Abstract
Key words
Introduction
FAO. 2010. FAOSTAT. Accessed April 14, 2010. http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/DesktopDefault.aspx.
Materials and Methods
Animals, Design, Diets, and Feeding
Item | Diet | SEM | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
L | H | Concentrate | ||
Ingredients (g/100 g of DM) | ||||
Forage | 65 | 30 | ||
Grass hay | 29.9 | 13.8 | ||
Dehydrated alfalfa | 35.1 | 16.2 | ||
Concentrate | 35 | 70 | ||
Commercial concentrate | 20 | 50 | ||
Sugar beet pulp silage | 7 | 20 | ||
Calcium palm oil salt | 1.4 | — | ||
Soybean meal | 6.6 | — | ||
Chemical composition (g/100 g of DM) | ||||
CP | 16.7 | 17.7 | 0.37 | 0.18 |
NDF | 40.9 | 36.0 | 1.47 | 0.04 |
ADF | 24.4 | 20.1 | 0.97 | 0.01 |
Acid detergent lignin | 3.89 | 2.97 | 0.303 | 0.06 |
Starch | 4.38 | 9.70 | — | — |
Ash | 8.47 | 8.37 | 0.202 | 0.72 |
Fatty acid (FA) | 2.33 | 2.81 | 0.750 | 0.04 |
Total FA (g/100 g of FA) | ||||
C12:0–C15:0 | 1.89 | 0.78 | 0.078 | 0.01 |
C16:0 | 37.3 | 16.41 | 0.070 | <0.001 |
C18:0 | 4.5 | 3.41 | 0.029 | 0.001 |
cis-9 C18:1 | 23.5 | 29.2 | 0.17 | 0.002 |
cis-9,12 C18:2 | 17.3 | 33.1 | 0.05 | <0.001 |
cis-9,12,15 C18:3 | 9.2 | 10.4 | 0.05 | 0.003 |
C20:0–C24:0 | 1.47 | 1.45 | 0.031 | 0.70 |
Nutritive value | ||||
Electrolytic balance (mEq/kg of DM) | 500 | 419 | ||
Net energy (MJ/kg of DM) | 5.88 | 6.75 | ||
PDIN, (g/kg of DM) | 113 | 114 | ||
PDIE, (g/kg of DM) | 104 | 114 |
Animal Performance
Patterns of DMI, Ruminal Fermentation, and Plasma Concentrations After Feeding
In Situ Ruminal Degradability of Substrate
Whole-Tract Digestibility
Analytical Procedures
Calculations and Statistical Analysis
where A is the asymptote, A × B the slope of the curve, and t the time after feeding.
where a is the soluble fraction (% of total DM, NDF, ADF, or starch), b the degradable fraction (% of total DM, NDF, ADF, or starch), t the time of rumen incubation (h), and c the relative rate of degradation of fraction b (h−1). Nonlinear parameters a, b, and c were estimated using the NLIN procedure of SAS (
where k is the estimated rate of outflow from the rumen, fixed at 0.06 h−1 (
Results
Chemical Composition and Nutritive Values of the Diets
DMI
Item | Diet | SEM | P-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | H | C | W | C × W | ||
Intake and BW | ||||||
DMI (kg/d) | 2.68 | 2.98 | 0.105 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.09 |
DMI (g/kg of BW per day) | 42.1 | 45.7 | 1.33 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
BW (kg) | 63.0 | 66.1 | 1.59 | 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.72 |
Milk production and composition | ||||||
Raw milk yield (kg/d) | 2.95 | 3.71 | 0.176 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.36 |
3.5% FCM (kg/d) | 3.27 | 3.68 | 0.157 | 0.06 | <0.001 | 0.96 |
Milk yield (g/d) | ||||||
Fat | 123 | 128 | 6.6 | 0.55 | <0.001 | 0.93 |
Protein | 96 | 116 | 4.7 | 0.004 | 0.02 | 0.50 |
Lactose | 137 | 173 | 8.9 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.83 |
Milk content (g/kg) | ||||||
Fat | 41.9 | 34.9 | 2.07 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
Protein | 32.5 | 32.0 | 0.67 | 0.43 | 0.004 | 0.76 |
Lactose | 46.0 | 46.7 | 0.52 | 0.14 | <0.001 | 0.08 |
Milk fat:protein ratio | 1.28 | 1.09 | 0.048 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.08 |
Energy and protein calculated balance | ||||||
NEL intake (MJ/d) | 15.5 | 20.4 | 0.87 | <0.001 | 0.13 | 0.005 |
NEL balance (MJ/d) | −0.43 | 2.62 | 0.561 | <0.001 | 0.02 | 0.16 |
PDIE intake (g of PDI/d) | 272 | 350 | 13.7 | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
PDIE balance (g of PDI/d) | 85 | 119 | 8.2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.28 |

Rumen Fermentation Characteristics After Feeding
Item | Diet | SEM | P-value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L, Wk 4 | L, Wk 10 | H, Wk 4 | H, Wk 10 | C | W | C × W | T | C × T | ||
pH | 6.47 | 6.35 | 6.12 | 5.96 | 0.062 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.37 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Initial pH | 6.85 | 6.74 | 6.82 | 6.34 | 0.010 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | — | — |
Minimal pH | 6.18 | 6.08 | 5.62 | 5.65 | 0.012 | <0.001 | 0.59 | 0.29 | — | — |
Amplitude of pH decrease | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.22 | 0.62 | 0.013 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.002 | — | — |
Duration of pH <6.0 (min) | 18 | 35 | 182 | 178 | 4.3 | 0.004 | 0.76 | 0.61 | — | — |
Redox potential (mV) | −372 | −372 | −352 | −356 | 3.6 | 0.002 | 0.54 | 0.53 | <0.001 | 0.003 |
Osmotic pressure (mOsm/L) | 322 | 331 | 345 | 348 | 6.8 | 0.09 | 0.39 | 0.73 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
Soluble carbohydrates (g/L) | 1.65 | 1.55 | 2.50 | 2.37 | 0.165 | 0.02 | 0.52 | 0.93 | <0.001 | 0.02 |
Ammonia-N (mmol/L) | 8.12 | 9.95 | 4.62 | 5.31 | 0.795 | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.30 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
Total VFA (mmol/L) | 100 | 102 | 109 | 105 | 2.3 | 0.19 | 0.75 | 0.26 | <0.001 | 0.42 |
VFA (mol/100 mol) | ||||||||||
Acetate (A) | 67.7 | 68.5 | 63.6 | 63.3 | 0.94 | 0.005 | 0.71 | 0.42 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
Propionate (P) | 18.8 | 18.0 | 22.8 | 24.1 | 1.13 | 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.25 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
Butyrate | 10.6 | 10.6 | 11.5 | 10.9 | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.002 | 0.11 |
Isobutyrate | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.084 | 0.002 | 0.09 | 0.37 | <0.001 | 0.05 |
Valerate | 1.02 | 1.03 | 1.07 | 0.91 | 0.038 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.05 |
Isovalerate | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.063 | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.09 | <0.001 | 0.005 |
BCVFA | 1.62 | 1.60 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.146 | <0.001 | 0.12 | 0.19 | <0.001 | 0.03 |
A:P ratio | 3.66 | 3.87 | 2.82 | 2.86 | 0.179 | 0.002 | 0.23 | 0.41 | <0.001 | 0.37 |

In Sacco Ruminal Degradability and In Vivo Total-Tract Digestibility
Item 1 Data of DM and NDF disappearance were fitted with the nonlinear model proposed by Ørskov and McDonald (1979): Disappearance=a+b(1 – e–ct), where a is the soluble fraction (% of total DM or NDF), b the degradable fraction (% of total DM or NDF), t the time of rumen incubation (h), and c is the relative rate of degradation of fraction b (h−1). Effective degradabilities of DM or NDF were calculated with a particle outflow from the rumen of 0.06h−1. | Diet | SEM | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
L | H | Concentrate | ||
DM | ||||
Soluble: a | 19.0 | 23.7 | 0.86 | <0.001 |
Degradable: b | 51.2 | 46.0 | 1.03 | 0.002 |
Rate of degradation (%/h) | 0.065 | 0.045 | 0.0043 | <0.001 |
Effective degradability | 45.2 | 42.8 | 0.50 | 0.001 |
NDF | ||||
Soluble: a | 1.03 | 4.69 | 1.045 | 0.06 |
Degradable: b | 59.5 | 64.0 | 3.65 | 0.55 |
Rate of degradation (%/h) | 0.059 | 0.041 | 0.0056 | 0.08 |
Effective degradability | 30.5 | 27.0 | 0.70 | 0.003 |
Blood Composition Before and After Feeding
Item | Diet | SEM | P-value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L, Wk 4 | L, Wk 10 | H, Wk 4 | H, Wk 10 | C | W | C × W | T | C × T | ||
Glucose (mmol/L) | 3.23 | 3.25 | 3.42 | 3.32 | 0.045 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.55 |
Insulin (nmol/L) | 0.085 | 0.098 | 0.214 | 0.196 | 0.0349 | 0.09 | 0.77 | 0.07 | <0.001 | 0.06 |
NEFA (mmol/L) | 0.259 | 0.156 | 0.146 | 0.141 | 0.0125 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
BHBA (mmol/L) | 0.427 | 0.460 | 0.415 | 0.420 | 0.0246 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.61 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Urea (mmol of N/L) | 24.1 | 24.2 | 18.1 | 18.8 | 1.44 | 0.08 | 0.59 | 0.65 | <0.001 | 0.55 |
l-Lactate (mmol/L) | 0.344 | 0.440 | 0.452 | 0.515 | 0.0223 | 0.03 | <0.001 | 0.28 | <0.001 | 0.09 |
Osmotic pressure (mOsm/L) | 300 | 301 | 300 | 302 | 0.7 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 0.32 | <0.001 | 0.27 |
Animal Performance and Milk Composition
Item | Diet | SEM | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
L | H | Concentrate | ||
C4:0 | 1.82 | 1.74 | 0.043 | 0.34 |
C6:0 | 2.38 | 2.50 | 0.060 | 0.29 |
C8:0 | 2.88 | 3.22 | 0.094 | 0.01 |
C10:0 | 9.68 | 11.30 | 0.350 | 0.003 |
C11:0 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.017 | 0.10 |
C12:0 | 3.70 | 4.88 | 0.205 | <0.001 |
C13:0 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.011 | 0.02 |
C14:0 | 8.97 | 10.59 | 0.257 | <0.001 |
iso-C14:0 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.007 | 0.99 |
cis-9 C14:1 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.006 | 0.24 |
C15:0 | 1.01 | 1.04 | 0.030 | 0.57 |
iso-C15:0 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.010 | <0.001 |
anteiso-C15:0 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.012 | 0.17 |
C16:0 | 27.95 | 23.79 | 0.754 | <0.001 |
iso-C16:0 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.007 | 0.03 |
cis-9 C16:1 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.027 | 0.05 |
C17:0 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.009 | 0.78 |
iso-C17:0 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.047 | 0.65 |
anteiso-C17:0 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.007 | 0.58 |
C18:0 | 9.23 | 8.07 | 0.343 | 0.04 |
trans-6, trans-7, and trans-8 C18:1 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.023 | <0.001 |
trans-9 C18:1 | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.021 | <0.001 |
trans-10 C18:1 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.047 | <0.001 |
trans-11 C18:1 | 1.38 | 2.78 | 0.231 | <0.001 |
trans-12 C18:1 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 0.030 | <0.001 |
cis-6 and trans-13 and trans-14 C18:1 | 0.23 | 0.59 | 0.055 | 0.01 |
trans-15 C18:1 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.011 | 0.01 |
trans-16 C18:1 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.013 | 0.01 |
cis-9 C18:1 | 18.51 | 15.32 | 0.677 | 0.01 |
cis-11 C18:1 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.015 | 0.10 |
cis-12 C18:1 | 0.26 | 0.47 | 0.041 | 0.003 |
cis-13 C18:1 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.004 | 0.02 |
cis-9, cis-12 C18:2 | 2.81 | 3.35 | 0.116 | 0.004 |
cis-9, trans-12 C18:2 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.001 | 0.01 |
cis-9, trans-11 C18:2 | 0.65 | 1.28 | 0.112 | <0.001 |
trans-11, cis-15 C18:2 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.006 | 0.01 |
cis-9, cis-12, cis-15 C18:3 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.021 | 0.10 |
C20:0 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.008 | 0.003 |
C20:4 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.004 | 0.16 |
Unidentified fatty acids | 1.18 | 1.28 | 0.085 | 0.16 |
Saturated fatty acids | 70.61 | 69.76 | 0.673 | 0.46 |
Sum of trans C18:1 + cis-6 C18:1 | 3.43 | 5.96 | 0.420 | <0.001 |
Monounsaturated fatty acids | 23.33 | 22.78 | 0.513 | 0.56 |
Polyunsaturated fatty acids | 4.82 | 6.03 | 0.194 | 0.001 |
cis-9 C14:1/C14:0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.54 |
cis-9 C16:1/C16:0 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.58 |
cis-9 C18:1/C18:0 | 2.05 | 1.92 | 0.091 | 0.37 |
cis-9, trans-11 C18:2/trans-11 C18:1 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.013 | 0.72 |
Discussion
