Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 10 , Pages 4773-4791, October 2009

Comparison of composition, sensory, and volatile components of thirty-four percent whey protein and milk serum protein concentrates1

  • J. Evans

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Science, Bioprocessing, and Nutritional Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
  • ,
  • J. Zulewska

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Food Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
  • ,
  • M. Newbold

      Affiliations

    • Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
  • ,
  • M.A. Drake

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Science, Bioprocessing, and Nutritional Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
  • ,
  • D.M. Barbano

      Affiliations

    • Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
    • Corresponding author.

Received 7 March 2009; accepted 19 May 2009.

Abstract 

The objectives of this study were to identify and compare the composition, flavor, and volatile components of serum protein concentrate (SPC) and whey protein concentrate (WPC) containing about 34% protein made from the same milk to each other and to commercial 34% WPC from 6 different factories. The SPC and WPC were manufactured in triplicate with each pair of serum and traditional whey protein manufactured from the same lot of milk. At each replication, SPC and WPC were spray dried (SD) and freeze dried (FD) to determine the effect of the heat used in spray drying on sensory properties. A trained sensory panel documented the sensory profiles of rehydrated SD or FD powders. Volatile components were extracted by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and solvent extraction followed by solvent-assisted flavor evaporation (SAFE) with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-olfactometry. Whey protein concentrates had higher fat content, calcium, and glycomacropeptide content than SPC. Color differences (Hunter L, a, b) were not evident between SPC and WPC powders, but when rehydrated, SPC solutions were clear, whereas WPC solutions were cloudy. No consistent differences were documented in sensory profiles of SD and FD SPC and WPC. The SD WPC had low but distinct buttery (diacetyl) and cardboard flavors, whereas the SD SPC did not. Sensory profiles of both rehydrated SD products were bland and lower in overall aroma and cardboard flavor compared with the commercial WPC. Twenty-nine aroma impact compounds were identified in the SPC and WPC. Lipid and protein oxidation products were present in both products. The SPC and WPC manufactured in this study had lower total volatiles and lower concentrations of many lipid oxidation compounds when compared with commercial WPC. Our results suggest that when SPC and WPC are manufactured under controlled conditions in a similar manner from the same milk using the same ultrafiltration equipment, there are few sensory differences but distinct compositional and physical property differences that may influence functionality. Furthermore, flavor (sensory and instrumental) properties of both pilot-scale manufactured protein powders were different from commercial powders suggesting the role of other influencing factors (e.g., milk supply, processing equipment, sanitation).

Key words: whey protein, serum protein, flavor, microfiltration

 

PII: S0022-0302(09)70806-9

doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2194

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 10 , Pages 4773-4791, October 2009