Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 1266-1282 , March 2010

The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment

  • C.A. Rotz

      Affiliations

    • USDA/Agricultural Research Service, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • F. Montes

      Affiliations

    • USDA/Agricultural Research Service, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, University Park, PA 16802
    • ,
  • D.S. Chianese

      Affiliations

    • ENVIRON International Corporation, Los Angeles, CA 90017

Received 24 February 2009 ,Accepted 2 December 2009.

References 

  1. AMPE. 2008. Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry. Association of Polymer Manufacturers in Europe, Brussels, Belgium. http://lca.plasticseurope.org/main2.htm Accessed March 8, 2008.
  2. Bailey J, Ollis D. Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals. 2nd ed.. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1986;
  3. Bath, M., B. English, A. Turhollow, and H. Nyangito. 1994. Energy in Synthetic Fertilizers and Pesticides: Revisited. Oakridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/10120269-p6yhLc/webviewable/10120269.PDF Accessed July 9, 2008.
  4. Borjesson P. Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation. Biomass Bioenergy. 1996;11:305–318
  5. Bowers W. Agricultural field equipment. In:  Fluck R editors. Energy in Farm Production. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1992;p. 117–129
  6. Bruce JP, Frome M, Haites E, Janzen H, Lal R, Paustian K. Carbon sequestration in soils. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1999;54:382–389
  7. Capper JL, Castaneda-Gutierrez E, Cady RA, Bauman DE. The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9668–9673
  8. Casey JW, Holden NM. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the Irish milk production system. Agric. Syst. 2005;86:97–114
  9. Cederberg C, Mattsson B. Life cycle assessment of milk production—A comparison of conventional and organic farming. J. Clean. Prod. 2000;8:49–60
  10. Cederberg C, Stadig M. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2003;8:350–356
  11. Chianese DS, Rotz CA, Richard TL. Whole-farm greenhouse gas emissions: A review with application to a Pennsylvania dairy farm. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2009;25:431–442
  12. Chianese DS, Rotz CA, Richard TL. Simulation of carbon dioxide emissions from dairy farms to assess greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Trans. ASABE. 2009;52:1301–1312
  13. Chianese DS, Rotz CA, Richard TL. Simulation of methane emissions from dairy farms to assess greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Trans. ASABE. 2009;52:1313–1323
  14. Chianese DS, Rotz CA, Richard TL. Simulation of nitrous oxide emissions from dairy farms to assess greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Trans. ASABE. 2009;52:1325–1335
  15. Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001;87:51–65
  16. Doering O. Accounting for energy in farm machinery and buildings. In:  Pimentel D editors. Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.; 1980;p. 9–21
  17. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2006. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2005. DOE/EIA-0573 (2004). U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/ Accessed November 12, 2007.
  18. EPA. 1999. U.S. Methane Emissions 1990–2020: Inventories, Projections, and Opportunities for Reductions. EPA 430-R-99–013. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/ghginfo Accessed November 23, 2007.
  19. EPA. 2008. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2006. EPA 430-R-08–005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads/08_Annex_6.pdf Accessed July 9, 2008.
  20. Farrell, A., R. Plevin, B. Turner, A. Jones, M. O’Hare, and D. Kammen. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:506–508. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5760/506/DC1 Accessed July 9, 2008.
  21. Fluck R. Energy analysis for agricultural systems. In:  Fluck R editors. Energy in Farm Production. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 1992;p. 45–52
  22. FAO. Livestock's Long Shadow. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2006;
  23. Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Tylutki TP, Russell JB, Van Amburgh ME, Chase LE, et al. The Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004;112:29–78
  24. Franzluebbers A, Follett R. Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential in agricultural regions of North America: Introduction. Soil Tillage Res. 2005;83:1–8
  25. Garrain, D., P. Martinez, and R. Vidal. 2007. LCA of thermoplastics recycling. In Proc. 3rd International Conference of Life Cycle Assessment. Zurich, Austria. http://www.lcm2007.org/paper/168.pdf Accessed July 9, 2008.
  26. Graboski, M. 2002. Fossil Energy Use in the Manufacture of Corn Ethanol. National Corn Growers Association, Chesterfield, MO. http://www.ncga.com/ethanol/pdfs/energy_balance_report_final_R1.PDF Accessed July 9, 2008.
  27. Griffin TS, He S, Honeycutt CW. Manure composition affects net transformation of nitrogen from dairy manures. Plant Soil. 2003;273:29–38
  28. IPCC. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001;
  29. IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories. Vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html Accessed November 26, 2008.
  30. IPCC. 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Chapter 2 in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf Accessed November 28, 2008.
  31. Jarvis SC, Lovell RD, Panayides R. Patterns of methane emission from excreta of grazing animals. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1995;27:1581–1588
  32. Kirchgessner M, Windisch W, Müller HL, Kreuzer M. Release of methane and of carbon dioxide by dairy cattle. Agribiol. Res. 1991;44:91–102
  33. Kitzes J, Wackernagel M, Loh J, Peller A, Goldfinger S, Cheng D, et al. Shrink and share: Humanity's present and future ecological footprint. Phil. Trans. Biol. Sci. 2008;363:467–475
  34. Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Phil. Trans. Biol. Sci. 2008;363:815–830
  35. Lee J, Cho H, Sung J, Lee S, Shin M. Life cycle assessment of tractors (Korean example). LCA Case Studies. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2000;5:205–208
  36. Ludington, D., and E. L. Johnson. 2003. Dairy Farm Energy Audit Summary. FlexTech Services, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, NY. http://www.nyserda.org/publications/dairyfarmenergysummary.pdf Accessed May 18, 2009.
  37. Mills JAN, Kebreab E, Yates CM, Crompton LA, Cammell SB, Dhanoa MS, et al. Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81:3141–3150
  38. Monteny GJ, Groenestein CM, Hilhorst MA. Interactions and coupling between emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from animal husbandry. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2001;60:123–132
  39. Nagy, C. 1999. Energy Coefficients for Agriculture Inputs in Western Canada. Canadian Agricultural Energy End-Use Data Analysis Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. http://www.csale.usask.ca/PDFDocuments/energyCoefficientsAg.pdf Accessed July 9, 2008.
  40. NRC. Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge, Future Needs. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Sci.; 2003;
  41. Olesen JE, Schelde K, Weiske A, Weisbjerg MR, Asman WAH, Djurhuus J. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006;112:207–220
  42. Patzek T. Thermodynamics of the corn-ethanol biofuel cycle. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2004;23:519–567
  43. Paustian K, Andrén O, Janzen H, Lal R, Smith P, Tian G, et al. Agricultural soils as a sink to mitigate CO2 emissions. Soil Use Manage. 1997;13:230–244
  44. Pennsylvania Agricultural Statistics Service (PASS). 2008. Pennsylvania Agricultural Statistics, Prices Received. http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/index2.jsp Accessed January 10, 2009.
  45. Phetteplace HW, Johnson DE, Seidl AF. Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2001;60:99–102
  46. Pimentel D. Energy inputs for the production, formulation, packaging and transport of various pesticides. In:  Pimentel D editors. Handbook of Energy Utilization in Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc; 1980;p. 45–48
  47. Rotz CA. Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 2004;82(E-Suppl.):E119–E137
  48. Rotz, C. A., M. S. Corson, D. S. Chianese, and C. U. Coiner. 2009. Integrated Farm System Model: Reference Manual. Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, University Park, PA. http://ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/19020000/ifsmreference.pdf Accessed August 31, 2008.
  49. Rotz CA, Mertens DR, Buckmaster DR, Allen MS, Harrison JH. A dairy herd model for use in whole farm simulations. J. Dairy Sci. 1999;82:2826–2840
  50. Savoie P, Jofriet JC. Silage storage. In:  Buxton DR,  Muck RE,  Harrison JH editor. Silage Science and Technology. Agronomy monograph 42. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy; 2003;p. 405–467
  51. Schmer M, Vogel K, Mitchell R, Perrin R. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. Sci. Am. 2008;105:464–469
  52. Schroll H. Energy flow and ecological sustainability in Danish agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1994;51:301–310
  53. Sherlock RR, Sommer SG, Khan RZ, Wood CW, Guertal EA, Freney JR, et al. Emission of ammonia, methane and nitrous oxide from pig slurry applied to a pasture in New Zealand. J. Environ. Qual. 2002;31:1491–1501
  54. Sommer SG, Petersen SO, Møller HB. Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2004;69:143–154
  55. Sommer SG, Sherlock RR, Khan RZ. Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from pig slurry amended soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1996;28:1541–1544
  56. Thomassen MA, van Calker KJ, Smits MCJ, Iepema GL, de Boer IJM. Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands. Agric. Syst. 2008;96:95–107
  57. USDA. 2005. USDA National Nutrient Database. Release 18. http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR18/reports/sr18page.htm Accessed October 30, 2009.
  58. Verge XPC, Dyer JA, Desjardins RL, Worth D. Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001. Agric. Syst. 2007;94:683–693
  59. Wang, M. 2007. GREET. Version 1.8a. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL. http://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/GREET/ Accessed January, 2008.
  60. West T, Marland G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: Comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002;91:217–232
  61. Wilkerson VA, Casper DP, Mertens DR. The prediction of methane production of Holstein cows by several equations. J. Dairy Sci. 1995;78:2402–2414
  62. Wu, M., M. Wang, and H. Huo. 2006. Fuel-Cycle Assessment of Selected Bioethanol Production Pathways in the United States. ANL/ESD/06–7. Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL. http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/377.pdf Accessed July 9, 2008.
  63. Yamulki S, Jarvis SC, Owen P. Methane emission and uptake from soils as influenced by excreta deposition from grazing animals. J. Environ. Qual. 1999;28:676–682

PII: S0022-0302(10)00094-9

doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2162

Journal of Dairy Science
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 1266-1282 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution