Experimental Design, Diets, and Management of Cows
All experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted at the William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute (Chazy, NY) in the Charles J. Sniffen Dairy Research and Education Complex. Sixteen lactating Holstein cows (8 ruminally cannulated) averaging 82 ± 3 (mean ± SE) DIM at the beginning of the experiment were blocked by cannulation status, DIM, and milk production and were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The study had 28-d periods. Each square was conducted concurrently; the first 17 d served as an adaptation period, and the last 11 d served as the collection period. Cows were enrolled on the study 14 d before period 1 began and were fed a TMR with no supplemental trace minerals or monensin (Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN).
Dietary treatments (
Table 1) were formulated to contain either conventional (
CON) or brown midrib-3 corn silage (
BM3) and either a sulfate (
STM) source of Cu, Zn, and Mn or hydroxy trace minerals (
HTM; IntelliBond Cu, Zn, and Mn; Micronutrients USA LLC, Indianapolis, IN). The objective for substitution of corn silage simply on a 1:1 DM basis was to allow the differences in fiber fractions among the diets to be determined primarily by the source of corn silage. The targeted supplemental concentrations of Cu, Zn, and Mn were 194, 1,657, and 687 mg/d, respectively. The 4 dietary treatments were CON and sulfate trace minerals (
CON-STM), CON and hydroxy trace minerals (
CON-HTM), BM3 and sulfate trace minerals (
BM3-STM), and BM3 and hydroxy trace minerals (
BM3-HTM). Diets were formulated using Cornell Net Carbohydrate Protein System biology (version 4.8; AMTS.Cattle.Professional, Agricultural Modeling & Training systems, LLC, Groton, NY). Inputs used for diet formulation included 29.9 kg/d DMI, 54 kg/d milk with 3.60% fat and 3.05% true protein, and 750 kg of BW. Cows were fed the diets as TMR for ad libitum intake (approximately 1.05× expected intake) once per day (fed at 1400 h; Calan Data Ranger, American Calan Inc., Northwood, NH) in a tiestall barn equipped with individual feed boxes.
Table 1Ingredient composition (% of DM) of diets fed to lactating Holstein cows
Data Collection, Sample Procedures, and Analytical Methods
Forages, diets, and orts were collected 3 times per week from d 1 to 17 and daily from d 18 to 28. Grain mixes were collected once per week from d 1 to 17 and daily from d 18 to 28. A portion of each sample was dried in a forced-air oven at 105°C to constant weight for determination of DM. Diets were adjusted for changes in DM content of the feed ingredients when a feed ingredient DM value was outside the range of the DM mean ± 1.2 standard deviations or a new feed ingredient source was used or delivered.
Starting on d 18 of each period, a portion of the feed ingredients, diets, and orts collected daily was stored frozen at −20°C, and then composited by period by combining equal volumes of the daily as-fed samples. The composites of feed ingredients were analyzed for chemical composition (CPM Plus; Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc., Waynesboro, PA). Analyses included DM, ash (method 942.05;
), OM (method 942.05;
), CP (method 990.03;
), soluble protein according to
, fat (method 2003.05;
), ADF (method 973.18;
), NDF using α-amylase (
Van Soest et al., 1991- Van Soest P.J.
- Robertson J.B.
- Lewis B.A.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition..
), ADL (
Goering and Van Soest, 1970Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.
), starch according to
Hall, 2009Analysis of starch, including maltooligosaccharides, in animal feeds: A comparison of methods and a recommended method for AOAC collaborative study..
, sugar as ethanol soluble carbohydrates according to
DuBois et al., 1956- DuBois M.
- Gilles K.A.
- Hamilton J.K.
- Rebers P.A.
- Smith F.
Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances..
, and minerals (method 985.01;
).
Fermentation analysis was performed on the ensiled forage composite samples (Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc.). A 25-g wet sample was diluted with 200 mL of water, blended, and filtered through 20- to 25-µm filter paper. The extract was used to determine pH with a Mettler DL12 pH Titrator (Mettler-Toledo LLC, Columbus, OH) and NH3-N in a 1:3 ratio of extract and water with a Labconco Rapidstill II model 65200 analyzer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO). Lactic acid was determined in a 1:1 ratio of extract and water with a YSI 2700 Select Biochemistry Analyzer (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH). Acetic, propionic, butyric, and isobutyric acid concentrations were determined using a Perkin Elmer AutoSystem gas chromatograph with a Restek column packed with Stabilwax-DA (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT).
Fiber characteristics and NDF digestibility at 30 h (
NDFd at 30 h) were determined on the forage and grain composite samples (Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc.). Undigested NDF at 30, 120, and 240 h (
uNDF30om, uNDF120om, uNDF240om, respectively) for forages and uNDF at 12, 72, and 120 h (
uNDF12om, uNDF72om, and
uNDF120om, respectively) for grains were assessed using a Tilley-Terry rumen fermentation system (
Raffrenato et al., 2018- Raffrenato E.
- Ross D.A.
- Van Amburgh M.E.
Development of an in vitro method to determine rumen undigested aNDFom for use in feed evaluation..
; Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc.). Starch digestibility at 7 h (
Hall, 2009Analysis of starch, including maltooligosaccharides, in animal feeds: A comparison of methods and a recommended method for AOAC collaborative study..
; Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc.) was determined on the period composite samples of corn silage and grain mixes. A portion of the period composite for forage and grain mixes was used to determine particle size distribution on a DM basis (55°C) by dry vertical sieving (Ro-Tap testing sieve shaker model B; W. S. Tyler Combustion Engineering, Inc., Mentor, OH). The physical effectiveness factor (
pef) was defined as the fraction of particles retained on the 1.18-mm screen or greater. Physically effective NDF (
peNDF) of a forage or diet was calculated as the product of its NDF content and its pef (
Mertens, 1997Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows..
).
Individual DMI was determined by recording feed offered and refused daily. Samples of diets and orts were collected daily (d 18 to 28) during each period, and a portion of each sample was dried in a forced-air oven at 105°C to constant weight for DM determination.
Cows were milked 3 times daily (0430, 1230, and 2030 h) in a double-12 parallel milking parlor (Xpressway Parallel Stall System; Bou-Matic, Madison, WI). Milk yield was recorded electronically at each milking daily (d 18 to 28) for each period (ProVantage Information Management System; Bou-Matic). Milk samples from 6 consecutive milkings for each cow were collected on d 25 and 26 of each period. The milk samples were analyzed for fat, true protein, lactose (anhydrous), solids nonfat, urea nitrogen, and de novo, mixed, and preformed fatty acids by mid-infrared procedures (CombiScope FTIR 300 Hp; Delta Instruments, Drachten, the Netherlands;
Wojciechowski and Barbano, 2016- Wojciechowski K.L.
- Barbano D.M.
Prediction of fatty acid chain length and unsaturation of milk fat by mid-infrared milk analysis..
;
Wojciechowski et al., 2016- Wojciechowski K.L.
- Melilli C.
- Barbano D.M.
A proficiency test system to improve performance of milk analysis methods and produce reference values for component calibration samples for infrared milk analysis..
;
Woolpert et al., 2016- Woolpert M.E.
- Dann H.M.
- Cotanch K.W.
- Melilli C.
- Chase L.E.
- Grant R.J.
- Barbano D.M.
Management, nutrition, and lactation performance are related to bulk tank milk de novo fatty acid concentration on Northeastern US dairy farms..
). Somatic cell count was analyzed by flow cytometry (CombiScope FTIR 300 Hp, Delta Instruments). Daily milk samples were mathematically composited after analysis in proportion to milk yield at each sampling. Somatic cell count was transformed and analyzed as SCS according to
Shook, 1993Genetic improvement of mastitis through selection on somatic cell count..
using the equation: SCS = log
2(SCC/100) + 3, where SCC was in units of 1,000 cells/mL. Energy-corrected milk was calculated using a formula modified to account for the use of true protein instead of total protein (
; Mark Stephenson, University of Wisconsin;
https://dairymarkets.org/PubPod/Reference/Library/Energy%20Corrected%20Milk): 0.327 × kg of milk + 12.95 × kg of fat + 7.65 × kg of true protein.
Feed efficiency (kg/kg) was calculated and expressed as milk per DMI and ECM per DMI for d 18 through d 28 of each period. Body weight was measured (Allweigh computerized scale; Allweigh Scale System Inc., Red Deer, AB, Canada) and BCS was assigned in 0.25-unit increments on a scale of 1 to 5 (
Ferguson et al., 1994- Ferguson J.D.
- Galligan D.T.
- Thomsen N.
Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows..
) by 2 trained individuals independently at the beginning of the study and on d 28 of each period.
Total-tract digestibility of DM, OM, aNDFom, and starch was determined on d 20 to 23 of each period. Samples of diets and orts were collected on d 20 to 23. Representative samples of the diets were taken and composited by treatment. Representative samples of the orts were collected for each cow and composited by cow. Fecal grab samples were collected d 21 through 23 for each period so that every 3 h in a 24-h period were represented (8 samples total). Fecal samples from each cow were composited by combining approximately 118 mL of wet feces from each time point. Samples of diets, orts, and feces were frozen at −20°C, dried in a forced-air oven at 55°C for 48 h, ground to pass through a 1-mm screen (Wiley mill; Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA), and submitted for chemical analysis (Cumberland Valley Analytical Services Inc.). Composite samples of diets (by period), orts (by cow and period), and feces (by cow and period) were analyzed for DM, OM, ADF, aNDFom, and starch (
Van Soest et al., 1991- Van Soest P.J.
- Robertson J.B.
- Lewis B.A.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition..
;
Hall, 2009Analysis of starch, including maltooligosaccharides, in animal feeds: A comparison of methods and a recommended method for AOAC collaborative study..
; method 942.05,
; method 973.18,
). The uNDF240om concentration was used as an internal marker. Total-tract digestibility was calculated by the ratio technique using the concentrations of the nutrients and uNDF240om in the diet and feces (
Maynard et al., 1979- Maynard L.A.
- Loosli J.K.
- Hintz H.F.
- Warner R.G.
Digestive processes in different species.
). The nutrient content of the diet used in the digestibility calculation was adjusted for each cow based on the nutrient composition of the diet offered and refused. Digested nutrients were calculated by nutrient intake multiplied by the total-tract digestibility of that nutrient.
Cows were monitored for chewing activity (eating or ruminating) and posture (standing or lying) every 5 min for 3 consecutive 24-h periods (d 23 to 25) for each study period. Chewing observations continued while cows were being milked, for a total of 72 h of chewing behavior observations. Total time (in min) spent on each activity for each day was quantified by multiplying the total number of observations for that activity by 5 min. The number of bouts of eating and the length of each bout were recorded. A bout was defined as at least 2 consecutive observations of eating behavior not interrupted by more than 2 observations of a different behavior (
Black et al., 2016- Black R.A.
- Grant R.J.
- Krawczel P.D.
Short communication: Short-term changes in stocking density did not alter meal characteristics of lactating Holstein dairy cattle..
).
Statistical Analysis
Data from the analysis of feed ingredients and diets were analyzed using the MEANS procedure of SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC), and were reported as descriptive statistics (mean ± standard error).
Two cows were removed from the final data set used for statistical analysis. One of the cows failed to respond to antibiotic and supportive therapy for mastitis that was caused by Enterobacter (Quality Milk Production Services, Ithaca, NY). The other cow had severe digestive upset that caused a dramatic decrease in feed intake and milk production during period 4, and she never recovered. Thus, 14 cows (8 cannulated cows and 6 non-cannulated cows) were used in the statistical analysis.
Data with a normal distribution (DMI, milk yield and composition, feed efficiency, BW, BCS, chewing behaviors, and total-tract digestibility) were analyzed as a replicated Latin square design (Latin rectangle) with fixed effects of corn silage, trace mineral, corn silage × trace mineral interaction, period within replicated square, and replicated square using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Cow within replicated square was a random effect. Repeated measurements of performance data from the collection period (e.g., DMI, milk yield and composition, feed efficiency, chewing behaviors, and total-tract digestibility) were reduced to period means for each cow before statistical analysis. Significance was declared at P ≤ 0.05 and trends at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.