Advertisement
Article| Volume 84, ISSUE 6, P1508-1515, June 2001

Download started.

Ok

The Relationship Between Body Condition Score and Reproductive Performance

Open ArchiveDOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70184-1
The Relationship Between Body Condition Score and Reproductive Performance
Previous ArticleRelationships of Sire Predicted Transmitting Ability for Somatic Cell Score with Measures of Daughter Performance
Next ArticleDetection of Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Milk Production Traits on 10 Chromosomes in Holstein Cattle
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between measures of body condition score collected from calving until wk 26 of lactation and reproductive measures (calving interval, days to first heat, days to first service, and conception at first service). Since 1973 sires of cows at the Langhill Dairy Cattle Research Centre have been selected for either high (selection line) or average (control line) genetic merit for fat plus protein. The data included 1211 records from 534 cows calving from 1988 to 1999. At first calving, cows were randomly assigned to one of two ad libitum diets: one that was relatively high in concentrates (∼3000 kg/yr) and one that was relatively low in concentrates (∼1500 kg/yr). Selection line cows were on average thinner and lost more condition in early lactation than control line cows. Cows that lost condition, those that were thinner than average at wk 10 of lactation and those that were thinner on average over the first 10 wk, had poorer reproductive performance. This effect was greatest in the selection line. Line × diet interaction effects were not statistically significant. Genetic correlations between body condition score and reproductive measures were unfavorable and ranged from −0.04 to −0.54. The relationship between body condition score and production was strong, but, even after adjusting for yield, an unfavorable relationship still exists between body condition score and fertility. Body condition score could be used as a management and selection tool to improve reproductive performance.

      Key words

      References

        • Berglund B.
        • Danell B.
        Live weight changes, feed consumption, milk-yield and energy-balance in dairy-cattle during the 1st period of lactation.
        Acta Agric. Scand. Section A. 1987; 37: 495-509
        • Butler W.R.
        • Everett R.W.
        • Coppock C.E.
        The relationship between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in postpartum Holstein cows.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1981; 53: 742-748
        • Darwash A.O.
        • Lamming G.E.
        • Woolliams J.A.
        The phenotypic association between interval to post-partum ovulation and traditional measures of fertility in dairy cattle.
        Anim. Sci. 1997; 65: 9-16
        • Darwash A.O.
        • Lamming G.E.
        • Woolliams J.A.
        Estimation of genetic variation in the interval from calving to postpartum ovulation of dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1997; 80: 1227-1234
        • Groeneveld E.
        • Kovac M.
        A generalized computing procedure for setting up and sorting mixed linear models.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1990; 73: 513-531
        • Hoekstra J.
        • Van der lugt A.W.
        • Van der werf J.H.J.
        • Ouweltjes W.
        Genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk production and fertility traits in upgraded dairy cattle.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1994; 40: 225-232
        • Jones H.E.
        • White I.M.S.
        • Brotherstone S.
        Genetic evaluation of Holstein Friesian sires for daughter condition score changes using a random regression model.
        Anim. Sci. 1999; 68: 467-476
        • Koenen E.P.C.
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        Genetic covariance functions for live weight, condition score and dry-matter intake measured at different lactation stages of Holstein Friesian heifers.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1999; 57: 67-77
        • Komaragiri M.V.S.
        • Erdman R.A.
        Factors affecting body tissue mobilization in early lactation dairy cows. 1. Effect of dietary protein on mobilization of body fat and protein.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1997; 80: 929-937

      10. Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1993. Genstat 5 Version 4.1 Clarendon Press, London.

      11. Lowman, B. G., N. Scott, and S. Somerville. 1976. Condition Scoring of Cattle rev. ed. Bull. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, No. 6.

        • Madgwick P.P.
        • Beard K.A.
        • Goddard M.E.
        Possibilities for incorporating selection for feed efficiency into the national Dairy Herd Improvement Program.
        in: Proceedings of the 9th Mtng. Assoc. Advance, Anim. Breeding Genetics, Australia1991: 45-58

      13. Nielsen, B. L. 1999. Perceived welfare issues in dairy cattle, with special emphasis on metabolic stress Pages 1–8 in Metabolic Stress in Dairy Cows. J. D. Oldham, G. Simm, A. F. Groen, B. L. Nielsen, J. E. Pryce, and T.L.J. Lawrence, ed. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occasional Publ. 24.

        • Pryce J.E.
        • Coffey M.P.
        • Brotherstone S.
        The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2000; 83: 2664-2671
        • Pryce J.E.
        • Esslemont R.J.
        • Thompson R.
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        • Kossaibati M.A.
        • Simm G.
        Estimation of genetic parameters using health, fertility and production data from a management recording system for dairy cattle.
        Anim. Sci. 1998; 66: 577-584

      16. Pryce J. E., and P. Løvendahl. 1999. Options to reduce vulnerability to metabolic stress by genetic selection Pages 119–128 in Metabolic Stress in Dairy Cows. J. D. Oldham, G. Simm, A. F. Groen, B. L. Nielsen, J. E. Pryce, and T.L.J. Lawrence, eds. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occasional Publ. 24.

        • Pryce J.E.
        • Nielsen B.L.
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        • Simm G.
        Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility in dairy cattle.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1999; 57: 193-201
        • Pryce J.E.
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        • Thompson R.
        • Hill W.G.
        • Simm G.
        Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.
        Anim. Sci. 1997; 65: 353-360

      19. Reynolds, C. K., and D. E. Beever. 1995. Energy requirements and responses: a UK perspective. Pages 31–41 in Breeding and Feeding the High Genetic Merit Dairy Cow. T.L.J. Lawrence, F. J. Gordon, and A. Carson, eds. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occasional Publ. No. 19.

        • Van Arendonk J.A.M.
        • Nieuwhof G.J.
        • Vos H.
        • Korver S.
        Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1991; 29: 263-275
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: a review.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1998; 81: 1109-1119
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        • Brotherstone S.
        Genetic correlations between linear type traits, food intake, liveweight and condition score in Holstein Friesian cattle.
        Anim. Sci. 1997; 64: 385-392
        • Veerkamp R.F.
        • Emmans G.
        Sources of energetic efficiency of dairy cows.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1995; 44: 87-97

      24. Veerkamp, R. F., G. Simm., and J. D. Oldham. 1995. Genotype by environment interaction—experience from Langhill. Pages 59– 66 in Breeding and Feeding the High Genetic Merit Dairy Cow. T.L.J. Lawrence, F. J. Gordon, and A. Carson, eds. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occasional Publ. No. 19.

        • Veerkamp R.F.
        • Oldenbroek J.K.
        • Van der Gaast H.J.
        • Van der Werf J.H.J.
        Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance and live weights.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2000; 83: 577-583

      26. Veerkamp, R. F., and R. Thompson. 1999. Multitrait covariance functions to estimate genetic correlations between milk yield, dry-matter intake and live weight during lactation. Pages 147–151 in Metabolic Stress in Dairy Cows. J. D. Oldham, G. Simm, A. F. Groen, B. L. Nielsen, J. E. Pryce, and T.L.J. Lawrence, eds. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. Occasional Publ. No. 24.

      Article info

      Publication history

      Accepted: December 20, 2000
      Received: January 18, 2000

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70184-1

      Copyright

      © 2001 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      User license

      Elsevier user license |
      How you can reuse Information Icon
      Elsevier user license

      Permitted

      For non-commercial purposes:

      • Read, print & download
      • Text & data mine
      • Translate the article

      Not Permitted

      • Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
      • Redistribute or republish the final article
      • Sell or re-use for commercial purposes

      Elsevier's open access license policy

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX