Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 11 , Pages 5335-5352 , November 2009

Invited review: Milk protein polymorphisms in cattle: Effect on animal breeding and human nutrition

  • A.M. Caroli

      Affiliations

    • Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Viale Europa 11, Brescia, 25123 Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • S. Chessa

      Affiliations

    • Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Veterinarie per la Sicurezza Alimentare, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Trentacoste 2, Milano, 20134 Italy
  • ,
  • G.J. Erhardt

      Affiliations

    • Institut für Tierzucht und Haustiergenetik, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Ludwigstr. 21 b, 35390 Gießen, Germany

Received 5 June 2009 ,Accepted 28 July 2009.

  • Image Result

    Structural organization of the transcription units encoding the 6 main milk proteins. Caseins: αs1-CN (CSN1S1), β-CN (CSN2), αs2-CN (CSN1S2), and κ-CN (CSN3). Whey proteins: α-LA (LAA) and β-LG (LGB).

    Structural organization of the transcription units encoding the 6 main milk proteins. Caseins: αs1-CN (CSN1S1), β-CN (CSN2), αs2-CN (CSN1S2), and κ-CN (CSN3). Whey proteins: α-LA (LAA) and β-LG (LGB). A) Genomic organization of the bovine casein locus. B) Structural organization of the 6 milk protein transcription units. Open bars represent introns; exons are depicted by large, gray (5′ and 3′ untranslated regions), black (part of exon encoding the signal peptide), and colored (exons and part of exons encoding matured proteins) boxes. Size of exons is given, in base pairs, under each exon with its number indicated on the top (modified from Martin et al., 2002).

  • Image Result
    Alignment of the sequences of Bos taurus (BT), Capra hircus (CH), and Ovis aries (OA) casein genes (lines 1, 3, and 5) and preprotein (lines 2, 4, and 6). The positions above the first line refer to t

    Alignment of the sequences of Bos taurus (BT), Capra hircus (CH), and Ovis aries (OA) casein genes (lines 1, 3, and 5) and preprotein (lines 2, 4, and 6). The positions above the first line refer to the protein, starting from the signal peptide (indicated as negative values) to the first AA of the mature protein (+01). Highlighted in yellow: nucleotides and AA differing in Capra hircus and/or Ovis aries with respect to Bos taurus; in blue: nucleotide and/or AA in which intraspecies genetic variations occur; in green: both interspecific and intraspecific variation occur; in gray: missing or conflicting data (AA 141–148 are not available in the ovine reference sequence; AA −9 is not clearly defined from the ovine nucleotide sequence; AA 137 is a controversial inversion with AA 138 in the bovine CSN2 sequence, see Table 2). Nucleotides affected by interspecific or intraspecific variation are bolded and in italics. CSN1S1=αs1-CN gene; CSN1S2=αs2-CN gene.

  • Image Result
    Alignment of the sequences of Bos taurus (BT), Capra hircus (CH), and Ovis aries (OA) casein genes (lines 1, 3, and 5) and preprotein (lines 2, 4, and 6). The positions above the first line refer to t

    Alignment of the sequences of Bos taurus (BT), Capra hircus (CH), and Ovis aries (OA) casein genes (lines 1, 3, and 5) and preprotein (lines 2, 4, and 6). The positions above the first line refer to the protein, starting from the signal peptide (indicated as negative values) to the first AA of the mature protein (+01). Highlighted in yellow: nucleotides and AA differing in Capra hircus and/or Ovis aries with respect to Bos taurus; in blue: nucleotide and/or AA in which intraspecies genetic variations occur; in green: both interspecific and intraspecific variation occur; in gray: missing or conflicting data (AA 141–148 are not available in the ovine reference sequence; AA −9 is not clearly defined from the ovine nucleotide sequence; AA 137 is a controversial inversion with AA 138 in the bovine CSN2 sequence, see Table 2). Nucleotides affected by interspecific or intraspecific variation are bolded and in italics. CSN2=β-CN gene; CSN3=κ-CN gene.

PII: S0022-0302(09)70865-3

doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2461

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 11 , Pages 5335-5352 , November 2009