Advertisement
Research| Volume 100, ISSUE 8, P6100-6110, August 2017

Download started.

Ok

Rapid consumer-based sensory characterization of requeijão cremoso, a spreadable processed cheese: Performance of new statistical approaches to evaluate check-all-that-apply data

Open ArchivePublished:May 29, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12516

      ABSTRACT

      We investigated the performance of multidimensional alignment analysis and multidimensional scaling on phi coefficient values to evaluate check-all-that-apply questionnaire data. We evaluated 6 dairy foods belonging to the category of requeijão cremoso processed cheese (traditional, with starch, or with starch and vegetable fat). We obtained sensory descriptors using trained assessors in descriptive analysis for comparison. A check-all-that-apply questionnaire used with 121 consumers (77 women and 44 men; 18 to 57 yr old) proved to be a suitable alternative for sensory profiling, providing descriptions similar to descriptive analysis and discriminating between products. Multidimensional alignment analysis and multidimensional scaling were efficient and logical approaches for obtaining a deeper understanding of the data, allowing us to clarify the relationships between sensory descriptors and products and contribute to optimizing the different formulations of requeijão cremoso.

      Key words

      INTRODUCTION

      Sensory perception is one of the keys to the flavorful and wholesome image that dairy foods continue to enjoy with consumers. In some cases, gross measurement of product quality or consistency may be all that is required, but for most products and market research, more detailed and complex information about sensory properties is needed (
      • Drake M.A.
      Sensory analysis of dairy foods.
      ).
      Descriptive tests provide sensory descriptors of the product, allowing for comparisons between products (
      • Stone H.
      • Bleibaum R.N.
      • Thomas H.A.
      ). Outlining the sensory characteristics of products is a common practice in the dairy industry, contributing to business decisions and the development of products according to consumer needs; developing reference products; and investigating the effects of ingredients or processes and sensory changes during storage (
      • Varela P.
      • Ares G.
      Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization.
      ).
      Descriptive analysis is a recognized and established method used by the dairy industry. It employs a trained panel to identify and quantify the intensity of each sensory descriptor, providing a complete sensory profile (
      • Drake M.A.
      Sensory analysis of dairy foods.
      ). Several studies on the descriptive analysis (DA) of dairy products have been published (
      • Cadena R.S.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: Sensory profiling and external preference mapping.
      ;
      • Albenzio M.
      • Santillo A.
      • Caroprese M.
      • Braghieri A.
      • Sevi A.
      • Napolitano F.
      Composition and sensory profiling of probiotic Scamorza ewe milk cheese.
      ;
      • Murtaza M.A.
      • Rehman S.U.
      • Anjum F.M.
      • Huma N.
      Descriptive sensory profile of cow and buffalo milk Cheddar cheese prepared using indigenous cultures.
      ;
      • Pimentel T.C.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Prudencio S.H.
      Influence of long-chain inulin and Lactobacillus paracasei subspecies paracasei on the sensory profile and acceptance of a traditional yogurt.
      ;
      • Aquino L.F.M.C.
      • Silva A.C.O.
      • Freitas M.Q.
      • Felicio T.L.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Conte-Junior C.A.
      Identifying cheese whey an adulterant in milk: Limited contribution of a sensometric approach.
      ;
      • Gaze L.V.
      • Oliveira B.R.
      • Ferrao L.L.
      • Granato D.
      • Cavalcanti R.N.
      • Conte Junior C.A.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Freitas M.Q.
      Preference mapping of Dulce de leche commercialized in Brazilian markets.
      ;
      • Janiaski D.R.
      • Pimentel T.C.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Prudencio S.H.
      Strawberry-flavored yogurts and whey beverages: What is the sensory profile of the ideal product?.
      ;
      • Kwab H.S.
      • Meullenet J.-F.
      • Lee Y.
      Sensory profile, consumer acceptance and driving sensory attributes for commercial vanilla ice creams marketed in the United States.
      ). However, DA requires a considerable amount of time, because a series of training sessions is necessary to ensure reliable results. Faster and more flexible sensory methodologies using consumers are needed (
      • Valentin D.
      • Chollet S.
      • Lelievre M.
      • Abdi H.
      Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science.
      ).
      Of the descriptive sensory methods that use consumers, the check-all-that-apply (CATA) questionnaire has been evaluated by several studies (
      • Ares G.
      • Barreiro C.
      • Deliza R.
      • Giménez A.
      • Gámbarro A.
      Application of a check-all-that-apply question to the development of chocolate milk desserts.
      ;
      • Dooley L.
      • Lee Y.
      • Meullenet J.
      The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping.
      ;
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Cadena R.S.
      • Alvaro M.B.V.B.
      • Sant'Ana A.S.
      • Oliveira C.A.F.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      • Ferreira M.M.C.
      Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts.
      ;
      • Varela P.
      • Tárrega A.
      • Salvador A.
      • Leal A.A.
      • Flanagan J.
      • Roller M.
      • Feuilere N.
      • Issaly N.
      • Fiszman S.
      Diabetic and non-diabetic consumers' perception of an apple juice beverage supplemented with a Fraxinus excelsior L. seed extract having potential glucose homeostasis benefits.
      ;
      • Santos B.A.
      • Campagnol P.C.B.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Galvão M.T.E.L.
      • Monteiro R.A.
      • Wagner R.
      • Pollonio M.A.R.
      Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: Comparison with trained panel.
      ;
      • Antunes L.
      • Vidal L.
      • Saldamando L.
      • Gimenez A.
      • Ares G.
      Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization: Case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks.
      ). The CATA questions consist of a list of attributes (words or phrases) from which assessors can select those they consider appropriate for describing a product (
      • Ares G.
      • Jaeger S.R.
      Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization.
      ). However, when the samples to be evaluated are very similar, or if they are complex from a sensory point of view, traditional statistical methods such as Cochran's Q test and correspondence analysis may not be suitable for assessing the many the differences or correlations between products (
      • Ares G.
      • Tárrega A.
      • Izquierdo L.
      • Jaeger S.R.
      Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions.
      ); new approaches that improve the interpretation of results are needed. Multidimensional alignment and multidimensional scaling are options for the interpretation of CATA findings. Multidimensional alignment is a numerical tool that allows researchers to identify associations between samples and attributes by measuring the cosine angles between them (
      • Carr B.T.
      • Dzuroska J.
      • Taylor R.O.
      • Lanza K.
      • Pansini C.
      ). Multidimensional scaling can be used with phi coefficient values to determine which attributes are usually checked together and which are chosen independently, measuring the distance to specific locations in a special configuration (
      • Jaworska N.
      • Chupetlovska-Anastasova A.
      A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains.
      ).
      Requeijão cremoso is a typical Brazilian processed cheese manufactured using a variety of ingredients and technologies (
      • Oliveira R.B.A.
      • Margalho L.P.
      • Nascimento J.S.
      • Costa L.E.O.
      • Portela J.B.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Sant'Ana A.S.
      Processed cheese contamination by spore-forming bacteria: A review of sources, routes, fate during processing and control.
      ). It is a typical dairy food manufactured by most Brazilian dairy enterprises regardless of their size, and recently, products similar to traditional requeijão cremoso have been developed that contain starch or vegetable fat or both. Given these differences, we wanted to obtain a deep understanding of the characteristics of the different cheeses, and to suggest improvements from a sensory perspective.
      This study had 2 purposes: (1) to investigate the performance of a CATA questionnaire to provide a sensory profile of different requeijão cremoso products (requeijão containing starch; starch and vegetable oil; and a traditional formulation without these ingredients); and (2) to evaluate the use of multidimensional alignment and multidimensional scaling on phi coefficient values as a way of obtaining a deeper, complementary interpretation of the findings, which could be useful for the dairy industry. For comparison, we also performed DA using a trained panel.

      MATERIALS AND METHODS

      Samples

      We used a convenience sample for this study (
      • Felicio T.L.
      • Esmerino E.A.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Nogueira L.C.
      • Raices R.S.L.
      • Deliza R.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      • Pollonio M.A.R.
      Cheese. What is its contribution to the sodium intake of Brazilians?.
      ). We acquired 6 samples from supermarkets in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and kept them in the refrigerator at 9°C (±1°C) until analysis. The samples were traditional requeijão cremoso (1 sample), requeijão cremoso containing starch (3 samples), and requeijão cremoso containing starch and vegetable fat (2 samples), and were numbered I, II, III, IV, V, and VI, respectively. We used the traditional requeijão cremoso as a reference. We used only samples submitted to federal sanitary inspection that could be marketed throughout Brazil. For all sensory analyses, samples were presented in white 50-mL plastic cups identified with 3-digit numbers at a temperature of approximately 5°C.

      Descriptive Analysis

      Descriptive analysis (DA) was performed in the Sensory Analysis Laboratory of the Federal Fluminense University, according to the principles described by
      • Stone H.
      • Bleibaum R.N.
      • Thomas H.A.
      . The assessors defined attributes of appearance, aroma, flavor, and texture that characterized the samples, and standards to anchor the ends of the perceived intensity scale shown in Table 1. The sensory descriptors were divided into 5 groups: appearance (color, brightness), aroma (artificial requeijão cremoso aroma, natural requeijão cremoso aroma, buttery aroma, sweet aroma, acid aroma), flavor (sweet taste, bitter taste, acid taste, salty taste, buttery flavor, artificial requeijão cremoso flavor, natural requeijão cremoso flavor, oil film), visual texture (consistency, adhesiveness, spreadability, gelatinous quality, homogeneity, forming wire) and oral texture (consistency, adhesiveness).
      Table 1Attributes used for descriptive analysis of requeijão cremoso samples: definitions and references
      AttributeDefinitionReference
      Itambe (Uberlandia, MG, Brazil), Mane (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil), Elegê (BRF Brasil, Sao Goncalo, RJ, Brazil), Ninho Nestlé (Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil), Paulista (Danone, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil), Poços de Caldas (Poços de Caldas, MG, Brazil), Polenghi (Goiatuba, GO, Brazil), Philadelphia (Kraft Foods, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil), Puranata (Alto da Boa Vista Frutal, MG, Brazil), Leite Moça (Nestlé, Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil), Royal (Mondelez International, Bauru, SP, Brazil), Turma da Mônica (Geleia Homemade, Itupeva, SP, Brazil).
      Artificial requeijão cremoso aromaAroma associated with Parmesan cheeseNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: cheese essence, Mane, prepared in the proportion of 12 g of essence to 40 mL of water
      Buttery aromaAroma associated with unsalted butterLow: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: unsalted butter, Elegê
      Sweet aromaTypical carbohydrate aroma (e.g., sucrose, glucose, lactose)None: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: 5 g of Ninho milk powder diluted in 10 mL of Itambé UHT whole milk
      Acid aromaTypical aroma related to the formation of fatty acids by hydrolysis of triglyceridesNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: natural yogurt, Paulista
      Natural requeijão cremoso aromaMilk aroma with mild salty perceptionLow: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      High: creamy requeijão cremoso, Poços de Caldas
      Sweet tasteTaste perceived by stimulus sugars sucrose, glucose, and lactoseNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: 5 g of milk powder, Ninho, diluted in 10 mL of UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Bitter tasteTaste perceived by stimulating alkaloid chemical compoundsNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: cream cheese, Polenghi
      Acid tasteTaste perceived by stimulus ions released by organic acidsNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: cream cheese, Philadelphia
      Salty tasteTaste perceived by soluble salts such as sodium chlorideLow: 0.1 g of Na Cl + 40 mL of water solution
      High: 0.4 g of Na Cl + 40 mL of water solution
      Buttery flavorFlavor associated with unsalted butterLow: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: unsalted butter, Elegê
      Artificial requeijão cremoso flavorFlavor caused by the substance that gives cheese flavor to foodNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: requeijão sabor 4 queijos, Puranata
      Natural requeijão cremoso flavorTaste associated with dairy product, combined with light perception of salty and acid tastesLow: cream cheese, Polenghi
      High: creamy requeijão cremoso, Poços de Caldas
      Oil filmFatty sensation in the oral mucosa and lipsNone: UHT whole milk, Itambé
      Strong: unsalted butter, Elegê
      Oral adhesivenessAdherence to the palate when pressed against the roof of the mouth by the tongueLow: UHT cream, Nestlé
      High: UHT cream, Polenghi
      Oral consistencySpeed at which the sample melts in the mouth; faster = less consistentNone: UHT cream, Nestlé
      High: UHT processed cheese, Polenghi
      ColorRequeijão characteristic generated from the light reflectance of the resulting product and stainingWhite: natural yogurt, Paulista
      Yellow: sweetened condensed milk, Leite Moça
      BrightnessIntensity of light reflectionLow: cream cheese, Polenghi
      High: sweetened condensed milk, Leite Moça
      ConsistencyBy dividing the product in half with a trowel and speed with which the parties reuniteLow: sweetened condensed milk, Leite Moça
      High: cream cheese, Polenghi
      AdhesivenessPower joining the spoon when lying on the surface of the product, using only its own weight, and manually raised at an angle of 90°Low: sweetened condensed milk, Leite Moça
      High: pastry Dulce de leche, Elegê
      Gelatinous qualityFeature that the product has when its consistency resembles gelatinNone: UHT cream, Nestlé
      High: Royal Vanilla flan prepared according to manufacturer's instructions
      HomogeneityFeature that the product has when its composition or its appearance is completely equalLow: Strawberry jam, Turma da Mônica
      High: UHT cream, Nestlé
      Forming wireProduct features to form long strands to be handled with the spatulaNone: natural yogurt, Paulista
      High: sweetened condensed milk, Leite Moça
      SpreadabilityThe ease with which the product at 10°C is spread on toast with spatulaLow: strawberry jam, Turma da Mônica
      High: UHT cream, Nestlé
      1 Itambe (Uberlandia, MG, Brazil), Mane (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil), Elegê (BRF Brasil, Sao Goncalo, RJ, Brazil), Ninho Nestlé (Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil), Paulista (Danone, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil), Poços de Caldas (Poços de Caldas, MG, Brazil), Polenghi (Goiatuba, GO, Brazil), Philadelphia (Kraft Foods, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil), Puranata (Alto da Boa Vista Frutal, MG, Brazil), Leite Moça (Nestlé, Ituiutaba, MG, Brazil), Royal (Mondelez International, Bauru, SP, Brazil), Turma da Mônica (Geleia Homemade, Itupeva, SP, Brazil).
      To memorize the anchors, assessors went through 18 sessions, totaling 27 h of training. After training, assessors were asked to evaluate 3 samples in 4 replicates, using the definitive sheet for DA. All attributes were evaluated using an unstructured 15-cm line scale, anchored at the extremes by “none/weak” and “very strong” (
      • McMahon K.M.
      • Castura J.
      • Culver C.
      • Ross C.F.
      Perception of carbonation in sparkling wines using descriptive analysis (DA) and temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
      ). The results were evaluated by 2-way ANOVA and assessors who had discriminatory capacity (pFsample ≤0.50) and good repeatability of the results (pFreplicate ≥0.05) for all attributes were selected for the final stage (
      • Cadena R.S.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Rolim Netto R.
      • Castro W.F.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time.
      ). The final evaluation was performed in 4 replicates, with 11 selected assessors in sensory booths. All samples were presented in monadic and balanced form, according to the methodology described by
      • Macfie H.
      • Bratchell J.N.
      • Greenhoff K.
      • Vallis L.V.
      Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests.
      .

      CATA

      A CATA questionnaire was completed by 121 consumers (77 women and 44 men, aged 18 to 57 yr) who were randomly recruited at the Veterinary School of Federal Fluminense University. Prior to testing, each participant signed a consent form. Consumers who were allergic to milk or lactose intolerant and consumers who consumed dairy products <1 time/week were excluded. Mineral water and unsalted crackers were used to cleanse the palate.
      The selection of attributes for the CATA questionnaire was based on the list from the DA, removing terms that showed low mean values or no significant difference. A similar approach has been used in recent studies evaluating dairy foods such as yogurts (
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Cadena R.S.
      • Alvaro M.B.V.B.
      • Sant'Ana A.S.
      • Oliveira C.A.F.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      • Ferreira M.M.C.
      Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts.
      ;
      • Tarrega A.
      • Marcano J.
      • Fiszman S.
      Yogurt viscosity and fruit pieces affect satiating capacity expectations.
      ), dairy desserts (
      • Bruzzone F.
      • Vidal L.
      • Antunez L.
      • Gimenez A.
      • Deliza R.
      • Ares G.
      Comparison of intensity scales and CATA questions in new product development: Sensory characterization and directions for product reformulation of milk desserts.
      ), and ice creams (
      • Dooley L.
      • Lee Y.
      • Meullenet J.
      The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping.
      ). Based on these criteria, buttery aroma, sweet aroma, and acid aroma were removed. Color and homogeneity attributes were adapted from the scale used in the DA. In the DA, color ranged from white to yellow, so we evaluated “yellowness” and “whiteness” in the CATA. In the DA, the score for homogeneity varied from low to high, so for the CATA, we revised these extremes to be “homogeneous” and “heterogeneous.” Furthermore, other attributes were revised to be more easily understood by consumers: fatty (oil film), ease of melting in the mouth (oral consistency), viscosity (form wire), and creaminess (consistency).
      Consumers were asked to select how many terms they considered appropriate to describe the samples. The position of the terms in the questionnaire was adapted according to recommended procedures from
      • Ares G.
      • Jaeger S.R.
      Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization.
      , who found that consumers had an easier time with a CATA questionnaire when terms were grouped (i.e., odor, taste, appearance). Therefore, descriptors were assembled into 3 major groups: appearance (brightness, yellowness, whiteness, homogeneity, gelatinous quality, heterogeneity, viscosity, creaminess, and spreadability), natural and artificial requeijão cremoso aroma, and oral perception (sweet taste, salty taste, acid taste, bitter taste, natural and artificial requeijão cremoso flavor, buttery flavor, oil film, and ease of melting in the mouth). Then, groups were arranged on the page so that each group occupied all positions the same number of times. Words within attribute groups always appeared in a fixed order. Thus, we obtained 6 different page models.

      Statistical Analysis

      We analyzed findings from the DA using 2-way ANOVA (samples and assessors and their interaction as sources of variation), followed by Tukey's test for comparison between means (P < 0.05) to check for significant differences between samples for each attribute (
      • Gaze L.V.
      • Oliveira B.R.
      • Ferrao L.L.
      • Granato D.
      • Cavalcanti R.N.
      • Conte Junior C.A.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Freitas M.Q.
      Preference mapping of Dulce de leche commercialized in Brazilian markets.
      ). We also applied principal component analysis to the mean values for sensory attribute intensity using correlation data (
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Cadena R.S.
      • Alvaro M.B.V.B.
      • Sant'Ana A.S.
      • Oliveira C.A.F.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      • Ferreira M.M.C.
      Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts.
      ). For the CATA findings, we applied Cochran's Q test to each sensory descriptor to evaluate possible differences between treatments (samples) with binary responses. We calculated correspondence analysis using chi-squared distances on the frequency of each sample and attribute, obtaining a contingency table with orthogonal components and maximizing the sequential representation of variation of data (
      • Vidal L.
      • Tárrega A.
      • Antúnez L.
      • Ares G.
      • Jaeger S.R.
      Comparison of correspondence analysis based on Hellinger and chi-squared distances to obtain sensory spaces from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions.
      ).
      We tested multidimensional alignment (MDA) and multidimensional scaling (MDS) based on phi coefficient values (
      • Meyners M.
      • Castura J.C.
      • Carr T.
      Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data.
      ), new approaches recently suggested for evaluating CATA findings. We used MDA to evaluate the association of the sensory descriptors with each sample. By calculating the cosine of the angle formed between each attribute and sample (range −1 to 1), it is possible to determine which attributes have a strong relationship with each sample and obtain complete information about the relationship between products and attributes. Absolute cosines below 0.707 [= cos (45°) = −cos (135°)] indicate very little relationship (
      • Carr B.T.
      • Dzuroska J.
      • Taylor R.O.
      • Lanza K.
      • Pansini C.
      ). We used the phi coefficient to check the correlation between attributes. When applied to all assessors, it allows us to determine which attributes typically appear together and which are used independently. The phi coefficients between pairs of attributes enabled us to construct a matrix of similarities that we submitted to metric MDS. The degree of correspondence among the distances between points implied by the MDS map and the matrix input by the user is measured (inversely) by a stress function. When the MDS map perfectly reproduces the input data, the stress is zero. Thus, the smaller the stress, the better the representation (
      • Granato D.
      • Ares G.
      ).
      Finally, we used multiple factor analysis to compare both sensory configurations (samples and sensory descriptors) described by each methodology, assessing the sensory positioning of products in a single map. A 6-row matrix, in which each row corresponded to each sample data, was constructed with 2 blocks of columns, corresponding to the positions of the samples at the 2 first dimensions of each methodology. The similarity/correlation RV coefficient was used as a quantitative measure of this correspondence (
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Cadena R.S.
      • Alvaro M.B.V.B.
      • Sant'Ana A.S.
      • Oliveira C.A.F.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      • Ferreira M.M.C.
      Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts.
      ;
      • Santos B.A.
      • Pollonio M.A.R.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Messias V.C.
      • Monteiro R.A.
      • Oliveira T.L.C.
      • Faria J.A.F.
      • Freitas M.Q.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      Ultra-flash profile and projective mapping for describing sensory attributes of prebiotic mortadelas.
      ;
      • Pontual I.
      • Amaral G.V.
      • Esmerino E.A.
      • Pimentel T.C.
      • Freitas M.Q.
      • Fukuda R.K.
      • Sant'Ana I.L.
      • Silva L.G.
      • Cruz A.G.
      Assessing consumer expectations about pizza: A study on celiac and non-celiac individuals using the word association technique.
      ).

      RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      Descriptive Analysis

      The DA resulted in 23 sensory descriptors, more than the number obtained in a previous study (
      • Garruti D.S.
      • Brito E.S.
      • Brandão T.M.
      • Uchôa Jr., P.
      • Silva M.A.P.P.
      Desenvolvimento do perfil sensorial e aceitação de requeijão cremoso.
      ), and demonstrating the sensory complexity of the samples. Table 2 shows the results of the DA test. We observed significant differences for most attributes, indicating a wide variety of sensory characteristics for this group of products and providing evidence for the different procedures and formulations used by dairy companies to make requeijão cremoso. Sample I (traditional requeijão cremoso) was characterized by increased brightness and wire formation, more intense white color, and high homogeneity. Samples II and III exhibited similar profiles, with intermediate brightness, greater tendency to yellow, and a flavor similar to that of traditional requeijão cremoso. Sample III also had the highest sweetness and lower saltiness intensities. Sample IV had high saltiness intensity, lower brightness, and a strong buttery flavor. Sample V was different from the other samples with respect to the following attributes: gelatinous quality, homogeneity, spreadability and wire formation, artificial requeijão cremoso aroma and artificial requeijão cremoso flavor, sweet aroma, and consistency in the mouth. Finally, sample VI showed a tendency to white and increased consistency, adhesiveness, homogeneity, and oral adhesiveness. We observed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the samples for the following attributes: buttery aroma, acid taste, and oil film.
      Table 2Attribute mean values for each sample of requeijão cremoso in the descriptive analysis using a 15-cm nonstructured intensity scale
      AttributeRequeijão cremoso sample
      I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat.
      IIIIIIIVVVI
      Brightness13.28
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.69
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.76
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.76
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.65
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.79
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Color3.25
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.94
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.14
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.06
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.88
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.79
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Consistency6.97
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.69
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.78
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      12.49
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      12.29
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      13.10
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Adhesiveness8.50
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.06
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.74
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      13.36
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.04
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      13.07
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Gelatinous quality0.11
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.24
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.18
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.22
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      13.00
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.26
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Homogeneity14.03
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      13.02
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      12.98
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      12.91
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.71
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      13.71
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Forming wire9.03
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.08
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.63
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.96
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.17
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.76
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Spreadability10.76
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      14.21
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      11.45
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.81
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.84
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.31
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Artificial requeijão cremoso aroma1.10
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.61
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1.4
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1.25
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      12.32
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1.49
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Buttery aroma5.91
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.17
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.05
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      7.24
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.41
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.58
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Sweet aroma3.40
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.21
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.12
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.49
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.73
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.18
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Acid aroma1.82
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.41
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.10
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1.77
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.45
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.22
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Natural requeijão cremoso aroma7.76
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.41
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.37
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      7.69
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.92
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.88
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Buttery flavor7.20
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      7.23
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.55
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.03
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.61
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.17
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Artificial requeijão cremoso flavor0.92
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.66
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1.20
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1.27
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      11.77
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.833
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Natural requeijão cremoso flavor6.02
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      7.84
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.64
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.86
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      2.69
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.48
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Salty taste9.80
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.97
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      7.06
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      11.28
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.19
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.21
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Sweet taste1.23
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.89
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.74
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.86
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.44
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      0.66
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Bitter taste3.85
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.91
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.77
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.83
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.68
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.98
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Acid taste4.23
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.95
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.51
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.49
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      3.04
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.88
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Oral adhesiveness8.15
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.81
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.37
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.03
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.87
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      10.94
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Oral consistency6.67
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.99
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.51
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      8.19
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.51
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      9.43
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      Oil film5.11
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.84
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.07
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      5.94
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      6.67
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      4.60
      Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      a–e Means with different superscript letters in the same column differed (P < 0.05).
      1 I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat.
      Principal component analysis explained approximately 76% of the variation when considering the 2 first dimensions (Figure 1). The first dimension was responsible for approximately 50% of the variation, characterized by natural requeijão cremoso aroma, homogeneity, and natural requeijão cremoso flavor. The second dimension was responsible for approximately 26% of the variation, characterized by adhesiveness, buttery flavor, buttery aroma, and bitter taste. Samples I, II, and III were characterized by natural requeijão cremoso aroma and flavor, sweet taste, sweet aroma, forming wire, brightness, homogeneity, and spreadability. Samples IV and VI were characterized by adhesiveness, buttery flavor, buttery aroma, and bitter taste. Sample V was characterized by artificial requeijão cremoso aroma and flavor, oil film, color, and gelatinous quality.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Principal component analysis of requeijão cremoso samples using descriptive analysis. I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat. F = factor. Color version available online.
      We found no studies describing a DA of requeijão cremoso containing starch and vegetable in the literature, so we used traditional requeijão cremoso for comparison. The attributes used to describe the samples were similar to those reported by
      • Garruti D.S.
      • Brito E.S.
      • Brandão T.M.
      • Uchôa Jr., P.
      • Silva M.A.P.P.
      Desenvolvimento do perfil sensorial e aceitação de requeijão cremoso.
      , who studied 4 commercial samples of requeijão cremoso. When comparing those results with the ones obtained in the present study, we noted that forming wire, salty taste, consistency, adhesiveness, and yellow color were important characteristics of this type of processed cheese.

      CATA

      Cochran's Q test (Table 3) showed differences in all attributes among the samples, except for acid taste and viscosity, emphasizing the efficacy of consumer CATA questions in identifying sensory differences. The terms used in the CATA questionnaire were easy to understand, and some differences from the trained panel were due to intrinsic differences in the methods.
      Table 3Frequency mention of sensory attributes associated with each sample of requeijão cremoso by consumers (n = 121) on check-all-that-apply questions
      AttributeSample
      I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat.
      P-value
      P-value greater than α = 0.05 indicates no significant difference.
      IIIIIIIVVVI
      Sweet taste931429104<0.001
      Salty taste626335695660<0.001
      Acid taste1818191325120.125
      Bitter taste13138122390.017
      Natural requeijão cremoso flavor56233038658<0.001
      Artificial requeijão cremoso flavor284332336915<0.001
      Buttery flavor2236373323240.028
      Fatty2845363655340.001
      Easy melting on mouth545253642149<0.001
      Natural requeijão cremoso aroma46272933852<0.001
      Artificial requeijão cremoso aroma172719135611<0.001
      Brightness724144461960<0.001
      Yellow color109666411915<0.001
      White color81929537572<0.001
      Homogeneity907378723986<0.001
      Heterogeneity2636386<0.001
      Gelatinous quality35156010<0.001
      Viscosity3427242823250.508
      Creaminess616266641778<0.001
      Spreadability372844361123<0.001
      1 I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat.
      2 P-value greater than α = 0.05 indicates no significant difference.
      A correspondence analysis bidimensional map is shown in Figure 2. For correspondence analysis, we divided the samples into 3 groups: samples I, IV, and VI in the upper left quadrant; samples II and III in the lower left quadrant; and sample V in the upper right quadrant. Considering the frequency for each attribute, shown in Table 3, we were able to obtain a description of samples. Samples I and VI were in almost the same position and had the following properties: brightness, natural requeijão cremoso flavor, and natural requeijão cremoso aroma. These were also the attributes most likely to describe the samples. In the same quadrant, sample IV was homogeneous and creamy, and according to the attributes selected, it was also salty and melted easily in the mouth. Samples II and III had a yellow color, sweet taste, and buttery flavor. Finally, sample V was gelatinous, heterogeneous, and had an artificial requeijão cremoso aroma and flavor. Whiteness of requeijão cremoso was also frequently selected by consumers.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Correspondence analysis of requeijão cremoso samples using check-all-that-apply findings. I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat. F = factor. Color version available online.
      After developing the correspondence analysis map, we applied MDA to the coordinates of each sample and sensory descriptors. Table 4 shows the relationship between attributes and samples using MDA (cosine values >0.707 suggesting a strong relationship between samples and the attributes). Positive values indicate that the product is strongly characterized by the attribute, and negative values indicate that the product is not characterized by the attribute. Sample I was correlated with viscosity, homogeneity, brightness, and natural requeijão cremoso aroma/flavor (cosines 1.00, 0.74, 0.92, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively); it was not correlated with sweet taste, acid taste, artificial requeijão cremoso flavor, or fatty (−0.71, −0.78, −0.79, and −0.82, respectively). In contrast, samples II and III were characterized as yellow and had a buttery flavor and a sweet taste. The terms spreadability, creaminess, viscosity, homogeneity, brightness, natural requeijão cremoso aroma, easily melted in the mouth and natural requeijão cremoso flavor were the main attributes of sample IV. Sample V was correlated with gelatinous quality, fatty, heterogeneity, artificial requeijão cremoso aroma/flavor, bitter taste, and an acid taste. Sample VI was correlated with viscosity, homogeneity, brightness, and natural requeijão cremoso aroma/flavor. These findings could be interesting for dairy processors, because they can evaluate the attributes that were strongly related to the traditional sample, which did not contain starch and vegetable fat, and use it as a guideline for developing similar products. For example, sample VI, which does contains starch and vegetable fat, had a strong correlation with the same attributes (homogeneity, brightness, and natural requeijão aroma/flavor) as sample I.
      Table 4Cosine values between vector pairs (product vector vs. main sensory terms) in the characterization of samples obtained by multidimensional alignment for requeijão cremoso samples
      AttributeSample
      I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat.
      Bold values indicate correlation of the sensory attributes with the respective sample. Positive values indicate positive correlation, and negative values indicate negative correlation.
      IIIIIIIVVVI
      Sweet taste−0.711.000.92−0.06−0.26−0.73
      Salty taste0.54−0.98−0.98−0.150.460.57
      Acid taste−0.780.10−0.30−1.000.93−0.76
      Bitter taste−0.500.27−0.63−0.951.00−0.46
      Natural requeijão cremoso flavor0.96−0.48−0.090.90−0.720.95
      Artificial requeijão cremoso flavor−0.790.12−0.28−1.000.92−0.77
      Buttery flavor−0.661.000.940.01−0.33−0.68
      Fatty−0.820.17−0.23−0.990.90−0.80
      Easy melting on mouth0.470.300.650.94−1.000.43
      Natural requeijão cremoso aroma0.93−0.380.010.94−0.790.91
      Artificial requeijão cremoso aroma−0.70−0.02−0.41−1.000.97−0.67
      Brightness0.92−0.370.020.95−0.790.91
      Yellow color−0.701.000.92−0.05−0.27−0.72
      White color0.57−0.98−0.97−0.120.430.60
      Homogeneity0.74−0.040.351.00−0.950.72
      Heterogeneity−0.51−0.26−0.62−0.951.00−0.48
      Gelatinous quality−0.44−0.33−0.68−0.921.00−0.41
      Viscosity1.00−0.67−0.330.78−0.531.00
      Creaminess0.590.160.530.98−0.990.56
      Spreadability0.270.490.790.84−0.970.24
      1 I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat.
      2 Bold values indicate correlation of the sensory attributes with the respective sample. Positive values indicate positive correlation, and negative values indicate negative correlation.
      The clear and complete relationship between attributes and samples that can be assessed by MDA is not always available using the bidimensional map obtained by correspondence analysis (
      • Meyners M.
      • Castura J.C.
      • Carr T.
      Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data.
      ). For instance, sample V did not present a clear association with bitter taste, salty taste, and sour taste when assessed by correspondence analysis bidimensional map. Use of MDA to analyze CATA findings is advantageous and confirms recent observations from a study evaluating low-sodium dry fermented sausages (
      • Santos B.A.
      • Campagnol P.C.B.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Galvão M.T.E.L.
      • Monteiro R.A.
      • Wagner R.
      • Pollonio M.A.R.
      Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: Comparison with trained panel.
      ).
      We performed MDS using phi coefficients between attributes (Figure 3). Multidimensional scaling provides a map in which terms are distributed in 2 dimensions. The proximity of terms in the bidimensional map indicates their similarity with respect to sensory properties. The results showed a stress value of 0.162 and high validity; according to
      • Granato D.
      • Ares G.
      , values below 0.1 are considered fair and those up to 0.20 are acceptable. As shown in Figure 3, it is possible to observe a correlation between natural requeijão cremoso flavor/aroma, spreadability, homogeneity, creaminess, easily melted in the mouth and brightness, which were coherent and desirable in a typical processed cheese. We also observed a good correlation for artificial requeijão cremoso flavor/aroma, fatty, viscosity, heterogeneity, gelatinous quality, and bitter taste. These characteristics are not desirable in traditional requeijão cremoso and may have been associated with the vegetable fat and other additives (i.e., flavorings, thickeners) used to mimic the characteristics of the traditional product (
      • Van Dender A.G.F.
      ). In addition, we observed an association between yellow color, buttery flavor, sweet taste, and acid taste in the upper left quadrant. The sweet and acid tastes may have been seen as similar by consumers because of a cross-modal interaction. Cross-modal taste and aroma interactions have been reported in the perception of cheese flavor (
      • Niimi J.
      • Overington A.R.
      • Silcock P.
      • Bremer P.J.
      • Delahunty C.M.
      Cross-modal taste and aroma interactions: Cheese flavor perception and changes in flavor character in multicomponent mixtures.
      ), and they should be taken in account in developing processed cheese.
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Figure 3Multidimensional scaling of phi coefficients using check-all-that-apply findings. Dim = dimension. Color version available online.
      These findings may be useful as a guideline for the processed cheese industry. Although one of the principal attributes of this processed cheese is natural requeijão cremoso natural flavor and aroma, it may also present with brightness, spreadability, homogeneity, creaminess, and easy melt in the mouth. Similar products should be formulated to achieve these characteristics. For example, the starch level will affect the texture of the sample, because starch interacts with the water in the cheese, forming a gel and making it firmer (
      • Mounsey J.S.
      • O'Riordan E.D.
      Characteristics of imitation cheese containing native starches.
      ;
      • Ferrão L.L.
      • Silva E.B.
      • Silva H.L.A.
      • Silva R.
      • Mollakhalili N.
      • Granato D.
      • Freitas M.Q.
      • Silva M.C.
      • Raices R.S.L.
      • Padilha M.C.
      • Zacarchenco P.B.
      • Barbosa M.I.M.J.
      • Mortazavian A.M.
      • Cruz A.G.
      Strategies to develop healthier processed cheeses: Reduction of sodium and fat contents and use of prebiotics.
      ). Vegetable fat levels will result in insufficient emulsification, illustrated by a highly hydrophobic character and more primary bonds, with a direct effect on fat globule structure (increased diameter). This in turn causes a decrease in protein-protein and protein-fat interactions in the processed cheese matrix, lowering the elasticity of the product and affecting its spreadability and ease of melting in the mouth (
      • Cunha C.R.
      • Dias A.I.
      • Viotto W.H.
      Microstructure, texture, colour and sensory evaluation of a spreadable processed cheese analogue made with vegetable fat.
      ).

      Comparison Between CATA and Descriptive Analysis

      We used multiple factor analysis to analyze the consensus configuration between DA and CATA. Multiple factor analysis explained 75% of the variability using 2 dimensions, in which the first dimension accounted for approximately 52% and the second dimension explained 23%. The RV coefficient values ranged from 0 to 1, with values closer to 1 suggesting adequate correlation between the methods (
      • Fonseca F.G.A.
      • Esmerino E.A.
      • Tavares Filho E.R.
      • Ferraz J.P.
      • Cruz A.G.
      • Bolini H.M.A.
      Novel and successful free comments method for sensory characterization of chocolate ice cream: A comparative study between pivot profile and comment analysis.
      ). In this study, the RV coefficient was 0.843 (P < 0.001), indicating that both methodologies provided similar information about the sensory characteristics of the samples.
      Figure 4 shows the consensus configuration of the samples associated with different colors according to each sensory methodology. The different positions show clear differences among samples, suggesting that consumers were able to discriminate appropriately between samples. The points corresponding to the 2 methods (CATA and DA) were close, suggesting that sample configurations were very similar for both methods, and that trained assessors and consumers perceived the samples similarly. Overall, our findings reinforced the use of descriptive methodologies with consumers—particularly CATA, because it is useful for small and medium dairy producers to obtain information about the sensory characteristics of their products that belong to the requeijão cremoso category. However, CATA, as with any other descriptive methodology using consumers, cannot be used as a replacement for DA; the latter is more accurate because assessors are extensively trained in the identification and quantification of sensory attributes, enabling them to detect minor differences in formulation (
      • Varela P.
      • Ares G.
      Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization.
      ).
      Figure thumbnail gr4
      Figure 4Consensus configuration between descriptive analysis (DA) and check-all-that-apply (CATA) findings for requeijão cremoso samples using multiple factor analysis. I = traditional requeijão cremoso; II, III, and IV = requeijão cremoso with added starch; V, VI = requeijão cremoso with added starch and vegetable fat. F = factor. Color version available online.
      Standardized formulation of products in the requeijão cremoso category is lacking in the Brazilian dairy industry. For this reason, CATA can be a valuable, reliable, and economic sensory method of establishing a sensory profile for requeijão cremoso formulations. The use of MDS and MDA based on phi coefficient values allowed us to develop an adequate understanding of the sensory profile of requeijão cremoso samples with added vegetable fat and starch, possibly serving as a guideline for dairy processors who wish to improve the formulation of their products in accordance with consumer perceptions.

      CONCLUSIONS

      The CATA questionnaire proved to be an effective tool for characterizing different samples of requeijão cremoso, showing results that correlated well with conventional descriptive analysis by trained assessors. Multidimensional alignment and multidimensional scaling based on phi coefficient values were important and useful alternatives for obtaining a deeper understanding of the CATA findings, adding information to the traditional analysis. Adoption of these methods should be encouraged for the processed cheese industry when it conducts sensory profiling with consumers and using a CATA questionnaire. Overall, the findings of the present study may useful for companies that manufacture dairy foods with similar or complex sensory characteristics.

      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

      The authors are grateful for the financial support of this research project provided by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil) and National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES, Brasilia, Brazil).

      REFERENCES

        • Albenzio M.
        • Santillo A.
        • Caroprese M.
        • Braghieri A.
        • Sevi A.
        • Napolitano F.
        Composition and sensory profiling of probiotic Scamorza ewe milk cheese.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96 (23522674): 2792-2800
        • Antunes L.
        • Vidal L.
        • Saldamando L.
        • Gimenez A.
        • Ares G.
        Comparison of consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization: Case study with four sample sets of powdered drinks.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2017; 56: 149-163
        • Aquino L.F.M.C.
        • Silva A.C.O.
        • Freitas M.Q.
        • Felicio T.L.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Conte-Junior C.A.
        Identifying cheese whey an adulterant in milk: Limited contribution of a sensometric approach.
        Food Res. Int. 2014; 62: 233-237
        • Ares G.
        • Barreiro C.
        • Deliza R.
        • Giménez A.
        • Gámbarro A.
        Application of a check-all-that-apply question to the development of chocolate milk desserts.
        J. Sens. Stud. 2010; 25: 67-86
        • Ares G.
        • Jaeger S.R.
        Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2013; 28: 141-153
        • Ares G.
        • Tárrega A.
        • Izquierdo L.
        • Jaeger S.R.
        Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2014; 31: 135-141
        • Bruzzone F.
        • Vidal L.
        • Antunez L.
        • Gimenez A.
        • Deliza R.
        • Ares G.
        Comparison of intensity scales and CATA questions in new product development: Sensory characterization and directions for product reformulation of milk desserts.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2015; 44: 183-193
        • Cadena R.S.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Faria J.A.F.
        • Bolini H.M.A.
        Reduced fat and sugar vanilla ice creams: Sensory profiling and external preference mapping.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2012; 95 (22916888): 4842-4850
        • Cadena R.S.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Rolim Netto R.
        • Castro W.F.
        • Faria J.A.F.
        • Bolini H.M.A.
        Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time.
        Food Res. Int. 2013; 54: 1670-1679
        • Carr B.T.
        • Dzuroska J.
        • Taylor R.O.
        • Lanza K.
        • Pansini C.
        Multidimensional alignment (MDA): A simple numerical tool for assessing the degree of association between products and attributes on perceptual maps. In 8th Rose-Marie Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Florence, Italy. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands2009
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Cadena R.S.
        • Alvaro M.B.V.B.
        • Sant'Ana A.S.
        • Oliveira C.A.F.
        • Faria J.A.F.
        • Bolini H.M.A.
        • Ferreira M.M.C.
        Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yogurts.
        LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013; 50: 210-214
        • Cunha C.R.
        • Dias A.I.
        • Viotto W.H.
        Microstructure, texture, colour and sensory evaluation of a spreadable processed cheese analogue made with vegetable fat.
        Food Res. Int. 2010; 43: 723-729
        • Dooley L.
        • Lee Y.
        • Meullenet J.
        The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2010; 21: 389-401
        • Drake M.A.
        Sensory analysis of dairy foods.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2007; 90 (17954731): 4925-4937
        • Felicio T.L.
        • Esmerino E.A.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Nogueira L.C.
        • Raices R.S.L.
        • Deliza R.
        • Bolini H.M.A.
        • Pollonio M.A.R.
        Cheese. What is its contribution to the sodium intake of Brazilians?.
        Appetite. 2013; 66: 84-88
        • Ferrão L.L.
        • Silva E.B.
        • Silva H.L.A.
        • Silva R.
        • Mollakhalili N.
        • Granato D.
        • Freitas M.Q.
        • Silva M.C.
        • Raices R.S.L.
        • Padilha M.C.
        • Zacarchenco P.B.
        • Barbosa M.I.M.J.
        • Mortazavian A.M.
        • Cruz A.G.
        Strategies to develop healthier processed cheeses: Reduction of sodium and fat contents and use of prebiotics.
        Food Res. Int. 2016; 86: 93-102
        • Fonseca F.G.A.
        • Esmerino E.A.
        • Tavares Filho E.R.
        • Ferraz J.P.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Bolini H.M.A.
        Novel and successful free comments method for sensory characterization of chocolate ice cream: A comparative study between pivot profile and comment analysis.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2016; 99 (26923040): 3408-3420
        • Garruti D.S.
        • Brito E.S.
        • Brandão T.M.
        • Uchôa Jr., P.
        • Silva M.A.P.P.
        Desenvolvimento do perfil sensorial e aceitação de requeijão cremoso.
        Cien. Tecnol. Alimentos. 2003; 23 ([In Portuguese]): 434-440
        • Gaze L.V.
        • Oliveira B.R.
        • Ferrao L.L.
        • Granato D.
        • Cavalcanti R.N.
        • Conte Junior C.A.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Freitas M.Q.
        Preference mapping of Dulce de leche commercialized in Brazilian markets.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2015; 98 (25557891): 1443-1454
        • Granato D.
        • Ares G.
        Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Food Science and Technology. Wiley Blackwell, Los Angeles, CA2014
        • Janiaski D.R.
        • Pimentel T.C.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Prudencio S.H.
        Strawberry-flavored yogurts and whey beverages: What is the sensory profile of the ideal product?.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2016; 99 (27157581): 5273-5283
        • Jaworska N.
        • Chupetlovska-Anastasova A.
        A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains.
        Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 2009; 5: 1-10
        • Kwab H.S.
        • Meullenet J.-F.
        • Lee Y.
        Sensory profile, consumer acceptance and driving sensory attributes for commercial vanilla ice creams marketed in the United States.
        Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2016; 69: 346-355
        • Macfie H.
        • Bratchell J.N.
        • Greenhoff K.
        • Vallis L.V.
        Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests.
        J. Sens. Stud. 1989; 4: 129-148
        • McMahon K.M.
        • Castura J.
        • Culver C.
        • Ross C.F.
        Perception of carbonation in sparkling wines using descriptive analysis (DA) and temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA).
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2017; 59: 14-26
        • Meyners M.
        • Castura J.C.
        • Carr T.
        Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2013; 30: 309-319
        • Mounsey J.S.
        • O'Riordan E.D.
        Characteristics of imitation cheese containing native starches.
        J. Food Sci. 2001; 66: 586-591
        • Murtaza M.A.
        • Rehman S.U.
        • Anjum F.M.
        • Huma N.
        Descriptive sensory profile of cow and buffalo milk Cheddar cheese prepared using indigenous cultures.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96 (23332853): 1380-1386
        • Niimi J.
        • Overington A.R.
        • Silcock P.
        • Bremer P.J.
        • Delahunty C.M.
        Cross-modal taste and aroma interactions: Cheese flavor perception and changes in flavor character in multicomponent mixtures.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2016; 48: 70-80
        • Oliveira R.B.A.
        • Margalho L.P.
        • Nascimento J.S.
        • Costa L.E.O.
        • Portela J.B.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Sant'Ana A.S.
        Processed cheese contamination by spore-forming bacteria: A review of sources, routes, fate during processing and control.
        Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016; 57: 11-19
        • Pimentel T.C.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Prudencio S.H.
        Influence of long-chain inulin and Lactobacillus paracasei subspecies paracasei on the sensory profile and acceptance of a traditional yogurt.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96 (23932139): 6233-6241
        • Pontual I.
        • Amaral G.V.
        • Esmerino E.A.
        • Pimentel T.C.
        • Freitas M.Q.
        • Fukuda R.K.
        • Sant'Ana I.L.
        • Silva L.G.
        • Cruz A.G.
        Assessing consumer expectations about pizza: A study on celiac and non-celiac individuals using the word association technique.
        Food Res. Int. 2017; 94 (28290358): 1-5
        • Santos B.A.
        • Campagnol P.C.B.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Galvão M.T.E.L.
        • Monteiro R.A.
        • Wagner R.
        • Pollonio M.A.R.
        Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: Comparison with trained panel.
        Food Res. Int. 2015; 76: 725-734
        • Santos B.A.
        • Pollonio M.A.R.
        • Cruz A.G.
        • Messias V.C.
        • Monteiro R.A.
        • Oliveira T.L.C.
        • Faria J.A.F.
        • Freitas M.Q.
        • Bolini H.M.A.
        Ultra-flash profile and projective mapping for describing sensory attributes of prebiotic mortadelas.
        Food Res. Int. 2013; 54: 1705-1711
        • Stone H.
        • Bleibaum R.N.
        • Thomas H.A.
        Sensory Evaluation Practices. 4th ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA2012
        • Tarrega A.
        • Marcano J.
        • Fiszman S.
        Yogurt viscosity and fruit pieces affect satiating capacity expectations.
        Food Res. Int. 2016; 89: 574-581
        • Valentin D.
        • Chollet S.
        • Lelievre M.
        • Abdi H.
        Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science.
        Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012; 47: 1563-1578
        • Van Dender A.G.F.
        Requeijão cremoso e outros queijos fundidos: Tecnologia de fabricação, controle do processo e aspectos de mercado. Fonte e Editora Ltda., São Paulo, Brazil2014 ([In Portuguese])
        • Varela P.
        • Ares G.
        Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization.
        Food Res. Int. 2012; 48: 893-908
        • Varela P.
        • Tárrega A.
        • Salvador A.
        • Leal A.A.
        • Flanagan J.
        • Roller M.
        • Feuilere N.
        • Issaly N.
        • Fiszman S.
        Diabetic and non-diabetic consumers' perception of an apple juice beverage supplemented with a Fraxinus excelsior L. seed extract having potential glucose homeostasis benefits.
        LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014; 57: 648-656
        • Vidal L.
        • Tárrega A.
        • Antúnez L.
        • Ares G.
        • Jaeger S.R.
        Comparison of correspondence analysis based on Hellinger and chi-squared distances to obtain sensory spaces from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions.
        Food Qual. Prefer. 2015; 43: 106-112