Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 8 , Pages 3592-3603 , August 2009

Effect of washing conditions on the recovery of milk fat globule membrane proteins during the isolation of milk fat globule membrane from milk

  • T.T. Le

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • J. Van Camp

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium
    • Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Belgium
  • ,
  • R. Rombaut

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium
  • ,
  • F. van Leeckwyck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium
  • ,
  • K. Dewettinck

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium

Received 31 December 2008 ,Accepted 17 April 2009.

  • Image Result

    Experimental isolation procedure of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) material from milk.

    Experimental isolation procedure of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) material from milk.

  • Image Result

    Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE pattern of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) samples obtained from different washing solutions: MU = milk ultrafiltrate; P5=50mM phosphate, pH 6.8, and 0.15 M NaCl; K=1.5g o

    Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE pattern of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) samples obtained from different washing solutions: MU = milk ultrafiltrate; P5=50mM phosphate, pH 6.8, and 0.15 M NaCl; K=1.5g of KCl/L of water; D = deionized water. The sample load on each lane was 100ng of total protein. Subscripts 1, 2, and 3 indicate replicates 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Other lanes: SM = 100ng of skimmed milk proteins; c1, c5, and c10 = pure proteins (BSA, αS-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, β-LG, and α-LA) loaded at 1, 5, and 10ng of each protein, respectively; and M12 = molecular weight indicator. Identification of MFGM proteins according to Mather (2000) and other proteins is given on the left; MUC1 = mucin 1; XDH/XO = xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase; PAS III = periodic acid Schiff III; CD36 = cluster of differentiation 36, BTN = butyrophilin; PAS 6/7 = periodic acid Schiff 6/7; ADPH = adipophilin; PP3 = proteose peptone 3. The asterisk (*) indicates variants of the fragment of BTN released by proteolysis and lacking the C-terminus (Mather, 2000). One of the bands at the arrows could be apolipoprotein E (Fong et al., 2007).

  • Image Result
    Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE pattern of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) samples obtained from different washing temperatures: 38, 42, and 46°C. The sample load of total protein on each lane was 100ng.

    Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE pattern of milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) samples obtained from different washing temperatures: 38, 42, and 46°C. The sample load of total protein on each lane was 100ng. Subscripts 3 and 4 indicate replicates. Other lanes: SM = 100ng of skim milk proteins; c1, c5, and c10 = pure proteins (BSA, αS-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, β-LG, and α-LA) loaded at 1, 5, and 10ng of each protein, respectively; and M12 = molecular weight indicator. Lanes 38w, 42w, and 46w were loaded with 0.5μL of the third discharged washing solutions of isolation at 38, 42, and 46°C. The lanes contained 30, 36, and 41ng of total proteins, respectively. Identification of MFGM proteins according to Mather (2000) and other proteins is given on the left; MUC1 = mucin 1; XDH/XO = xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase; PAS III = periodic acid Schiff III; CD36 = cluster of differentiation 36, BTN = butyrophilin; PAS 6/7 = periodic acid Schiff 6/7; ADPH = adipophilin; PP3 = proteose peptone 3. The asterisk (*) indicates variants of the fragment of BTN released by proteolysis and lacking the C-terminus (Mather, 2000). One of the bands at the arrows could be apolipoprotein E (Fong et al., 2007).

  • Image Result
    Sauter mean diameter [d(3,2)] of fat globules of milk, separated cream (cream), and that after the first (1w), second (2w), and third (3w) wash at 38 (—♦—), 42 (—■—) and 46°C (—▴—). The samples were d

    Sauter mean diameter [d(3,2)] of fat globules of milk, separated cream (cream), and that after the first (1w), second (2w), and third (3w) wash at 38 (—♦—), 42 (—■—) and 46°C (—▴—). The samples were dispersed in a) water and b) SDS/EDTA solution before measuring.

  • Image Result
    Fat globule size distributions in volume percentage versus droplet diameter of milk (—) and separated cream (----) and cream after the first (—△—), the second (—×—), and the third wash (—○—), which we

    Fat globule size distributions in volume percentage versus droplet diameter of milk (—) and separated cream (----) and cream after the first (—△—), the second (—×—), and the third wash (—○—), which were determined after dispersing the samples in water. Cream separation and washing was done at a) 38, b) 42, and c) 46°C. The arrow points to a small and broad peak between 10 and 100μm.

  • Image Result
    Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE pattern of milk (M) and milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) sample (E) isolated using procedure E (2 washes with 4.5L of deionized water) under the staining with Simply Blue (

    Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE pattern of milk (M) and milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) sample (E) isolated using procedure E (2 washes with 4.5L of deionized water) under the staining with Simply Blue (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium). The sample load on each lane was 20μg of total protein. M12 = molecular weight indicator. Identification of MFGM proteins according to Mather (2000) and other proteins is given on the right; MUC1 = mucin 1; XO = xanthine oxidase; CD36 = cluster of differentiation 36, BTN = butyrophilin; PAS 6/7 = periodic acid Schiff 6/7; ADPH = adipophilin; PP3 = proteose peptone 3.

PII: S0022-0302(09)70680-0

doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-2009

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 8 , Pages 3592-3603 , August 2009