lean IJ. A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin in lactating dairy cattle. Part 2. Production effects. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:1347–1360
  27. Duffield TF, Rabiee AR, Lean IJ. A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin in lactating dairy cattle. Part 3. Health and reproduction. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:2328–2341
  28. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plotbased method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56:455–463
  29. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan A, Cronin E, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3081
  30. Egger M, Smith GD. Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In:  Egger M,  Davey Smith G,  Altman DG editor. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London, UK: British Medical Journal Books; 2001;p. 23–42
  31. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634
  32. Enevoldsen C. Nutritional risk factors for milk fever in dairy cattle: Meta-analysis revisited. Acta Vet. Scand. 1993;89(Suppl):131–134
  33. Evans AS. Causation and disease. The Henle-Koch postulates revisited. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1976;49:175–195
  34. Fourichon C, Seegers H, Malher X. Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: A meta-analysis. Theriogenology. 2000;53:1729–1759
  35. Galbraith RF. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat. Med. 1988;7:889–894
  36. Glass GV. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educ. Res. 1976;5:3–8
  37. Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. Meta-analysis in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1981;
  38. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical analysis. London, UK: Edward Arnold; 1995;
  39. Greenland S. Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature. Epidemiol. Rev. 1987;9:1–30
  40. Greenland S. Invited commentary: A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994;140:290–296
  41. Greenland S. Invited commentary: A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994;140:300–301
  42. Gross SJ, Ryan WG, Ploeger HW. Anthelmintic treatment of dairy cows and its effect on milk production. Vet. Rec. 1999;144:581–587
  43. Hedges LV. Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychol. Bull. 1982;92:490–499
  44. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta Analysis. 1st ed.. Orlando, FL: Academic Press Inc.; 1985;
  45. Higgins JPT, Thompsom SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560
  46. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002;21:1539–1558
  47. Higgins JT, Whitehead A, Turner RM, Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients. Stat. Med. 2001;20:2219–2241
  48. Hox JJ, de Leeuw ED. Multilevel models for metaanalysis. In:  Hox J editors. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Publishers; 2002;p. 139–155
  49. Hubbert WT, Dennis SM, Adams WM, Bierschwal CJ, Biggers JD, Carroll EJ, et al. Recommendations for standardizing bovine reproductive terms. Cornell Vet. 1972;62:216–237
  50. Huntsberger DV, Billingsley P. Elements of statistical inference. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1987;
  51. Ingvartsen K, Dewhurst R, Friggens N. On the relationship between lactational performance and health: Is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle?. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003;83:277–308
  52. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007;176:1091–1096
  53. Iyengar S, Greenhouse JB. Selection problems and the file drawer problem. Stat. Sci. 1988;3:109–135
  54. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42–46
  55. Kalaian HA, Raudenbush SW. A multivariate mixed linear model for meta-analysis. Psychol. Methods. 1996;1:227–235
  56. Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD. Methods in Observational Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996;
  57. Kelton DF, Lissemore KD, Martin RE. Recommendations for recording and calculating the incidence of selected clinical diseases of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1998;81:2502–2509
  58. L’Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O’Rourke K. Meta-analysis in clinical research. Ann. Intern. Med. 1987;107:224–233
  59. Lean IJ, Bruss ML, Troutt HF, Galland JC, Farver TB, Rostami J, et al. Bovine ketosis and somatotropin: Risk factors for ketosis and effects of ketosis on health and production. Res. Vet. Sci. 1994;57:200–209
  60. Lean IJ, DeGaris PJ, McNeil DM, Block E. Hypocalcemia in dairy cows: Meta-analysis and dietary cation anion difference theory revisited. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:669–684
  61. Lean IJ, Wade LK. Effects of monensin on metabolism, production, and health of dairy cattle. In:  Leslie KL editors. Usefulness of Ionophores in Lactating Dairy Cattle. Canada: Univ. Guelph, Ontario; 1997;p. 50–70
  62. Lean IJ, Westwood CT, Playford MC. Livestock disease threats associated with intensification of pastoral dairy farming. N. Z. Vet. J. 2008;56:261–269
  63. Lee WL, Bausell RB, Berman BM. The growth of health-related meta-analyses published from 1980 to 2000. Eval. Health Prof. 2001;24:327–335
  64. Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1984;
  65. Lindley DV. Bayesian Statistics, A Review. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM; 1972;
  66. Melendez P, Goff JP, Risco CA, Archbald LF, Littell RC, Donovan GA. Effect of administration of a controlled release monensin capsule on incidence of calving-related disorders, fertility, and milk yield in dairy cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2006;673:537–543
  67. Moate PJ, Chalupa W, Boston RC, Lean IJ. Milk fatty acids II: Prediction of the production of individual fatty acids in bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:1175–1188
  68. Morgan WF, Lean IJ. Effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment in cattle: A meta-analysis of the effects on conception at the time of insemination. Aust. Vet. J. 1993;70:205–209
  69. Mullen B, Miller N. Meta-Analysis. In:  Judd CM,  Smith ER,  Kidder LH editor. Research Methods in Social Relations.. 6th ed.. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1991;
  70. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2007;82:591–605
  71. Oetzel GR. Meta-analysis of nutritional risk factors for milk fever in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1991;74:3900–3912
  72. Oetzel GR. Management of dry cows for the prevention of milk fever and other mineral disorders. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2000;16:369–386
  73. Olkin I. Invited commentary: Re: “A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994;140:297–299
  74. Orwin RG. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. J. Educ. Stat. 1983;8:157–159
  75. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. The science of reviewing research. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1993;703:125–133
  76. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008;61:991–996
  77. Petiti DB. Meta-analysis, decision analysis and costeffectiveness analysis. Methods for Quantitative Synthesis in Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1994;Page 115
  78. Petticrew M. Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: Myths and misconceptions. BMJ. 2001;322:98–101
  79. Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Dorton KL, Engstrom ME, Sanchez WK. Effect of feeding Diamond V Yeast Culture™ on milk production and dry matter intake in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. J. Anim Sci. 2008;86(E-Suppl. 2):589;(Abstr.)
  80. Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Stevenson MA. A Bayesian metaanalysis of the effects of administering an intra-vaginal (CIDR) device in combination with other hormones on the reproductive performance of cycling, anoestrous and inseminated cows. N. Z. Vet. J. 2004;52:384–393
  81. Rabiee AR, Lean IJ, Stevenson MA. Efficacy of ovsynch program on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: A meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:2754–2770
  82. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Empirical Bayes metaanalysis. J. Educ. Stat. 1985;10:75–98
  83. Robert A, Seegers H, Bareille N. Incidence of intramammary infections during the dry period without or with antibiotic treatment in dairy cows—A quantitative analysis of published data. Vet. Res. 2006;73:25–48
  84. Rosenthal R. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol. Bull. 1979;86:638–641
  85. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1986;
  86. Sanchez J, Dohoo IR, Carrier J, DesCoteaux L. A meta-analysis of the milk-production response after anthelmintic treatment in naturally infected adult dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 2004;63:237–256
  87. Sargeant JM, Rajic A, Read S, Ohlsson A. The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health. Prev. Vet. Med. 2006;75:141–151
  88. Sauvant D, Schmidely P, Daudin JJ, St-Pierre NR. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal. 2008;2:1203–1214
  89. Sheldon IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S, Gilbert RO. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology. 2006;65:1516–1530
  90. Simmonds MC, Higgins JPT, Stewart LA, Tierney JF, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: A review of methods used in practice. Clin. Trials. 2005;2:209–217
  91. Sinclair LC, Bracken MB. Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992;
  92. Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR. Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. Health Technol. Assess. 2000;4:1–130
  93. St-Pierre NR. Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. J. Dairy Sci. 2001;84:741–755
  94. Stangl DK, Berry DA. Meta-analysis in medicine and health policy. Stata Tech. Bull. 8. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 2000;Pages 108–110
  95. Stewart LA, Clarke MJ. Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Stat. Med. 1995;14:2057–2079
  96. Thompson SG, Turner RM, Warn DE. Multilevel models for meta-analysis, and their application to absolute risk differences. Stat. Med. Res. 2001;10:375–392
  97. Tobias A. Assessing the influence of a single study in metaanalysis. College Station, TX: Stata Help. StataCorp.; 1999;
  98. Turner RM, Omar RZ, Yang M, Goldstein H, Thompson SG. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat. Med. 2000;19:3417–3432
  99. van den Noortgate W, Onghena P. Multilevel meta-analysis: A comparison with traditional meta-analytical procedures. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 2003;63:765–790
  100. Vercruysse J, Claerebout E. Treatment vs. non-treatment of helminth infections in cattle: Defining the threshold. Vet. Parasitol. 2001;98:195–214
  101. Westwood CT, Lean IJ, Kellaway RC. Indications and implications for testing of milk urea in dairy cattle: A quantitative review. (1) Dietary protein sources and metabolism. N. Z. Vet. J. 1998;46:87–96
  102. Westwood CT, Lean IJ, Kellaway RC. Indications and implications for testing of milk urea in dairy cattle: A quantitative review. (2) Effect of dietary protein on reproductive performance. N. Z. Vet. J. 1998;46:123–130
  103. Whitehead A. Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2002;
  104. Wright PJ, Malmo J. Pharmacologic manipulation of fertility. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1992;8:57–89

PII: S0022-0302(09)70676-9

doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2140

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 8 , Pages 3545-3565 , August 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution