Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 9 , Pages 4101-4111 , September 2009

Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle—Key concepts and the role of science

  • M.A.G. von Keyserlingk

      Affiliations

    • Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • J. Rushen

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 1000, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada, V0M 1A0
    • ,
  • A.M. de Passillé

      Affiliations

    • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, PO Box 1000, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada, V0M 1A0
    • ,
  • D.M. Weary

      Affiliations

    • Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4

Received 25 April 2009 ,Accepted 2 June 2009.

References 

  1. Bernardi F, Fregonosi J, Veira DM, Winkler CM, von Keyserlingk AG, Weary DM. The stall design paradox: Neck rails increase lameness but improve udder and stall hygiene. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3074–3080
  2. Bertenshaw CE, Rowlinson PR, Edge HL, Douglas S, Shiel R. The effect of different degrees of ‘positive’ human–animal interaction during rearing on welfare and subsequent production of commercial dairy heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;114:65–75
  3. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol. Behav. 2007;92:375–397
  4. Borderas TF, Rushen J, de Passillé AM. Behavioral effects of endotoxin-induced fever in dairy calves. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;86:2920–2927
  5. Borderas TF, Fournier A, Rushen J, de Passille AMB. Effect of lameness on dairy cows’ visits to automatic milking systems. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;88:1–8
  6. Bruckmaier RM, Blum JW. Oxytocin release and milk removal in ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 1998;81:939–949
  7. Channon AJ, Walker AM, Pfau T, Sheldon IM, Wilson AM. Variability of Manson and Leaver locomotion scores assigned to dairy cows by different observers. Vet. Rec. 2009;164:388–392
  8. Colditz IG. Effects of the immune system on metabolism: Implications for production and disease resistance in livestock. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002;75:257–268
  9. Cook NB, Nordlund KV. Review: The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd health lameness dynamics. Vet. J. 2009;179:360–369
  10. Dawkins MS. The science of animal suffering. Ethology. 2008;114:937–945
  11. de Passillé AM, Christopherson RJ, Rushen J. Nonnutritive sucking and the postprandial secretion of insulin, CCK and gastrin in the calf. Physiol. Behav. 1993;54:1069–1073
  12. de Passillé AMB, Rushen J. Calves’ behaviour during nursing is affected by feeding motivation and milk availability. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;101:264–275
  13. DeVries TJ, von Keyserlingk MAG. Effects of feeder design on the social and feeding behaviour of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3522–3531
  14. Diaz MC, Van Amburgh ME, Smith JM, Kelsey JM, Hutten EL. Composition of growth of Holstein calves fed milk replacer from birth to 105-kilogram body weight. J. Dairy Sci. 2001;84:830–842
  15. Eicher SD, Cheng HW, Sorrells AD, Schutz MM. Short communication: Behavioral and physiological indicators of sensitivity or chronic pain following tail docking. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3047–3051
  16. Færevika G, Andersen IL, Jensen MB, Bøe KE. Increased group size reduces conflicts and strengthens the preference for familiar group mates after regrouping of weaned dairy calves (Bos taurus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007;108:215–228
  17. Fleischer P, Metzner M, Beyerbach M, Hoedemaker M, Klee W. The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2001;84:2025–2035
  18. Flower FC, Sanderson DJ, Weary DM. Hoof pathologies influence kinematic measures of dairy cow gait. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:3166–3175
  19. Flower FC, Weary DM. The effects of early separation on the dairy cow and calf. Anim. Welf. 2003;12:339–348
  20. Flower FC, Weary DM. Gait assessment in dairy cattle. Animal. 2009;3:87–95
  21. Fraser D. Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: The interplay of science and values. Anim. Welf. 2003;12:433–443
  22. Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in Its Cultural Context. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008;
  23. Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welf. 1997;6:187–205
  24. Goff JP. Major advances in our understanding of nutritional influences on bovine health. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:1292–1301
  25. González LA, Tolkamp BJ, Coffey MP, Ferret A, Kyriazakis I. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:1017–1028
