If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
We recently reported that cellobiose 2-epimerase from Ruminococcus albus effectively converted lactose to epilactose. In this study, we examined the biological effects of epilactose on intestinal microbiota, bile acid metabolism, and postadministrative plasma glucose by animal tests. Dietary supplementation with epilactose or fructooligosaccharide (4.5% each) increased cecal wall weight and cecal contents and decreased the pH of the cecal contents in Wistar-ST rats. The number of total anaerobes tended to be greater in rats fed epilactose and fructooligosaccharide than in those fed the control diet. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria were more numerous in rats fed epilactose and fructooligosaccharide diets than in those fed the control diet. Analysis of clone libraries of 16S rRNA suggests that supplementation with epilactose did not induce the proliferation of harmful bacteria belonging to classes Clostridia or Bacteroidetes. Epilactose, as well as fructooligosaccharide, inhibited the conversion of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids, which are suggested to be promoters of colon cancer. In addition, oral administration of epilactose did not elevate the plasma glucose concentration in ddY mice. These results clearly indicate that epilactose is a promising prebiotic. We also showed that cellobiose 2-epimerase converted lactose in cow milk and a spray-dried ultrafiltrate of cheese whey to epilactose. Cellobiose 2-epimerase may increase the value of dairy products by changing lactose to epilactose possessing prebiotic properties.
), cheese whey is not effectively used. Lactose is the main solid constituent of cheese whey, and its concentration in cow milk reaches 4.4%. Although direct utilization of lactose is thought to be difficult because of its low sweetening power and solubility, various attempts have been made to increase the use of cheese whey. Enzymatic hydrolysis of lactose by β-galactosidase has been used industrially to produce food materials or microbial substrates (
). Lactulose specifically promotes the intestinal proliferation of bifidobacteria, which is known to be a very important humanizing factor in infant formula, and it has been added to commercial infant products (
Some bacteria, such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp., which have been described as living microorganisms exerting health benefits, exemplify the concept of probiotics (
). For example, fructooligosaccharide (FOS), a polymer of fructose found in artichokes, leeks, asparagus, onions, and bananas and one of the most widely used nondigestive oligosaccharides, stimulates the growth of fecal bifidobacteria in healthy human subjects (
A combination of dietary fructooligosaccharides and isoflavone conjugates increases femoral bone mineral density and equol production in ovariectomized mice.
). Several studies indicate that through fortification with beneficial microflora, prebiotics may enhance the defense mechanisms of host animals, increase resistance to various health challenges, and accelerate recovery from gastrointestinal tract disturbances (
described an enzyme activity in the culture broth of Ruminococcus albus 7 (ATCC 27210T) that mediates the epimerization of cellobiose and named it cellobiose 2-epimerase (CE, EC 5.1.3.11). This enzyme epimerizes cellobiose and generates 4-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-d-mannose in a reversible manner.
described the purification of CE from R. albus NE1 and the cloning and sequencing of the corresponding gene. We recently reported that CE from R. albus NE1 reacts not only with cellooligosaccharides but also with lactose, yielding 4-O-β-d-galactopyranosyl-d-mannose (epilactose;
), its biological activities have not yet been clarified to date. The aim of this work was to evaluate the biological activities of epilactose, which was easily synthesized from lactose by the action of CE.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of Epilactose
Lactose was treated with recombinant CE according to the method of
. Epilactose was separated from the resulting reaction mixture by HPLC. A Shodex Sugar SP0810 column (8.0 × 300 mm, Shodex, Tokyo, Japan) was used, and elution was done with distilled water. The fractions containing epilactose were collected and lyophilized. For rat feeding, 90% pure epilactose was used, and >98% pure epilactose was used for the other experiments.
Feeding Study of Rats
Casein and sucrose were purchased from the New Zealand Dairy Board (ALACID, Wellington, New Zealand) and Nihon Beet Sugar Manufacturing Co. (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. Lactose, l-cystine, choline bitartrate, and t-butylhydroquinone were the products of Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Corn oil, crystalline cellulose, and FOS (Meioligo P) were purchased from Ajinomoto Co. (Tokyo, Japan), Advantec Toyo (Tokyo, Japan), and Meiji Foodmateria (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
Four-week-old male Wistar-ST rats were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan) and housed in individual cages in a temperature-controlled room (23 ± 2°C) with a dark period from 2000 to 0800 h. They were allowed free access to an AIN93G composition diet (
AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet.
) and water before the experiment. After consuming the AIN93G diet for 5 d, rats weighing 113.6 ± 0.9 g (n = 24) were divided into 4 groups of 6 animals. Each group of rats was fed the control, lactose, epilactose, or FOS diet. The diet compositions were based on the report of
except for adding 5% of crystalline cellulose. The lactose, epilactose, and FOS diets were prepared by adding 50 g of lactose or epilactose or 45 g of FOS to each kilogram of the control diet by substituting for sucrose, respectively. To adjust the lactose concentrations of the control, epilactose, and FOS diets, 5 g of lactose per kilogram was substituted for sucrose in the control and FOS diets. Rats were fed each diet ad libitum for 15 d, and then they were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of Nembutal (sodium pentobarbital, 50 mg/kg of BW; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL). After laparotomy, rats were killed by bleeding from the abdominal aorta. Proximal and distal sites of the cecum were tied, and cecum with its contents was removed.
Animal tests were approved by the Hokkaido University Animal Use Committee, and animals were maintained in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals at Hokkaido University.
Quantification of Intestinal Bacteria by Culture Method
Total anaerobes of rat cecal contents were quantified according to the method of
. Briefly, cecal contents were immediately diluted in 10-fold steps with anaerobic phosphate buffer, and 50 μL of each dilution was inoculated on BL agar (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) containing 5% (vol/vol) horse blood (Nihon Biotest, Tokyo, Japan). The plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 24 h by the gas pack method, and the number of colonies formed was counted.
Quantification of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacilli by Real-Time PCR
Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from cecal contents using a Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (MO Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA;
) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Amplification and detection of cecal DNA were performed with a Smart Cycler II (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) according to our previous report (
Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR.
Analysis of the 16S rRNA Sequences of Cecal Bacteria
Cecal DNA samples were pooled and used as a template to amplify the fragments of 16S rRNA with the universal primers U968 (AAC GCG AAG AAC CTT AC) and L1401 (CGG TGT GTA CAA GAC CC) (
Mucosa-associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces.
). Polymerase chain reaction was performed in a reaction volume of 25 μL that contained 500 nM each of U968 and L1401, 1 × PCR buffer, 0.2 mM each of deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1.25 U of Taq-HS polymerase (Takara, Otsu, Japan). The reaction conditions were 94°C for 5 min, followed by 12 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 56°C for 20 s, and 68°C for 40 s, and final extension at 68°C for 7 min. The amplicons were purified by a GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ;
) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Competent Escherichia coli XL-1 Blue cells were transformed with the constructed vectors, and the transformants were plated onto Luria-Bertani agar plates supplemented with 25 μg/mL of ampicillin, 30 μg/mL of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside, and 20 μg/mL of isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside and incubated overnight at 37°C. White colonies were picked up and grown on Luria-Bertani agar. Plasmid DNA was amplified with an Illustra TempliPhi DNA amplification Kit (GE Healthcare Bioscience;
) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Resulting amplicons were sequenced by using an ABI3730XL or ABI3730 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with M13-F (GTT TTC CCA GTC ACG ACG TT) as the sequencing primer.
All sequences were examined for possible chimeric artifacts by the CHECK CHIMERA program of the Ribosomal Database Project (
). Classification of bacteria based on their sequences was done by the Classifier program of Ribosomal Database Project, setting the threshold value at 80%.
Analysis of Bile Acids
Cholic acid, deoxycholic acid (DCA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), lithocholic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, and hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). α-Muricholic acid (MCA) and β-MCA were obtained from Steraloids (Newport, RI), and 23-nordeoxycholic acid (NDCA) was from ICN Biomedicals (Costa Mesa, CA).
Concentrations of bile acids in cecal contents were determined by the method of
Effects of difructose anhydride III (DFA III) administration on bile acids and growth of DFA III-assimilating bacterium Ruminococcus productus on rat intestine.
with modifications. Briefly, homogenized cecal contents (approximately 50 mg) were suspended in 1.5 mL of ethanol containing 1M NaOH and 50 nmol of NDCA (internal standard), and bile acids were extracted twice at 80°C for 1 h. The resulting extracts were applied to an Oasis HLB column (Japan Waters, Tokyo, Japan) and eluted by ethanol. The eluates were methylated with trimethylsilyl-diazomethane and then silylated with BSA+TMCS+TMSI (Sigma). Injections were made at 270°C, and derivatized bile acids were separated and quantified by GC-MS (1200L; Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a capillary column (TC-5, 30 m × 0.25 mm; GL Science, Tokyo, Japan), using purified helium gas as a carrier gas. The column temperature was programmed to remain at 240°C for 2 min, to increase to 290°C at a rate of 10°C/min, and then remain at 290°C for 25 min. The ions selected for the different bile acids were m/z 253, 368 for cholic acid; m/z 255, 370 for DCA; m/z 355, 370 for CDCA; m/z 215, 372 for lithocholic acid; m/z 370, 460 for ursodeoxycholic acid; m/z 405, 460 for HDCA; m/z 443, 458 for α-MCA; m/z 195, 285 for β-MCA; and m/z 255, 356 for NDCA. Quantification was carried out by a correction factor obtained using NDCA as an internal standard.
Plasma Glucose Changes After Oral Epilactose Administration in Mice
Plasma glucose concentrations after oral epilactose administration were determined essentially by the method of
Comparison of efficacies of a dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor and α-glucosidase inhibitors in oral carbohydrate and meal tolerance tests and the effects of their combination in mice.
. Five-week-old female ddY mice were purchased from Japan SLC and housed in standard plastic cages in a temperature-controlled room (23 ± 2°C). They were allowed free access to commercial chow (Labo MR Stock, Nihon Nosan Kogo Co., Yokohama, Japan) and water. After an overnight fasting, they were orally administered 0.15 mmol of epilactose or lactose dissolved in 200 μL of tap water. Blood was collected from the tail vein 30, 60, and 120 min after the administration, and the plasma glucose concentration was determined by using a commercial glucose oxidase kit (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
CE Treatment of Cow Milk and Cheese Whey
Purification of recombinant CE of R. albus NE1 was performed according to the method of
. Cow milk was purchased from a retail source, and a spray-dried ultrafiltrate of cheese whey (permeate) was kindly provided by Meiji Dairies Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Ten milliliters of 1% (wt/vol) permeate (adjusted pH to 7.5 by NaOH) and cow milk were each treated with 20 μL of recombinant CE (containing 30 μg of purified CE) at 10°C. One, 3, 5, and 10 h after starting the reaction, aliquots of the reactant were removed and immediately boiled for 5 min. The reaction mixtures (1 μL each) were spotted onto a thin-layer chromatography plate (Silica gel 60; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and developed in a solvent system of 2-propanol/1-butanol/H2O (12:3:4, by volume). The chromatogram was developed by color reaction with the anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid procedure.
Statistical Analyses
Results are presented as means ± standard error of the means. The paired and unpaired t-test or Tukey-Kramer test after 1-way ANOVA was used to compare mean values. Data analysis was performed with Stat-View for Macintosh (version 5.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Feeding Study of Rats
BW Change and Food Intake
The initial BW of the 4 groups were the same and averaged 113.6 ± 0.9 g. Body weight gains over 15 d were the same, 99.8 ± 4.8 g, 100.6 ± 4.0 g, 104.0 ± 2.7 g, and 104.1 ± 4.3 g, for rats fed the control, lactose, epilactose, and FOS diets, respectively. Total food intakes over 15 d were the same, 259.3 ± 7.3 g, 260.0 ± 4.7 g, 257.7 ± 7.4 g, and 258.8 ± 3.5 g, for rats fed the control, lactose, epilactose, and FOS diets, respectively. Average intake was calculated to be 4.76 g/kg of BW per day for epilactose and 4.75 g/kg of BW per day for FOS.
Cecal Fermentation Parameters
Cecal wall weights of rats fed the epilactose and FOS diets were 3.8 ± 0.2 and 3.5 ± 0.2 g/kg of BW, respectively, and they were significantly greater than those of rats fed the control (2.3 ± 0.2 g/kg of BW) and lactose (2.4 ± 0.1 g/kg of BW) diets. Cecal content weights of rats fed the epilactose and FOS diets were 22.9 ± 0.9 and 16.7 ± 1.8 g/kg of BW, respectively, and they were significantly greater than those of rats fed the control (7.8 ± 0.9 g/kg of BW) and lactose (10.0 ± 1.1 g/kg of BW) diets. The cecal content pH values of rats fed the epilactose and FOS diets were 6.61 ± 0.22 and 6.88 ± 0.22, respectively, and they were significantly lower than those of rats fed the control (7.57 ± 0.04) and lactose (7.54 ± 0.08) diets.
Cecal Bacteria Numbers
Quantification of total cecal anaerobes was performed by a culture method, and quantification of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria was performed by real-time PCR using genus-specific primers. The numbers of total cecal anaerobes in epilactose-fed rats tended to be greater, and those in FOS-fed rats were significantly greater than those in control rats (Figure 1A). The numbers of cecal lactobacilli in epilactose- and FOS-fed rats were significantly greater than those in control rats (Figure 1B). Detectable concentrations of bifidobacteria were observed in all cecal DNA samples from epilactose- and FOS-fed rats, although they were at low concentrations in 5 out of 6 samples from control rats and in 4 out of 6 samples from lactose-fed rats. The logarithmic cecal bifidobacteria numbers of rats fed the epilactose and FOS diets reached 7.80 ± 0.28 and 8.68 ± 0.24 copies/g, respectively, and they were significantly greater than those fed the control and lactose diets (Figure 1C).
Figure 1Numbers of total (A) anaerobes, (B) lactobacilli, and (C) bifidobacteria in the cecal contents of rats fed the control (Con), lactose (Lac), epilactose (Epi), or fructooligosaccharide (FOS) diet. Quantification of total anaerobes was done by a culture method, whereas quantification of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria was done by real-time PCR. Numbers of total anaerobes, lactobacilli, and bifidobacteria are shown as logarithmic colony-forming units per gram and logarithmic copies per gram, respectively. Different letters show significant differences among the groups.
For the comparison of intestinal microbiota, 16S rRNA libraries were constructed from cecal DNA of rats using universally conserved 16S rRNA-targeted primers. Eighty-eight, 111, 98, and 100 clones were randomly selected from the libraries of control, lactose-, epilactose-, and FOS-fed rats, respectively, and their sequences were determined. Based on the sequence similarities, the clones were classified into several clusters corresponding to classes of the domain Bacteria (Table 1). The populations of clones classified into the classes δ-Proteobacteria and Clostridia tended to be smaller in epilactose- and FOS-fed rats than in control and lactose-fed rats. On the other hand, the populations of the classes Bacilli and Actinobacteria tended to be greater in epilactose- and FOS-fed rats than in control and lactose-fed rats.
Table 1Distribution of 16S rRNA in cecal samples of rats fed the control, lactose, epilactose, or fructooligosaccharide (FOS) diet
Concentrations of primary and secondary bile acids in cecal contents were determined by GC-MS after derivatization (Table 2). Cecal α-MCA was significantly greater in rats fed lactose, epilactose, and FOS diets than that in those fed the control diet. Cecal β-MCA of lactose-fed rats tended to be greater and that of epilactose- and FOS-fed rats was significantly greater than that of control rats. The sum of the primary bile acids determined was significantly greater in rats fed lactose, epilactose, and FOS diets than in those fed the control diet. Cecal DCA was significantly greater in lactose- and epilactose-fed rats than that in control rats. Negligible concentrations of HDCA were observed in epilactose- and FOS-fed rats, although detectable concentrations were observed in control and lactose-fed rats. The sum of the secondary bile acids was significantly greater in rats fed the lactose diet than in those fed the control, epilactose, and FOS diets. The ratio of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids was significantly greater in epilactose- and FOS-fed rats than that in control and lactose-fed rats.
