« Previous
Next »
Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 11
, Pages
5386-5395
, November 2009
Validation of a curd-syneresis sensor over a range of milk composition and process parameters
-
Visible–near-infrared reflectance spectra showing the effect of (a) curd-stirring speed at 3 levels [10 (thin black line), 16 (thick black line), and 22 (gray line) rpm] for one cutting intensity leve
Visible–near-infrared reflectance spectra showing the effect of (a) curd-stirring speed at 3 levels [10 (thin black line), 16 (thick black line), and 22 (gray line) rpm] for one cutting intensity level (8.3 total revolutions) and (b) fat level in milk at 3 levels [0 (thin black line), 2.5 (thick black line), and 5 (gray line) g/100
g] for one gel firmness level at cutting (35
Pa). Both graphs show the untreated spectra of 3 trials during syneresis at 45
min after gel cutting. -
Fit of model for yield of whey, Yw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 1) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Yw was determined at 10-min intervals from time (t)=5 to 75min after gel cutFit of model for yield of whey, Yw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 1) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Yw was determined at 10-min intervals from time (t)
=
5 to 75
min after gel cutting during syneresis, giving n
=
216 data points in each experiment. Each experiment involves 2 clusters of data points corresponding to t
=
5
min and t
>
5
min, respectively. -
Fit of model for yield of whey, Yw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 3) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Yw was determined at 10-min intervals from time (t)=5 to 75min after gel cutFit of model for yield of whey, Yw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 3) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Yw was determined at 10-min intervals from time (t)
=
5 to 75
min after gel cutting during syneresis, giving n
=
192 data points in experiment 3 and n
=
216 in experiment 2. Each experiment involves 2 clusters of data points corresponding to t
=
5
min and t
>
5
min, respectively. -
Fit of model for fat in whey, Fw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 1) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Fw was determined at 20-min intervals between time (t)=15 to 75min after gel cFit of model for fat in whey, Fw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 1) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Fw was determined at 20-min intervals between time (t)
=
15 to 75
min after gel cutting during syneresis, giving n
=
108. -
Fit of model for fat in whey, Fw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 3) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Fw was determined at 20-min intervals between time (t)=15 to 75min after gel cFit of model for fat in whey, Fw, to (a) the calibration set (experiment 3) and to (b) the validation set (experiment 2). Fw was determined at 20-min intervals between time (t)
=
15 to 75
min after gel cutting during syneresis, giving n
=
96 data points in experiment 3 and n
=
108 in experiment 2. Experiment 3 involves 3 clusters of data points corresponding to the 3 fat:protein ratios investigated.
PII: S0022-0302(09)70871-9
doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2363
© 2009 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 92, Issue 11
, Pages
5386-5395
, November 2009
