Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 911-921 , March 2010

Naturally occurring mastitis effects on timing of ovulation, steroid and gonadotrophic hormone concentrations, and follicular and luteal growth in cows

  • Y. Lavon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University, Rehovot, 76100 Israel
  • ,
  • G. Leitner

      Affiliations

    • Mastitis Laboratory, The Veterinary Institute, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
  • ,
  • H. Voet

      Affiliations

    • Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University, Rehovot, 76100 Israel
  • ,
  • D. Wolfenson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, the Hebrew University, Rehovot, 76100 Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 8 February 2009 ,Accepted 23 November 2009.

  • Image Result

    Estrus to ovulation (E-O) intervals in uninfected cows (n=22) and in cows with clinical (n=9) or subclinical (n=37) mastitis. a) Percentage of cows exhibiting an extended E-O interval and cows that di

    Estrus to ovulation (E-O) intervals in uninfected cows (n=22) and in cows with clinical (n=9) or subclinical (n=37) mastitis. a) Percentage of cows exhibiting an extended E-O interval and cows that did not ovulate during the 96-h experimental period after onset of estrus. An asterisk indicates the difference between uninfected cows and subclinical or total mastitic cows that exhibited an extended E-O interval or those that did not ovulate (P<0.05). b) The E-O interval in uninfected cows exhibiting a normal interval and in clinical or subclinical mastitic cows exhibiting a normal or extended interval. One uninfected cow with extended E-O interval (76 DIM; fourth lactation; 54kg of milk/d; SCC 43 × 103 cells/mL) that had postpartum disease was not included. Four of 12 cows did not ovulate during the experimental period. An asterisk indicates the difference in E-O interval between mastitic cows exhibiting an extended interval and uninfected or mastitic cows exhibiting a normal interval (P<0.01).

  • Image Result
    Mean (±SE) concentrations of cortisol in plasma from 3 representative days around estrus (d 19, 0, and 1) in uninfected cows (n=9) exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval and in subclin

    Mean (±SE) concentrations of cortisol in plasma from 3 representative days around estrus (d 19, 0, and 1) in uninfected cows (n=9) exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval and in subclinical or clinical mastitic cows exhibiting normal (n=14 or 5, respectively) or extended (n=5 or 2, respectively) E-O intervals.

  • Image Result
    Mean (±SE) concentrations of estradiol in plasma at onset of estrus in uninfected cows (n=11) exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval and in subclinical or clinical mastitic cows exhibi

    Mean (±SE) concentrations of estradiol in plasma at onset of estrus in uninfected cows (n=11) exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval and in subclinical or clinical mastitic cows exhibiting normal (n=14 or 6, respectively) or extended (n=6 or 2, respectively) E-O intervals. An asterisk indicates the difference between uninfected, clinical mastitic, and subclinical mastitic cows exhibiting a normal E-O interval and subclinical and clinical cows exhibiting an extended E-O interval (P<0.05).

  • Image Result
    Pulsatile LH concentrations in representative uninfected, subclinical mastitic, and clinical mastitic cows. Samples were taken in the follicular phase over 6h at 15-min intervals.

    Pulsatile LH concentrations in representative uninfected, subclinical mastitic, and clinical mastitic cows. Samples were taken in the follicular phase over 6h at 15-min intervals.

  • Image Result
    Concentrations of LH in plasma around the preovulatory surge. a) Means of uninfected (n=10), subclinical mastitic (n=10), or clinical mastitic (n=5) cows exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation interv

    Concentrations of LH in plasma around the preovulatory surge. a) Means of uninfected (n=10), subclinical mastitic (n=10), or clinical mastitic (n=5) cows exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation interval. Pooled SEM are 1.1, 1.8, and 1.6 ng/mL, respectively. b) Individual LH concentrations of 3 mastitic cows exhibiting low LH surges, which subsequently manifested delayed ovulation. c) Individual LH concentrations of 2 mastitic cows exhibiting normal but delayed LH surges, which subsequently manifested delayed ovulation. d) Individual LH concentrations of 2 mastitic cows that did not exhibit or exhibited a minimal LH surge and subsequently did not ovulate during the 96-h experimental period.

  • Image Result
    a) Mean concentrations of progesterone in plasma of uninfected cows (n=14), cows with clinical mastitis (n=7), and cows with subclinical mastitis (n=27) exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) i

    a) Mean concentrations of progesterone in plasma of uninfected cows (n=14), cows with clinical mastitis (n=7), and cows with subclinical mastitis (n=27) exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval, and cows with subclinical mastitis (n=5) exhibiting an extended E-O interval. Data from 1 uninfected cow and 1 clinical mastitic cow, which had exhibited an extended E-O interval, are not shown. Pooled SEM are 0.19, 0.3, 0.13, and 0.37 ng/mL, respectively. b) Mean volume of the corpus luteum in uninfected cows (n=18), cows with clinical mastitis (n=7), and cows with subclinical mastitis (n=32) exhibiting a normal E-O interval, and cows with subclinical mastitis (n=6) exhibiting an extended E-O interval. Pooled SEM are 524, 841, 393, and 447mm3, respectively. Progesterone in plasma and the corpus luteum volume did not differ among groups, and there were no interactions between group and day.

  • Image Result
    Growth patterns of the first- and second-wave dominant follicles during the estrus cycle following ovulation of uninfected (n=17), clinical mastitic (n=7), and subclinical mastitic (n=32) cows exhibit

    Growth patterns of the first- and second-wave dominant follicles during the estrus cycle following ovulation of uninfected (n=17), clinical mastitic (n=7), and subclinical mastitic (n=32) cows exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval, and subclinical mastitic cows (n=6) exhibiting an extended E-O interval. Pooled SEM for the respective groups during the first follicular wave were 0.6, 0.8, 0.3, and 0.8mm, and during the second follicular wave were 0.5, 1.0, 0.4, and 0.9mm. The second-wave dominant follicle (d 14–20) was smaller in subclinical cows with an extended E-O interval compared with uninfected and subclinical-normal groups (P<0.05).

  • Image Result
    Numbers of a) medium follicles (5–9mm) and b) large follicles (>10mm) of uninfected (n=17), clinical mastitic (n=7), and subclinical mastitic (n=32) cows exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O)

    Numbers of a) medium follicles (5–9mm) and b) large follicles (>10mm) of uninfected (n=17), clinical mastitic (n=7), and subclinical mastitic (n=32) cows exhibiting a normal estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval, and subclinical mastitic cows (n=6) exhibiting an extended E-O interval. Pooled SEM for the respective groups for the number of medium follicles were 0.25, 0.21, 0.19, and 0.46 and for large follicles were 0.08, 0.09, 0.07, and 0.17, respectively. The number of medium follicles was greater in subclinical cows with an extended E-O interval compared with the other groups (P<0.05). The number of large follicles did not differ among groups, and there was no interaction of group by day.

PII: S0022-0302(10)00058-5

doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2112

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 911-921 , March 2010