Plasma Glucose Change After Oral Administration in Mice
Epilactose or lactose was administered orally to mice, and the time course of changes in the plasma glucose concentration was determined (Figure 2). Plasma glucose concentrations before oral administration were almost the same in both groups of mice. In the lactose-administered mice, significant elevations in plasma glucose were observed at 30 and 60 min, but the concentration returned to normal at 120 min. In contrast, oral epilactose administration did not induce a significant change in plasma glucose at least up to 120 min after administration.
Figure 2Time course of plasma glucose concentrations in ddY mice after oral administration of epilactose (open circles) or lactose (filled circles). Female ddY mice were orally administered 0.15 mmol of epilactose or lactose dissolved in 200 μL of tap water, and plasma glucose concentrations were determined 30, 60, and 120 min after the administration. Asterisks show significant differences when compared with 0 min.
Cow milk and permeate were treated with recombinant CE, and the products were determined by thin-layer chromatography. The spots corresponding to epilactose increased with reaction time when both cow milk and permeate were treated with CE (Figure 3). Under the standard conditions of enzyme assay, the reaction reached equilibration with conversion rate from lactose to epilactose of approximately 40%, which is almost the same as the value obtained with lactose and CE from R. albus NE1 (
Figure 3Thin-layer chromatography profiles of cellobiose 2-epimerase (CE) products of (A) dairy milk and (B) permeate. Cow milk and permeate were treated with CE at 10°C for 1, 3, 5, and 10 h. The chromatograms were developed by the anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid procedure. Lac = CE product of lactose. Arrows show the spots corresponding to epilactose.
Prebiotics are compounds, usually carbohydrates, that are resistant to direct metabolism by the host and reach the lower gastrointestinal tract where they are preferentially utilized by selected groups of beneficial bacteria such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (
). In this study, we examined the biological activities of epilactose with lactose and FOS as references, using Wistar-ST rats. There were no significant differences in food intake and BW gain among all groups of rats, and average epilactose and FOS intake was 4.76 and 4.75 g/kg of BW per day, respectively. In addition, epilactose has no toxic effect as far as 4.76 g/kg of BW per day (data not shown). Importantly, the feeding study revealed that supplementation of epilactose induced proliferation not only of total anaerobes but also of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the cecum (Figure 1). We reported that epilactose resists gastrointestinal digestion in vitro (
), suggesting that epilactose reaches the lower gastrointestinal tract without being digested, where it is utilized by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. Further, ingestion of epilactose did not induce an increase of harmful bacteria belonging to the classes Clostridia and Bacteroidetes (Table 1). These results suggest that epilactose, like FOS, changes the intestinal flora in a beneficial way. It is well known that bifidobacteria and lactobacilli ferment various kinds of sugars to produce organic acids (
). Indeed, in FOS- as well as epilactose-fed rats, cecal wall weights and cecal content weights were significantly greater than those in control and lactose-fed rats. These results suggest that cecal epithelial cells are proliferated by short-chain fatty acids, which are derived from alteration in intestinal microbiota by epilactose and FOS.
Primary bile acids were significantly greater in rats fed lactose, epilactose, and FOS diets than in those fed the control diet (Table 2). Secondary bile acids were almost the same in rats fed the control, epilactose, and FOS diets, although significantly greater amounts were observed in rats fed the lactose diet. These results suggest that supplementation of the diet with lactose, epilactose, or FOS increases bile acid synthesis in the liver, increases enterohepatic circulation of bile acids, or both, and that supplementation with epilactose or FOS inhibits the conversion of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids by intestinal bacteria. It has been reported that the major biliary bile acids in rats are tauroconjugated cholic acid, CDCA, α-MCA, and β-MCA (
Formation of hyodeoxycholic acid from muricholic acid and hyocholic acid by an unidentified gram-positive rod termed HDCA-1 isolated from rat intestinal microflora.
Formation of hyodeoxycholic acid from muricholic acid and hyocholic acid by an unidentified gram-positive rod termed HDCA-1 isolated from rat intestinal microflora.
reported that an unidentified gram-positive rod, HDCA-1, whose 16S rRNA sequence showed the greatest similarity to that of Termitobacter aceticus (89.6%), converted β-MCA to HDCA and that the monointroduction of strain HDCA-1 into germ-free rats facilitated the conversion of β-MCA to HDCA. In the present study, cecal HDCA concentrations in rats fed the epilactose and FOS diets were under the detection limit, but a significant increase of cecal β-MCA was observed in these rats (Table 2). In addition, clone library analysis of 16S rRNA revealed that the class Clostridia tended to be fewer in these rats than in the control and lactose-fed rats (Table 2). In rats fed the epilactose and FOS diets, the cecal content pH was below 7, in which the proliferation of strain HDCA-1 was completely abolished (
Formation of hyodeoxycholic acid from muricholic acid and hyocholic acid by an unidentified gram-positive rod termed HDCA-1 isolated from rat intestinal microflora.
). These results suggest that epilactose decreases the population of the class Clostridia, which possesses the ability to convert β-MCA to HDCA. Secondary bile acids are cytotoxic to colon cells and have been implicated as tumor promoters (
Effect of dietary deoxycholic acid and cholesterol on fecal steroid concentration and its impact on the colonic crypt cell proliferation in azoxymethane-treated rats.
reported that ingestion of a nondigestible oligosaccharide decreased the conversion to secondary bile acids and decreased 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced precancerous colon lesions in rats. Taken together, it is possible that ingestion of epilactose suppresses colon cancer by inhibiting the formation of secondary bile acid by the change in intestinal microbiota.
Oral administration of epilactose did not elevate plasma glucose concentrations in mice (Figure 2). It is easily understood that epilactose may not elevate plasma glucose in rats, because it is resistant to intestinal enzymes of rats (
). The synthetic protocol for the production of lactulose includes expensive separation and purification steps to remove by-products, because alkaline or complex reagents such as aluminate and borate are used (
). In contrast, the reaction mixture of CE contains only epilactose and lactose as sugar ingredients. This means that CE converted part of the lactose in cow milk or a spray-dried ultrafiltrate of cheese whey to epilactose without any purification steps (Figure 3). Thus, CE can increase the values of lactose, cheese whey, and milk by preparing novel dairy products having prebiotic properties.
Acknowledgements
Purified epilactose was kindly provided by M. Takada and T. Nakakuki of Nihon Shokuhin Kako Co. Ltd. This study was supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology and by a National Project “Knowledge Cluster Initiative” (second stage, “Sapporo Biocluster Bio-S”) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
Formation of hyodeoxycholic acid from muricholic acid and hyocholic acid by an unidentified gram-positive rod termed HDCA-1 isolated from rat intestinal microflora.
Effect of dietary deoxycholic acid and cholesterol on fecal steroid concentration and its impact on the colonic crypt cell proliferation in azoxymethane-treated rats.
Effects of difructose anhydride III (DFA III) administration on bile acids and growth of DFA III-assimilating bacterium Ruminococcus productus on rat intestine.
A combination of dietary fructooligosaccharides and isoflavone conjugates increases femoral bone mineral density and equol production in ovariectomized mice.
AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet.
Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR.
Comparison of efficacies of a dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor and α-glucosidase inhibitors in oral carbohydrate and meal tolerance tests and the effects of their combination in mice.
Mucosa-associated bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract are uniformly distributed along the colon and differ from the community recovered from feces.