  26. Gröhn YT, Rajala-Schultz PJ, Allore HG, DeLorenzo MA, Hertl JA, Galligan DT. Optimizing replacement of dairy cows: Modeling the effects of diseases. Prev. Vet. Med. 2003;61:27–43
  27. Hammon DS, Evjen IM, Dhiman TR, Goff JP, Walters JL. Neutrophil function and energy status in Holstein cows with uterine health disorders. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2006;113:21–29
  28. Hammon HM, Schiessler G, Nussbaum A, Blum JW. Feed intake patterns, growth performance, and metabolic and endocrine traits in calves fed unlimited amounts of colostrum and milk by automate, starting in the neonatal period. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:3352–3362
  29. Hänninen L, Hepola H, Raussi S, Saloniemi H. Effect of colostrum feeding method and presence of dam on the sleep, rest and sucking behaviour of newborn calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;112:213–222
  30. Heinrich A, Duffield TF, Lissemore KD, Squires EJ, Millman ST. The impact of meloxicam on postsurgical stress associated with cautery dehorning. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:540–547
  31. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Beveridge L, Matthews LR. The welfare of extensively managed dairy cattle: A review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995;42:161–182
  32. Hernandez-Mendo OM, von Keyserlingk AG, Veira DM, Weary DM. Effects of pasture on lameness in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:1209–1214
  33. Huzzey JM, Veira DM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG. Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3220–3233
  34. Ingvartsen KL, Dewhurst RJ, Friggens NC. On the relationship between lactational performance and health: Is it yield or metabolic imbalance that cause production diseases in dairy cattle? A position paper. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003;83:277–308
  35. Jensen MB. Computer-controlled milk feeding of group-housed calves: The effect of milk allowance and weaning type. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:201–206
  36. Jensen MB, de Passillé AM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Rushen J. A barrier can reduce competition over teats in pair-housed milk-fed calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:1607–1613
  37. Kelm SC, Freeman AE NC-2 Technical Committee. Direct and correlated responses to selection for milk yield: Results and conclusions of Regional Project NC-2, “Improvement of dairy cattle through breeding, with emphasis on selection.”. J. Dairy Sci. 2000;83:2721–2732
  38. Kung L, Demarco S, Siebenson LN, Joyner EG, Haenlein FW, Morris RM. An evaluation of two management systems for rearing calves fed milk replacer. J. Dairy Sci. 1997;80:2529–2533
  39. Lean IJ, Westwood CT, Playford MC. Livestock disease threats associated with intensification of pastoral dairy farming. N. Z. Vet. J. 2008;56:261–269
  40. Legrand ALM, von Keyserlingk AG, Weary DM. Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3651–3658
  41. Millman ST. Sickness behaviour and its relevance to animal welfare assessment at the group level. Anim. Welf. 2007;16:123–125
  42. World Organization for Animal Health. Introduction to the recommendations for animal welfare. Article 7. 1. 1. Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2008. Paris, France: World Organization for Animal Health (OIE); 2008;Pages 235–236
  43. Orihuela A, Galina CS. Social order measured in pasture and pen conditions and its relationship to sexual behavior in Brahman (Bos indicus) cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997;52:3–11
  44. Pastell ME, Kujala M. A probabilistic neural network model for lameness detection. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:2283–2292
  45. Phillips CJC, Rind MI. The effects of social dominance on the production and behaviour of grazing dairy cows offered forage supplements. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:51–59
  46. Proudfoot KA, Veira DM, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG. Competition at the feed bunk changes the feeding, standing, and social behavior of transition dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2009;92:3116–3123
  47. Rauw WM, Kanis E, Noordhuizen-Stassen EN, Grommers FJ. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1998;56:15–33
  48. Rushen J, de Passillé AM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. The Welfare of Cattle. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2008;
  49. Rushen J, Munksgaard L, Marnet PG, de Passillé AM. Human contact and the effects of acute stress on cows at milking. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;73:1–14
  50. Schreiner DA, Ruegg PL. Effects of tail docking on milk quality and cow cleanliness. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:2503–2511
  51. Schütz KE, Rogers AR, Cox NR, Tucker CB. Dairy cows prefer shade that offers greater protection against solar radiation in summer: Shade use, behaviour, and body temperature. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;116:28–34
  52. Shamay A, Werner D, Moallem U, Barash H, Bruckental I. Effect of nursing management and skeletal size at weaning on puberty, skeletal growth rate and milk production during first lactation of dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:1460–1469
  53. Song X, Leroy T, Vranken E, Maertens W, Sonck B, Berckmans D. Automatic detection of lameness in dairy cattle-Vision-based trackway analysis in cow's locomotion. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008;64:39–44
  54. Špinka M. How important is natural behaviour in animal farming systems? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;100:117–128
  55. Stafford KJ, Mellor DJ. Dehorning and disbudding distress and its alleviation in calves. Vet. J. 2005;169:337–349
  56. Stilwell G, de Carvalho RC, Lima MS, Broom DM. Effect of caustic paste disbudding, using local anaesthesia with and without analgesia, on behaviour and cortisol of calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;116:35–44
  57. Svensson C, Jensen MB. Short communication: Identification of diseased calves by use of data from automatic milk feeders. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:994–997
  58. Tadich N, Flor E, Green L. Associations between hoof lesions and locomotion score in 1098 unsound dairy cows. Vet. J. 2009;doi:10. 1016/j. tvjl. 2009. 01. 005
  59. Thomas TJ, Weary DM, Appleby MC. Newborn and 5-week-old calves vocalize in response to milk deprivation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001;74:165–173
  60. Tom EMI, Duncan JH, Widowski TM, Bateman KG, Leslie KE. Effects of tail docking using a rubber ring with or without anesthetic on behavior and production of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:2257–2265
  61. Tom EM, Rushen J, Duncan IJH, de Passillé AM. Behavioural, health and cortisol responses of young calves to tail docking using a rubber ring or docking iron. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2002;82:1–9
  62. USDA. 2007. Dairy 2007, Part I: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007. No. N480.1007. USDA-Anim. Plant Health Inspection Serv.-Vet. Serv., Centers Epidemiol. Anim. Health, Fort Collins, CO.
  63. USDA. 2009. Dairy 2007, Part IV: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States, 2007. No. N494.0209. USDA-Anim. Plant Health Inspection Serv.-Vet. Serv., Centers Epidemiol. Anim. Health, Fort Collins, CO.
  64. Vanegas J, Overton M, Berry SL, Sischo WM. Effect of rubber flooring on claw health in lactating dairy cows housed in free-stall barns. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:4251–4258
  65. Veissier I, Butterworth A, Bock B, Roe E. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;113:279–297
  66. Vickers KJ, Niel L, Kiehlbauch LM, Weary DM. Calf response to caustic paste and hot-iron dehorning using sedation with and without local anesthetic. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:1454–1459
  67. Vieira AD, Guesdon V, de Passillé AM, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Behavioural indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008;109:180–189
  68. von Keyserlingk MAG, Olenick D, Weary DM. Acute behavioral effects of regrouping dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:1011–1016
  69. von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Maternal behaviour in cattle: A review. Horm. Behav. 2007;52:106–113
  70. Washburn SP, White SL, Green JT, Benson GA. Reproduction, mastitis, and body condition of seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows in confinement or pasture systems. J. Dairy Sci. 2002;85:105–111
  71. Weary DM, Huzzey JM, von Keyserlingk MAG. Board-invited review: Using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;87:770–777
  72. Weary DM, Niel L, Flower FC, Fraser D. Identifying and preventing pain in animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;100:64–76
  73. Whay HR, Main DCJ, Green LE, Webster AJF. Assessment of the welfare of dairy cattle using animal-based measurements: Direct observations and investigation of farm records. Vet. Rec. 2003;153:197–202

PII: S0022-0302(09)70735-0

doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2326

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 9 , Pages 4101-4111 , September 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution