If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaBeijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaDepartment of Biology, College of Science and Mathematics, California State University, Fresno 93740
College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, ChinaBeijing Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Reduced-fat foods have become more popular due to their health benefits; however, reducing the fat content of food affects the sensory experience. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the sensory acceptance of reduced-fat foods to that of full-fat equivalents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding whey protein microgels (WPM) with an average diameter of 4 μm, or WPM with adsorbed anthocyanins [WPM (Ant)] on the textural and sensory properties of reduced-fat Cheddar cheese (RFC). Reduced-fat Cheddar cheese was prepared in 2 ways: (1) by adding WPM, designated as RFC+M, or (2) by adding WPM (Ant), designated as RFC+M (Ant). For comparison, RFC without fat substitutes and full-fat Cheddar cheese were also prepared. We discovered that the addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) increased the moisture content, fluidity, and meltability of RFC, and reduced its hardness, springiness, and chewiness. The textural and sensory characteristics of RFC were markedly inferior to those of full-fat Cheddar cheese, whereas addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) significantly improved the sensory characteristics of RFC. The WPM and WPM (Ant) showed a high potential as fat substitutes and anthocyanin carriers to effectively improve the acceptance of reduced-fat foods.
). However, the fat content of full-fat cheese often ranges from 25 to 35%. Excessive dietary intake of fat increases the risk of diseases such as obesity, coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes, and colon cancer (
). Thus, reduced-fat foods are increasingly demanded by consumers. Fat, however, plays an important role in the mechanical behavior, sensory attributes, and color of dairy products such as cheese. Fat acts as a plasticizer of the casein matrix, reducing the mechanical strength and softening cheese. Free fatty acids produced by lipolysis are the main flavor components of cheese (
). Reduced-fat cheese usually has a bland taste, dull appearance, and a harder, more rubbery mechanical behavior, resulting in poor consumer acceptance (
). The textural and flavor characteristics of cheeses are important indicators for their quality and play an important role in their perception by consumers. Color is also an important factor in evaluating the quality of cheese, as it has a major influence on the purchasing decisions of consumers (
). Therefore, it is necessary to improve the sensory attributes of reduced-fat cheese to develop diversified products and increase consumer acceptance (
Fat substitutes are a potential solution to improve the mechanical behavior of reduced-fat foods. Fat substitutes are ingredients that can mimic a fat-like mouthfeel and ameliorate the rheological and sensory defects caused by the low fat content by substituting for the structural functions of fat in foods (
). These protein hydrogels have soft textures and excellent lubricity, which can simulate the properties of fat globules, thereby contributing a pleasing mouthfeel (
). If the fat-substitute particles are smaller than the pores of the casein network, they can be easily accommodated, but if they are larger, the structural integrity of the casein could be disrupted (
). Few studies, however, have controlled the particle size of fat substitutes to mimic the functional properties of milk fat, especially in reduced-fat cheese applications. Therefore, it is important to control the particle size of fat substitutes to accurately mimic the properties of milk fat during cheesemaking.
In addition to textural characteristics, color is also an important factor affecting the sensory attributes of cheese. Anthocyanins are red or purple, water-soluble edible pigments widely occurring in plants (
) that are used as food coloring agents. Furthermore, anthocyanins also have many health benefits such as antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, and antihypoglycemic activities (
). Anthocyanins, however, are sensitive to environmental conditions, such as high pH, high temperature, and light, which can change their color and influence their biological activity (
); consequently, this limits their application in food. The delivery of anthocyanins by carriers is a potential solution for improving their stability in foods.
In this study, whey protein microgels (WPM) were added to reduced-fat Cheddar cheese (RFC) to replace and simulate the functions of fat globules. Anthocyanins were adsorbed onto WPM via electrostatic interaction [WPM (Ant)] and then also added to RFC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding WPM or WPM (Ant) to RFC on the physicochemical characteristics such as composition, color, mechanical behavior, rheological properties, and microstructure compared with full-fat Cheddar cheese (FFC) and RFC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Fresh cow's milk was purchased from Sanyuan Food Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Whey protein isolate powder was from Davisco Foods International Inc. (Le Sueur, MN). Polyglycerol polyricinoleate was from DuPont Danisco (Copenhagen, Denmark). Soybean oil was from Arowana Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Chymosin and starter culture (R704) were from Chr. Hansen Co., Ltd. (VIC, Australia). Rennet (Chymax plus, FPC, 890 IMCU/g) was from Duo Aite Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were from Beijing Chemical Factory (Beijing, China). Ultrapure water was prepared via Millipore Super Q apparatus (Burlington, MA).
Preparation of WPM and WPM (Ant)
To prepare WPM, whey protein solution (10% wt/wt) was mixed with soybean oil containing 2.5% wt/wt polyglycerol polyricinoleate in a volume ratio of 1:10, and an oil-in-water emulsion was prepared at 6,500 rpm, 9,500 rpm, and 13,500 rpm, respectively, in an Ultra-Turrax IKA T25 disperser (IKA, Königswinter, Germany). The emulsions were then heated at 80°C for 1 h. The WPM were isolated by washing out the oil phase with sodium caseinate solution (4% wt/wt;
). To prepare WPM (Ant), anthocyanin (0.1% wt/vol) and WPM (0.01% wt/vol) solutions were mixed in a volume ratio of 1:8 and stirred at 4,600 × g for 1 h at room temperature. After centrifugation at 6,900 × g for 10 min, the precipitate was collected to obtain WPM (Ant).
Microscopic Observation of WPM
Microscopic imaging of WPM was performed using an inverted microscope (Axio Vert.A1, ZEISS, Germany). Samples were dispersed in distilled water before analysis. A drop of sample suspension was placed on the slide, then covered with a coverslip. Six pictures were recorded for each sample.
Determination of Size Distribution of WPM
The particle size distribution of the WPM was determined using a Mastersizer 3000 (Malvern Instrument Co., Ltd., Mlavern, UK). Before analysis, WPM were diluted 1:10 with ultrapure water. Wet measurement in manual mode was selected and the test conditions were set as follows: dispersant, ultrapure water; the refractive index of the WPM and water used were 1.50 and 1.33, respectively; material absorption, 0.001; measurement time, 10 s; optical density, 6 to 10%. The system was cleaned with ultrapure water at the beginning and end of each measurement.
Cheese Preparation Process
Cheese production was carried out in the Dairy Laboratory of the College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering of the China Agricultural University (Beijing, China). Four types of cheese were made from 36 kg of milk in 1 d including FFC, RFC, RFC with WPM (RFC+M), and RFC with WPM (Ant) [RFC+M (Ant)]. Each type of cheese was made in triplicate. For cheese production, skim milk was mixed with pasteurized and homogenized cream to obtain the desired fat levels. Cheddar cheese was made following the procedures of
with the following modifications: milk was pasteurized at 63°C for 30 min and then cooled rapidly to 32°C in a water bath. Milk was fermented with direct-injection starter R-704 at a level of 0.05 g/L and then incubated at 32°C for 30 min. After that, rennet was added at a level of 0.05 g/L to each milk sample; subsequently, the WPM and WPM (Ant) were added to RFC+M and RFC+M (Ant) samples, respectively. The quantity of fat replacers used in making RFC+M was 10 g of WPM in 3 kg of milk. The same quantity of WPM (Ant) was added to make RFC+M (Ant). The milk was left undisturbed for 45 min to coagulate. The curd was cut into cubes (1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 cm) and healed for 5 min, slowly increasing the temperature from 32°C to 38°C at a rate of 5 min/°C. The curd was cooked at 38°C until the pH reached 6.15, and then the whey was drained. The curd was then flipped and stacked every 15 min, and the remaining whey was drained until the pH reached 5.45. Finally, the cheese blocks were salted (2.5% wt/wt of the curd), then pressed at 0.4 to 0.6 MPa overnight. The pressed cheese samples (cut into 5 equal blocks of 5 × 5 × 5 cm for mechanical behavior, rheological, and sensory analysis; the rest of the cheese samples were used for chemical, color, and microstructure analysis) were vacuum-packed and stored at 4°C for 2 mo. The chemical composition analysis was done for cheese samples at d 1 only. The microscopic structures of cheese were tested at d 1, 30, and 60 respectively. The color, mechanical and rheological analysis were tested at d 1, 15, 30, 45, and 60 respectively.
; in the calculation, the added WPM, or anthocyanin-WPM (Ant) were included in the starting weight of milk. Dry matter yield was calculated by the following formula: DM yield = actual yield × (100 − MD)/100, where MD is the moisture content of the cheese (
). The color parameters were measured using a colorimeter (model CM-700d1, Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). In the color analysis included the lightness value (L), which ranges from 0 to 100, and a higher L value indicates a whiter sample (
); the red-green value (a*), and the blue-yellow value (b*). The sample was cut to a thickness of 40 mm and a diameter of 40 mm, and each test was repeated 3 times.
Mechanical Behavior Analysis
Mechanical behavior analysis was performed using a TMS-Pro Texture Analyzer (Food Technology Corp., Sterling, VA), and the cheese samples were prepared as described by
. The cheese samples were cut into cubes (2 × 2 × 2 cm), placed in a sealed plastic bag to prevent moisture loss, and equilibrated for 1 h at room temperature before measurement. Testing conditions were as follows: pretest speed = 1.00 mm/s, test speed = 0.4 mm/s, posttest speed = 1.00 mm/s; samples were compressed to 50% of the original height in 2 cycle tests. Cheese samples were evaluated for hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, and chewiness.
Rheological Analysis
A temperature sweep test was performed on the cheese samples as described previously (
). The cheese samples were taken from the fridge and equilibrated for 30 min at room temperature. A sample with a diameter of 40 mm and a thickness of 2 mm was cut and placed on the rheometer tray. Before testing, the cheese samples were coated with glycerin to prevent the samples from drying out. The program parameters were as follows: shear strain was 0.005, angular frequency was 1 Hz, heating rate was 3°C/min, and temperature rise range was 20 to 80°C.
Microstructure Observation by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope
Microscopic structures of cheese were imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (Model A1Rsi, Nikon, Shang Hai, China). Cheese samples were prepared as described previously (
) with some modifications. The proteins and fat globules in cheese samples were labeled with Fast Green and Nile Red ethanolic staining solutions, respectively. To observe the distribution of WPM in reduced-fat cheese, WPM were labeled with Rhodamine B and Fast Green solution (1:1) in advance. The slide was placed upside down on the 60× oil mirror for observation by CLSM. Rhodamine B was excited at 544 nm, Nile red was excited at 488 nm, and Fast Green was excited at 633 nm.
Sensory Evaluation
The cheeses were evaluated after 60 d of maturation by 20 panelists (10 men and 10 women) recruited from the College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering of the China Agricultural University (Beijing, China). All panelists recruited had past experience with sensory evaluation of Cheddar cheese for 12 h. Informed consent was given by all participants before participation. Based on relevant previous studies (
Sodium reduction and flavor enhancer addition in probiotic prato cheese: Contributions of quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations for sensory profiling.
), the definitions and scoring standards of terms used for sensory evaluation were established (Table 1). Twenty panelists were trained 3 times on the definition of appearance, hardness, springiness, color, cheese flavor, chewiness, creaminess, bitterness, acidity, saltiness, and scoring standards of each index (Table 1), and each training session lasted for 2 h. After each training session, all panelists were required to evaluate the designated Cheddar cheese samples. After the evaluation, we scored the results of each panelist to measure their proficiency. They were all required to be proficient in the relevant definition of terms and evaluation standards according to Table 1 to guarantee the accuracy of the sensory evaluation. If the proficiency level did not meet the requirements, retraining was conducted. A 10-point intensity scale (with 1 being the lowest score and 10 being the highest score) was used for each term in the sensory evaluation (
). The cheese samples taken from the 4°C refrigerator were allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for 30 min before the samples were cut into cubes (2 × 2 × 2 cm), numbered, and randomly assigned to panelists. To eliminate the influence between various samples, the panelists were required to rinse their mouths with water after tasting a sample. The data were made into a radar chart to visualize the evaluation scores.
Table 1Definitions and evaluation standards of terms related to sensory evaluation of the experimental cheeses
Attribute
Definition
Scoring standard
Lowest score (1)
Highest score (10)
Appearance
General macroscopic characteristics of cheese samples
Loose and fragile
Complete structure and smooth with few breaks
Hardness
The force required to break a sample between teeth
Very hard
Not hard
Springiness
The ability of the cheese sample to return to its original shape after finger pressing
The sample is not easy to deform
The sample is easy to deform
Color
The color of the cheese
Not yellow or bright-colored
Very yellow or bright-colored
Cheese flavor
The flavor intensity perceived after chewing the cheese sample
Each cheese sample was made in triplicate and analysis was carried out in each of the triplicates. Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA in SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation for triplicate replicates of each sample. The differences between the means were considered significant at P < 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of WPM Prepared by Oil-in-Water Emulsion Cross-Linking
Microscopic images showed that the WPM were spherical and transparent (Figure 1A). The particle size distribution (Figure 1B) at 6,500 rpm was wider than that at 9,500 rpm and 13,500 rpm (i.e., as the mixing rate increased, the particle size distribution of the WPM became narrower). The average particle size of WPM also decreased with increasing mixing rates (P < 0.05) in the following order: 6,500 rpm (4.03 μm) > 9,500 rpm (2.28 μm) > 13,500 rpm (1.87 μm), shown in Figure 1C. The shape and size of the WPM are important factors affecting their abilities to simulate fat globules (
). In this study, WPM prepared at 6,500 rpm were selected to replace part of the fat in RFC because their average particle size was the same as that of milk fat globules around 4 μm (
Figure 1Characterization of whey protein microgels (WPM) prepared at different mixing rates (6,500 rpm, 9,500 rpm, and 13,500 rpm). (A) Optical microscopy images; (B) particle size distribution of WPM under different mixing rates; (C) average particle size of WPM produced by different mixing rates. All results are expressed as the mean ± SE (n =3). Different letters indicate that average particle size of WPM are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Chemical Composition of Test Cheeses During Maturation
The composition of the full- and reduced-fat milks used to make the cheese samples was measured. The protein content of the reduced-fat milk used for preparing RFC was increased and the lactose content was reduced (P < 0.05), but there was no effect (P > 0.05) on the pH compared with the full-fat milk (Table 2). Four types of Cheddar cheese [i.e., FFC, RFC, WPM (RFC+M), and (RFC+M (Ant)] were prepared. Their chemical composition during ripening was measured (Table 3). The protein and moisture contents of RFC were significantly higher than those of FFC (P < 0.05), which is consistent with a previous report (
). The addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) had a negligible effect on the fat content of the RFC (P > 0.05), but the values of moisture content, moisture in nonfat substances (MNFS), and water-to-protein ratio of RFC+M and RFC+M (Ant) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher compared with RFC. One of the effective strategies to overcome the hardness of reduced-fat cheese is to increase its moisture content, and one way to achieve this is to make the water-to-protein ratio or MNFS value of RFC similar to that of FFC (
). The increased moisture content of RFC with added WPM and WPM (Ant) may be related to the water-binding capacity of whey protein microparticles. During the gelling process, whey protein forms a network structure, which retains a large amount of water (
). In addition, WPM act as fillers at the curd stage, which reduces the drainage of water from the casein network. Adding other fat substitutes such as oat-β-glucan or xanthan gum can also increase the moisture content of RFC (
, the pH value of the FFC was lower than that of RFC, which may be related to the decreased MNFS and water-to-protein ratio. The addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) increased the water-to-protein ratio of RFC. A higher water-to-protein ratio would be expected to weaken the buffering capacity and cause the pH of RFC to decrease. The actual yield of RFC was lower than that of FFC, but the addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) slightly increased the yield of RFC. The same trend was also observed in DM yield. Although the moisture content of RFC was increased, the increased moisture did not completely replace the lost fat content. Therefore, the volume of the filler in the casein network structure was reduced, and the yield of the RFC was lower. The increased yield of RFC with added WPM and WPM (Ant) may, at least partially, result from the added weight of WPM and WPM (Ant).
also reported a higher yield for RFC made with 0.50% microparticulate whey proteins as fat replacer.
Color Analysis of Various Cheeses During Maturation
The color analysis included the lightness value (L), the red-green value (a*), and the blue-yellow value (b*). The L, a*, and b* values of 4 types of cheese samples at different maturation time points were measured (Table 4) in the color analysis. From d 15 of maturity, the FFC had significantly higher L values (P < 0.05) compared with RFC, RFC+M, and RFC+M (Ant). The addition of WPM increased the L values of RFC, which were significantly (P < 0.05) higher with RFC+M at d 15 of maturation. However, the addition of WPM (Ant) reduced the L value of RFC+M (Ant) significantly (P < 0.05) below those of RFC and RFC+M. The a* values of FFC, RFC, and RFC+M were negative, indicating that these cheeses showed a greenish characteristic. The difference between the red-green values of RFC+M and RFC was significant (P < 0.05) at 45 and 60 d of maturation. As might be expected, RFC+M (Ant) showed positive a* values (more reddish) and was significantly (P < 0.05) different from FFC, RFC, and RFC+M during maturation. The b* values of all cheeses increased up to 15 d of maturation, then decreased (P < 0.05). The RFC had lower b* values at 1, 15, 30, and 45 d of maturation compared with FFC. The b* values of FFC, RFC, RFC+M, and RFC+M (Ant) were positive, indicating that these cheeses showed a yellowish characteristic (
). The addition of WPM increased the b* values of RFC above that of FFC. The b* values between RFC+M versus FFC and RFC+M versus RFC were significantly different at 30, 45, and 60 d of maturity (P < 0.05). However, the b* value of RFC+M (Ant) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of the other cheeses during the whole maturation process. The L, a*, and b* values of 2 commercial cheeses (CC1 and CC2) were measured and compared with those of FFC, RFC, RFC+M, and RFC+M (Ant) at 60 d of maturation. From Supplemental Table S1 (https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18450), the L values of all cheese samples were in the range of 0 to 100, and the order of L value was CC1 > FFC > CC2 > RFC+M > RFC > RFC+M (Ant). The CC1 showed the lowest negative a* value in all cheese samples. Similar to RFC+M (Ant), the a* value of CC2 was also positive but lower than that of RFC+M (Ant). The b* values of CC2 was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of the other 5 cheese samples. Interestingly, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between b* values of CC1 and RFC+M. In general, cheeses added WPM and WPM (Ant) were whiter than 2 commercial cheeses. The b* value of cheese with WPM was very close to that of commercial cheese CC1, and both of them tended to have a yellowish tinge. Compared with cheese with WPM, commercial cheese CC2 tended to have a red hue. However, cheese with anthocyanins added was redder than CC2.
Table 4Changes in the lightness value (L), red-green value (a*), and blue-yellow value (b*) of cheese ripened for 1, 15, 30, 45, and 60 d at 4°C; all results are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 3)
). The lower lightness and blue-yellow values of the RFC indicated that it was darker and less yellow than FFC. The higher protein content but lower fat and moisture-to-protein ratio of RFC resulted in a denser casein network and less light scattering centers (
). Addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) appears to increase the level of light scattering centers, and thereby increase the opacity of reduced-fat cheese. The change in cheese opacity is related to the degree of aggregation of proteins within the cheese matrix (
), which suggests that the addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) affects protein aggregation. Similarly, reduced-fat cheese with added inulin and sodium alginate have a higher L value (
). The addition of anthocyanins can improve the appearance and color of reduced-fat cheese, and thereby consumers' perceptions; the health benefits may also be enhanced by the antioxidant activity of anthocyanins (
Mechanical Properties of Test Cheeses During Maturation
The measured hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, and chewiness values of the 4 types of cheese were determined (Table 5). The hardness and springiness of all cheeses decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after 60 d of maturity. It is not surprising that RFC had much higher hardness than FFC, which agrees with a previous report (
). The addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) significantly reduced the hardness of RFC throughout the maturation phase, which may be related to its increased moisture content. This finding was consistent with other studies reporting improvements in cheese textural attributes using other fat substitutes (
Compared with FFC, reduced-fat content had an effect on the cohesiveness of the cheese during maturation. The addition of WPM (Ant) had a greater effect on the cohesiveness of reduced-fat cheese than RFC+M, which may be related to the binding and cross-linking between anthocyanins and proteins. A previous report found that in the early maturation period, the hardness of low-fat cheese decreased with increasing concentrations of whey protein microparticles, but the cohesiveness showed the opposite trend (
The springiness of RFC was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of FFC on the d 1, 30, and 60 of storage. Although the addition of WPM decreased the springiness value of RFC, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between RFC+M and RFC during maturation. Over the maturation period up to d 45, the springiness of RFC with WPM (Ant) was lower than that of RFC+M and RFC.
The chewiness value of RFC was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of FFC (P < 0.05) during maturation. The addition of WPM significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the chewiness value of reduced-fat cheese, and there was no significant difference between RFC+M and FFC on the d 30 and 60 of maturation. Similarly, the chewiness value of RFC+M (Ant) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of RFC.
The mechanical behavior and structure of cheese are affected by the relative content of fat, protein, and moisture (
). The milk fat globules fill in the porous protein matrix to make cheese smooth and soft. As maturation proceeds, the network structure of cheese becomes more uniform, which also affects its textural characteristics. Reducing the fat content increases the possibility of protein-protein interactions. The number of voids in reduced-fat cheese is reduced, and the cheese protein structure becomes denser. Thus, reduced-fat cheeses exhibit firmer and more rubbery texture than full-fat cheeses (
). Combined with the observation of the microstructure of cheeses, the even distribution of WPM and WPM (Ant) through the protein matrix not only increased the moisture content of the reduced-fat cheese, but also appeared to prevent the formation of a denser casein network structure, resulting in a looser network of casein and a softer texture of the cheese. The RFC containing WPM and WPM (Ant) in this study had larger MNFS and water-to-protein ratio values, and consequently, the hardness of the cheese decreased. This agrees with previous studies that suggest that an effective way to improve the textural qualities of reduced-fat cheese is to increase the MNFS and water-to-protein ratio values of the cheese, thereby increasing the softness of the cheese (
Use of microparticulated whey protein concentrate, exopolysaccharide-producing Streptococcus thermophilus, and adjunct cultures for making low-fat Italian Caciotta-type cheese.
). During maturation, the decrease in cheese hardness may result from a reduction in cross-linking between caseins, caused by hydrolysis of colloidal calcium phosphate, which weakens the casein network structure (
). The reduction in cheese hardness during maturation has also been associated with the proteolysis of a large amount of αS1-casein in the casein matrix (
). The denser casein structure of reduced-fat cheese is associated with higher cohesion and springiness. Compared with the lower hardness and springiness of full-fat cheese, fat reduction makes the cheese firmer and springier (
). The addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) may weaken the intermolecular forces in the cheese and affect the strength of the protein matrix, resulting in a change in the cohesiveness and springiness of RFC.
Rheological Properties of Test Cheeses During Maturation
The storage modulus (G‘) and loss modulus (G″) are parameters for the elastic and viscous components, respectively, of viscoelastic materials (
). The temperature sweep test measured the G’ and G″ values of cheese as a function of temperature (20–80°C). At the early stage of the temperature increase (Figure 2), the G' of all cheese samples was higher than G″, indicating that the cheese had elastic-dominant behavior (
The effect of fat replacement by inulin on the physicochemical properties and microstructure of acid casein processed cheese analogues with added whey protein polymers.
). The G' value of all cheeses decreased gradually with increasing scanning temperature, and the same trend was observed in G“. The protein matrix in cheese is disrupted by increasing temperature, weakening the interaction between molecules and resulting in decreased elasticity and increased fluidity (
). During the 60 d of maturation, the higher G' value of RFC may have resulted from the reduced-fat content, which promoted stronger interactions between proteins in the casein matrix. In addition, the lower fat content led to the formation of a denser casein network, which increased the elasticity and mechanical behavior of the cheeses (
). The addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) reduced the G' and G″ values of RFC+M and RFC+M (Ant) at 20°C compared with RFC. The lower G' and G″ values of RFC+M and RFC+M (Ant) may be attributed to the filling of WPM and WPM (Ant) into the cheese network, which reduced protein molecular interactions and weakened the gel structure of the cheese.
observed that cheeses with greater maturity have lower G' values. As the cheese matures, the protein is continuously hydrolyzed by proteases, which reduces the integrity of the internal structure of the cheese, resulting in a decreased G' value during the maturation (
Figure 2Changes in (A) storage modulus (G') and (B) loss modulus (G″) of test cheeses during the ripening process as a function of temperature. FFC = full-fat Cheddar cheese; RFC = reduced-fat Cheddar cheese; RFC+M = RFC with whey microprotein gels; RFC+M (Ant) = RFC with anthocyanin-whey microprotein gels.
Images from the CLSM (Figure 3) showed that FFC contained many fat globules (red); these were noticeably fewer in RFC. In addition, the continuous protein matrix in RFC was denser and more homogeneous, which explained the higher hardness value of RFC compared with that of FFC. An even distribution of WPM (orange globular particles) and WPM (Ant) (green globular particles) was observed throughout the casein network of RFC+M and RFC+M (Ant). The presence of spherical WPM particles could still be observed at 30 and 60 d of maturity. It appeared that WPM were incorporated into the casein matrix during curd formation and that the heat-cross-linked whey protein microgels were not easily hydrolyzed by proteases during maturation. This was an advantageous feature because WPM was retained during cheese maturation, and consequently improved the mechanical behavior of RFC. Moreover, fat in all of the cheeses had accumulated into larger globules on the d 30 and 60 of maturity than in the 1-d cheese.
described a similar result. Holes appeared in all cheeses as the maturation time increased, which may have resulted from the degradation of fat by lipases or proteins by proteases.
Figure 3Confocal laser scanning microscopic images of maturing cheese at 1, 30, and 60 d, and the proposed microstructure model. FFC = full-fat Cheddar cheese; RFC = reduced-fat Cheddar cheese; RFC+M = RFC with whey microprotein gels; RFC+M (Ant) = RFC with anthocyanin-whey microprotein gels. The green areas represent protein and the red areas represent fat globules. Orange and green spots highlighted by white arrows represent whey protein microgels and anthocyanin-whey protein microgels, respectively, added to reduced-fat cheese.
). Casein molecules are cross-linked to form a porous network structure. Fat, water, and minerals occupy the pores and play a supporting role in the network structure of cheese; fat has a great influence on the structure of cheese. Casein in RFC has a denser network structure and a harder texture. We observed that WPM and WPM (Ant) can act as fat-globule substitutes in the RFC casein matrix (Figure 3). The observed cheese-mechanical behavior shows that substitution of fat by WPM and WPM (Ant) can reduce the hardness of RFC. In addition, the size of the fat globules and the interaction of fat globules or free fatty acids with the casein matrix may play a major role in cheese properties (
). Therefore, controlling the particle size of fat substitutes is important for improving the quality defects of reduced-fat cheese, which has potential value in the development of reduced-fat dairy products. Overall, in this study, WPM and WPM (Ant) with a particle size of about 4 μm were able to act as a fat substitute and were distributed relatively evenly in RFC.
Sensory Evaluation
Images of various matured cheeses are shown in Figure 4A. The RFC+M (Ant) had a purple color. The sensory radar graph of the cheeses after maturation for 60 d is presented in Figure 4B. The scorer had high inter- and intra-rater reliability (data not shown). The panelists reported that all cheeses were acceptable and no bitterness was detected. There was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in saltiness and acidity between FFC, RFC, RFC+M, and RFC+M (Ant). Scores for appearance, cheese flavor, color, springiness, creaminess, chewiness, and hardness of RFC+M were higher than those of RFC, but lower compared with RFC+M (Ant) (Figure 4B). It is notable that the addition of WPM (Ant) markedly enhanced the color of RFC; the scores for color and appearance of RFC+M (Ant) were higher than those of FFC, and all panelists scored the color of RFC+M (Ant) as acceptable.
Figure 4(A) Images and (B) sensory evaluation of the cheeses after 60 d of ripening. FFC = full-fat Cheddar cheese; RFC = reduced-fat Cheddar cheese; RFC+M = RFC with whey protein microgels; RFC+M (Ant) = RFC with anthocyanin-whey protein microgels.
Sensory evaluation showed that the addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) improved the texture of RFC, including its hardness, chewiness, and springiness. The higher fat content of FFC resulted in a stronger flavor and higher creaminess than RFC, RFC+ M, and RFC+M (Ant). Consumer acceptance of cheese is influenced by its appearance, texture, and flavor, which in turn are associated with the composition, structure, and manufacturing process of the cheese (
). The use of fat substitutes should take full account of the effects on the sensory quality of cheese for changing the above factors.
It appears that WPM (Ant) played multiple roles as a fat substitute, texture modifier, and anthocyanin carrier in the improvement of RFC, reducing its hardness and improving its color. These quality improvements were all related to changes in cheese microstructure. Reducing the fat content makes the protein matrix more compact, while reducing the water activity and enzyme activity in the cheese matrix reduces the production of flavor compounds during the maturation process and affects the sensory properties of RFC (
). The addition of WPM increased the moisture content of RFC; more moisture can act as a lubricant and reduces the hardness of the cheese. In addition, WPM occupied pores in the casein network structure, making the microstructure of RFC more flexible and increasing the fluidity and meltability during heating. During maturation, the fat and protein in the cheese were degraded by enzymes, modifying the interaction between WPM and the casein matrix and changing the microstructure, further affecting the rheology and sensory properties of RFC.
CONCLUSIONS
This study investigated the effect of adding WPM or WPM (Ant) on the composition, color, mechanical behavior, rheological properties, microstructure, and sensory attributes of RFC. Whey protein microgels, with and without anthocyanins, of 4 μm diameter (the same as milk fat globules) were selected as a substitution for milk fat globules in the cheese casein matrix. They appeared to be readily accommodated in the matrix and increased both the moisture content and MNFS of RFC. The addition of WPM and WPM (Ant) improved the mechanical properties of hardness, springiness, and chewiness of RFC, as well as increasing the lightness and blue-yellow values of RFC. Notably, the addition of WPM (Ant) shifted the red-green value of the RFC into the positive region, and the overall sensory evaluation scores of RFC+M (Ant) were higher than that of RFC with WPM in the color and mechanical aspects. Overall, the use of WPM and WPM (Ant) with controlled particle size may be a promising strategy for mimicking fat globules and improving consumer acceptance of reduced-fat foods. Moreover, the addition of anthocyanins has potential for improving the functional and color perceptions of reduced-fat foods to satisfy consumer demand for innovative foods.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Financial support from the FUXI talents program (Gaufx-02Y01) from Gansu Agricultural University (Lanzhou, China), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 31772014, 31972202; Beijing), the Beijing Nova Program (No. Z181100006218071; Beijing, China), and Key R&D and transformation projects of science and technology of Qinghai Province (2018-SF-C29; Qinghai, China) are gratefully acknowledged. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Use of microparticulated whey protein concentrate, exopolysaccharide-producing Streptococcus thermophilus, and adjunct cultures for making low-fat Italian Caciotta-type cheese.
Sodium reduction and flavor enhancer addition in probiotic prato cheese: Contributions of quantitative descriptive analysis and temporal dominance of sensations for sensory profiling.
The effect of fat replacement by inulin on the physicochemical properties and microstructure of acid casein processed cheese analogues with added whey protein polymers.