Intake, Ruminal Measurements, Nutrient Digestibility, and Plasma Metabolites
DMI and Physical Measurements of Rumen
Rumen VFA and Consequences on Metabolism
Ruminal Nitrogen and Metabolism
In Sacco Degradability and In Vivo Digestibility
Plasma NEFA and Energy Balance
Milk Production and Milk Composition
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Influence of forage:concentrate ratio and type of starch in the diet on feeding behaviour, dietary preferences, digestion, metabolism and performance of dairy goats in mid lactation.Anim. Sci. 2000; 71: 359-368
- Diet effect on the daily feeding behaviour, frequency and characteristics of meals in dairy goats.Livest. Prod. Sci. 2000; 64: 29-37
AFNOR. 1997. V18–121. Aliments des animaux. Détermination enzymatique de la teneur totale en amidon. Association française de normalisation (AFNOR), La Plaine Saint-Denis, France.
- Biosynthesis of amino acids by ruminal microorganisms.J. Anim. Sci. 1969; 29: 797-807
- Influence of percentage of concentrate in combination with rolled canola seeds on performance, rumen fermentation and milk fatty acid composition in dairy goats.Livest. Sci. 2006; 104: 77-90
- Effects of the nature of roughage and concentrate and their proportion on ruminal characteristics of non lactating goats, consequences on digestive interactions.Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996; 58: 267-282
- Quantitative review of ruminal and total tract digestion of mixed diet organic matter and carbohydrates.Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1997; 37: 173-189
- Micro-dosage automatisé sans déprotéinisation du β-hydroxybutyrate plasmatique chez les bovins.Ann. Rech. Vet. 1986; 17: 129-139
- Cinétique d’ingestion lors du grand repas chez le mouton: Influence du temps d’accès au foin et de son ingestibilité.Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1988; 28: 183-184
Baumont, R., J. P. Dulphy, D. Sauvant, G. Tran, F. Meschy, J. L. Peyraud, and P. Champciaux. 2007. Les tables de la valeur des aliments. Pages 181–286 in Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Besoins des animaux–Valeurs des Aliments. Tables INRA 2007. Ed. Quae, Versailles, France.
- Pathology, etiology, prevention, and treatment of fatty liver in dairy cows.J. Dairy Sci. 2004; 87: 3105-3124
- Ultra-microsinger determination using 2.9 dimethyl. 1. 10 phenanthroline hydrochloryde (neocuproine).Diabetes. 1961; 10: 60-62
- Composition of goat's milk: Changes within milking and effects of a high concentrate diet.J. Dairy Sci. 1984; 67: 1905-1911
- The effects of hay maturity and forage to concentrate ratio on digestion kinetics in goats.Small Rumin. Res. 1999; 32: 51-60
- Addition de lipides protégés (encapsulés ou savons de calcium) à la ration de vaches laitières. Effets sur les performances et la composition du lait.INRA. Prod. Anim. 1993; 6: 139-150
- Dietary lipids and forages interactions on cow and goat milk fatty acid composition and sensory properties.Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2004; 44: 467-492
- Effect of concentrate percentage on ruminal pH and time-budget in dairy goats.Animal. 2008; 2: 1802-1808
- Modeling of off-feed periods caused by subacute acidosis in intensive lactating ruminants: Application to goats.J. Dairy Sci. 2009; 92: 3894-3906
- Modélisation des épisodes d’acidose sub-clinique et du comportement alimentaire associé: application à la chèvre laitière.Renc. Rech. Rumin. 2008; 15: 339-343
- Meta-analysis of 0 to 8 h post-prandial evolution of ruminal pH.Animal. 2008; 2: 1437-1448
- Relations between plasma non-esterified fatty acid metabolism and body tissue mobilization during chronic undernutrition in goats.Br. J. Nutr. 1988; 60: 633-644
FAO. 2010. FAOSTAT. Accessed April 14, 2010. http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/DesktopDefault.aspx.
- Etude de l’influence préalable de différents traitements amylolytiques sur la teneur en résidu NDF d’aliments du bétail.Ann. Zootech. 1987; 36: 39-48
- Digestion of fatty acids in ruminants: A meta-analysis of flows and variation factors: 2. C18 fatty acids.Animal. 2008; 2: 691-704
- Lipid metabolism in the rumen.in: Hobson P.N. Stewart C.S. The rumen microbial ecosystem. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK1997: 382-426
- A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 2. The effects of feeding level and diet composition on digestibility.J. Dairy Sci. 2009; 92: 5031-5042
ISO. 1978. ISO 5984. Animal Feedingstuffs. Determination of Crude Ash. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Adaptation to changes in dietary composition, level and frequency of feeding.in: Ruckebusch Y. Thivend P. Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants. MTP Press Ltd., Lancaster, UK1980: 587-602
- Influence of forage-to-concentrate ratios on intake, digestibility, chewing and milk production of dairy goats.Small Rumin. Res. 1991; 4: 11-18
- Influence of carbohydrate source and buffer on rumen fermentation characteristics, milk yield, and milk composition in late-lactation Holstein cows.J. Dairy Sci. 2001; 84: 1707-1716
- Quantification of whole blood short-chain fatty acids by gas chromatographic determination of plasma 2-chloroethyl derivatives and correction for dilution space in erythrocytes.Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2000; 50: 231-236
- The effects of forage proportion and rapidly degradable dry matter from concentrate on ruminal digestion in dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets with fixed neutral detergent fiber and starch contents.J. Dairy Sci. 2010; 93: 666-681
- Occurrence of trans-C18:1 fatty acid isomers in goat milk: Effect of two dietary regimens.J. Dairy Sci. 2002; 85: 190-197
- Implication of feeding isoenergetic diets containing animal fat on milk composition of alpine does during early lactation.J. Dairy Sci. 1993; 76: 1137-1147
- Propionate for fatty acid synthesis by the mammary gland of the lactating goat.J. Dairy Sci. 1983; 66: 1445-1454
- Influence of farming and feeding systems on composition and quality of goat and sheep milk.Small Rumin. Res. 2007; 68: 20-34
- A meta-analysis of feed digestion in dairy cows. 1. The effects of forage and concentrate factors on total diet digestibility.J. Dairy Sci. 2009; 92: 5019-5030
- The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.). 1979; 92: 499-503
- Energy utilization of diets with different hay proportions in lactating goats.Zootec. Nutr. Anim. 1997; 23: 317-328
- Dietary fiber and milk yield, mastication, digestion, and rate of passage in goats fed alfalfa hay.J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 209-219
SAS Institute. 2000. User's Guide. Release 11.04. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Sauvant, D., S. Giger-Reverdin, and F. Meschy. 2007. Alimentation des caprins. Pages 137–148 in Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. Besoins des animaux–Valeurs des Aliments. Tables INRA 2007. Ed. Quae, Versailles, France.
- Taux Butyreux et composition de la matière grasse du lait chez les petits ruminants: Effets de l’apport de matières grasses ou d’aliments concentrés.INRA. Prod. Anim. 2001; 14: 333-352
- Role of trans fatty acids in the nutritional regulation of mammary lipogenesis in ruminants.Animal. 2010; 4: 1140-1166
- Comparison of Leco FP-228 ‘nitrogen determinator’ with AOAC copper catalyst Kjeldahl method for crude protein.J. AOAC Int. 1987; 70: 1028-1030
- Varying amount of rumen-inert fat for high producing goats in early lactation.J. Dairy Sci. 1994; 77: 253-258
- Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents.J. AOAC. 1967; 50: 50-55
- Révision du système des Protéines Digestibles dans l’Intestin (PDI).Bull. Tech. CRZV Theix. 1987; 70: 19-34
- Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review.Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006; 131: 389-417
- Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia.Anal. Chem. 1967; 38: 971-977
Article info
Publication history
Identification
Copyright
User license
Elsevier user license |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
Not Permitted
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy