If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
We evaluated the effects of propylene glycol (PG) on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methanogenesis, and microbial community structure. A completely randomized design was conducted in the in vitro incubation, and 4 culture PG dose levels (0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5 μL/g of dry matter) were used in the trial. Based on the fermentation results, the control group (0 μL/g of dry matter, CON) and the second treatment group (15.0 μL/g of dry matter, TRT) were chosen for further analysis to explore the effects of PG on the bacterial and archaeal community structure. The concentrations of propanol, propanal, and succinate increased linearly, whereas the concentration of l-lactate decreased linearly as PG doses increased. The molar proportion of propionate demonstrated a linear increase with increasing PG doses. In contrast with propionate, the molar proportion of acetate and butyrate, and acetate-to-propionate ratio decreased linearly with increasing PG doses. The addition of PG markedly decreased methane production without negative effects on nutrient degradability. In the archaeal level, the relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter tended to decrease, but that of Methanomassiliicoccus significantly increased in TRT group. At the bacterial level, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and Prevotella in TRT group was numerically higher than that in CON group. The analysis of the Negativicutes class showed that the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum tended to increase, whereas that of Selenomonas tended to decrease in TRT group. These results demonstrated that PG might be used as an inhibitor to mitigate methane emission. However, the small decrease in methane production will limit the application of PG as a methane inhibitor in production practices. Further research is needed to determine whether use together with other inhibitors may improve the effects of PG on the utilization of reducing equivalents ([H]) and methane production.
Propylene glycol (PG) has served as a glucogenic precursor in the early lactation of dairy cows to diminish the negative energy balance and treat ketosis since 1954 (
). It efficiently treats ketosis by decreasing blood concentrations of free fatty acids and BHB, and PG was more effective to produce propionate and increase plasma glucose concentration than other precursors, such as glycerol (
In vitro ruminal fermentation of glycerol, propylene glycol and molasses combined with forages and their effect on glucose and insulin blood plasma concentrations after an oral drench in sheep.
suggested that PG was mainly absorbed intact and rarely fermented into propionate in the rumen, based on a study with a single cow. However, in vitro incubation studies indicated that apart from propionate, propanal, and propanol were also important products or intermediates during PG fermentation (
confirmed that the hepatic extraction of PG was relatively low, and PG was extensively fermented into volatile components, such as propanal and propanol, but not propionate. These observations indicated that ruminal fermentation was of considerable importance in cattle, and rumen microbiota were responsible for the majority of PG metabolism in cattle.
Methanogenesis in the rumen results in a significant influence on greenhouse gas emission and represents a direct energy loss of 2 to 12% for animals with different feedstuffs (
). Redirecting reducing equivalents ([H]) from methane (CH4) toward other electron sinks that are nutritional to animals is an excellent CH4 mitigation strategy, which not only decreases the loss of digestible energy but also avoids fermentation inhibition (
). Propanal is the intermediate during PG fermentation, and it will serve either as an electron donor oxidized to propionate or as an electron acceptor reduced to propanol (
suggested that a larger proportion of propanal might be metabolized to propanol and thereby used as an electron sink in the rumen, based on an in vivo study. Propanol has been confirmed to be an important product during PG fermentation (
), and propanol taken up by the rumen wall is oxidized to propionate in the liver; this endogenously produced propionate is further available for gluconeogenesis (
). Although numerous PG studies have been conducted in dairy cows, only a few studies have reported the effects of PG on methanogenesis, and no studies have measured changes in the structure of microbial community in response to the addition of PG in the diet of dairy cows.
reported the contradictory results that PG has no beneficial effects in mitigating sheep CH emission. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to explore the effects of PG on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methanogenesis, and to focus on changes in the bacterial and archaeal community structure by high-throughput sequencing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Treatment and Incubation
The experimental procedures were approved by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Animal Care and Use Committee (Beijing, China). Rumen fluid was sampled 2 h before feeding from 3 cannulated lactating Holstein cows fed a TMR. The chemical composition of TMR was shown in Supplemental Table S1 (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13487151.v1). Ruminal fluid was filtered through 4 layers of cheesecloth under continuous flushing with CO2 and was brought to the laboratory within 30 min. Equal volumes of ruminal fluid from different donor cows were mixed as the inoculum and then diluted with buffer solution (1:2 vol/vol), which was formulated as described by
. A completely randomized design was conducted in the in vitro incubation, and 4 culture PG dose levels (0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5 μL/g of DM) were used in the trial. In the present study, 120-mL serum bottles were used as incubation vessels. Each incubation vessel contained 0.5 g of fermentation substrate with 0, 3.75, 7.50, or 11.25 μL of PG and 75 mL of inoculum-buffer mixed fluid. All incubation vessels were swirled gently by hand to mix the substrate and liquid. Then vessels were flushed with CO2 and sealed with butyl rubber stoppers connected to vacuumed airbags to collect gases during incubation. The concentrations of PG in the in vitro cultures at the beginning of the experiment were 0, 0.68, 1.36, and 2.04 mmol/L, respectively. All cultures were incubated at 39°C for 24 h with horizontal shaking at 60 rpm. The fermentation substrate was the same as the TMR fed to donor cows, which was dried at 55°C for 48 h and ground through a 1-mm screen using a Wiley mill (Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA). The PG (>99.5% wt/wt with density of 1.036 g/mL) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The in vitro incubation was carried out in 3 runs, and 3 replicates per treatment were used in each run. In addition, an extra 3 blank replicates (inoculum-buffer mixed fluid only) without substrate were used to correct the analytes and gases. Each run was carried out one after another.
Sample Collection and Analysis
The incubation of cultures was stopped at 24 h, and all vessels were placed in an ice bath to terminate the incubation. Calibrated glass syringes (100 mL, Häberle Labortechnik, Lonsee-Ettlenschieß, Germany) were used to measure the total gas production of each airbag. The pH of all vessels was measured via the Seven Go portable pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland). The preweighed nylon bags (8 × 12 cm, 42 μm) were used to filter the whole biomass material of each bottle. The filtrate samples were collected to determine fermentation products and microbial analysis. The samples for determining fermentation products were frozen at −20°C, and the samples for microbial analysis were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80°C. Cold running water was used to wash the nylon bags until the effluent was clear. Afterward, the nylon bags were dried at 55°C for 48 h before analysis of the apparent disappearance of DM, NDF, and ADF. The contents of NDF and ADF were measured using the fiber analyzer (A200, Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY) according to the method described by
. Sodium sulfite and α-amylase were used for the analysis of NDF. The concentrations of CH4 and H2 in each airbag were determined using the Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) fitted with a packed column (1 m × 2 mm × 3.175 mm; Porapak Q, Agilent Technologies) and a thermal conductivity detector. The VFA concentrations were measured by the Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies) equipped with a capillary column (30 m × 0.250 mm × 0.25 μm; BD-FFAP, Agilent Technologies) and a flame ionization detector. The detailed methods of determining gases and VFA were conducted as described by
Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro.
. The l-lactate was determined using a kit purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) and based on the method of lactate dehydrogenase. Succinate was measured using a succinate colorimetric assay kit purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
DNA Extraction and Bacterial and Archaeal 16S rRNA Genes Sequencing and Analysis
Total DNA was extracted using an EZNA Mag-Bind Soil DNA kit (Omega, Norcross, GA), and the quality and concentration of microbial DNA were evaluated by using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and a Qubit 3.0 spectrometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), respectively.
suggested that kit-based methods were usually poor for extracting representative DNA from rumen fluid samples. The average concentration of extracted DNA in the present study was 48.2 ng/μL, which was sufficient for further analysis following the technician's suggestion. The primers 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) were selected for bacterial community analysis (
). The abundance of the archaeal community was much lower than that of the bacterial community, so the archaeal community was analyzed using nested PCR. The process of nested PCR was conducted using the primers Arch340F (5′-CCCTAYGGGGYGCASCAG-3′)/Arch1000R (5′-GAGARGWRGTGCATGGCC-3′) and Arch349F (5′-GYGCASCAGKCGMGAAW-3′)/Arch806R (50-GGACTACVSGGGTATCTAAT-3′), as previously described by
Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro.
. Finally, the purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar ratios and subjected to pair-end sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 300 bp). In the present study, only 2 dose levels (0 and 15.0 μL/g of DM) were chosen for microbial analysis.
Sequencing reads were assigned to different samples based on their unique barcode. Paired-reads from the original DNA fragments were merged by FLASH (
). The taxonomic classification of the sequences was carried out using the RDP classifier at the bootstrap cutoff of 80%. Bacterial sequences were aligned with the SILVA (version 138) database and archaeal sequences were aligned with RDP database (version 11.5) at the confidence threshold of 70%. The α diversity indices were calculated by using the QIIME 2 software package. The bioinformatics software STAMP (https://beikolab.cs.dal.ca/software/STAMP) was used to visualize the relative abundance difference of bacteria and archaea by extended error bar plot (
). All the raw sequences were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/), under accession number SRP198193.
Statistical Analysis
All data were checked to ensure normal distribution, and some data were transformed to log10(n+1) if necessary. The in vitro fermentation variables, the apparent disappearance of nutrient, and α diversity index of bacteria and archaea were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) as shown in the following model:
Yijk = μ + Ai + Bj + ABij + eijk,
where Yijk is the dependent variable, μ is the overall mean, Ai is the effect of treatment (considered fixed), Bj is the effect of run (j = 1, 2, 3, considered fixed), ABij is the interaction between Ai and Bj (considered fixed), and eijk is the residual. Polynomial contrasts were used to test the linear and quadratic effects of treatments. The fixed effect of run and the interaction of treatment and run that were not significant were dropped from the model, and the reduced model run again. Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05, and a tendency of difference was declared at 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
RESULTS
Data on pH, nutrient degradability, products of fermentation, the proportion of VFA, and CH4 and H2 production are presented in Table 1. Based on the previous study that PG was metabolized after 24 h in ruminal cultures in vitro, we terminated the incubation process at 24 h (
). The concentrations of propanol, propanal, and succinate increased linearly (P < 0.01), whereas the concentration of l-lactate decreased linearly as PG doses increased (P < 0.01). The molar proportion of propionate demonstrated a linear (P < 0.01) increase with increasing PG doses. In contrast with propionate, the molar proportion of acetate and butyrate and the acetate-to-propionate ratio demonstrated a linear (P < 0.01, P = 0.019, and P < 0.01) decrease with increasing PG doses. Methane production was linearly decreased (P = 0.045), whereas H2 detected in the gas phase was unaffected when the fermentation substrate was supplemented with increasing dose levels of PG. The apparent disappearance of DM, NDF, ADF, and pH were not significantly affected in response to the addition of PG.
Table 1The in vitro fermentation pH, nutrient digestibility, products of fermentation, the proportion of VFA, and gas production for fermenters used a control fermentation substrate with increasing dose levels of propylene glycol (PG; n = 9)
DMD = apparent disappearance of DM; NDFD = apparent disappearance of NDF; ADFD = apparent disappearance of ADF; gH2 = hydrogen detected in the gas phase.
Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
0.049
0.045
0.438
a–d Means within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
1 DMD = apparent disappearance of DM; NDFD = apparent disappearance of NDF; ADFD = apparent disappearance of ADF; gH2 = hydrogen detected in the gas phase.
2 Data were analyzed using PG dose levels of 0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5 μL/g DM.
Changes of Microbial Community Structure in Response to PG
Based on the results of ruminal fermentation characteristics and gas production (Table 1), the molar proportion of acetate, propionate, acetate-to-propionate ratio, and CH4 production in the second treatment group (15.0 μL/g of DM) was significantly (P < 0.05) different from that in the control group (0 μL/g of DM), but was similar to that in the third treatment group (22.5 μL/g of DM). In the present study, the PG dose level in the second treatment group (15.0 μL/g of DM) was the best dose to affect ruminal fermentation in vitro. Therefore, the control group (0 μL/g of DM, CON) and the second treatment group (15.0 μL/g of DM, TRT) were chosen for further analysis to explore the effects of PG on the bacterial and archaeal community structure by high-throughput sequencing.
Bacteria
At the bacterial phylum level, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were the dominant phyla, representing 51.52 and 27.23% of the total sequences, respectively. Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Patescibacteria, and Verrucomicrobia represented average percentages of 13.26, 3.37, 1.56, and 1.29%, respectively (Supplemental Figure S1, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13487151.v1). At the bacterial genus level, the 10 predominant genera were Prevotella (23.02%), Rikennellaceae_RC9_gut_group (11.66%), Ruminobacter (11.14%), Christensenellaceae_R-7_group (3.3%), Olsenella (3.17%), Pseudobutyrivibrio (2.51%), Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 (2.48%), NK4A214_group (2.36%), Succiniclasticum (1.74%), and Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-002 (1.27%; Supplemental Figure S2, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13487151.v1). The relative abundance of most phyla and genera was not significantly affected when the fermentation substrate was supplemented with PG. The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes in TRT group was numerically higher than that in CON group (52.45 vs. 50.58%, P = 0.471; Figure 1). The relative abundance of Prevotella in TRT group was numerically higher than that in CON group (25.17 vs. 21.06%, P = 0.269; Figure 2). To further study changes in the bacterial community structure, differences in the relative abundance of individual OTU belonging to Prevotella were tested using the bioinformatics software (STAMP). The relative abundance of 2 dominant OTU belonging to Prevotella in TRT group was numerically higher than that in CON group. The relative abundance of OTU1314 belonging to Prevotella in TRT group significantly increased (P = 0.034) in response to the addition of PG (Figure 3a). The Negativicutes class of Firmicutes was found to be correlated with propionate formation from carbohydrates (
). Differences in the relative abundance of genera belonging to Negativicutes class were tested using the bioinformatics software (STAMP). In Negativicutes class, the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum tended to increase (P = 0.052), whereas that of Selenomonas tended to decrease (P = 0.085) after PG supplementation (Figure 3b). Alpha diversity indices of the bacterial community were presented in Table 2. No significant differences were observed between treatments based on the α diversity indices of coverage, Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson, showing that the bacterial community richness and diversity were not affected by the addition of PG.
Figure 1Differences in the relative abundance of the predominant bacterial phyla. The propylene glycol dose for the control group (CON) was 0 μL/g of DM; the second treatment group (TRT) was 15.0 μL/g of DM.
Figure 2Differences in the relative abundance of the predominant bacterial genera. The propylene glycol dose for the control group (CON) was 0 μL/g of DM; the second treatment group (TRT) was 15.0 μL/g of DM.
Figure 3Changes in specific bacterial community structure. (a) The difference in the relative abundance of operational taxonomic units (OTU) in Prevotella. (b) The difference in the relative abundance of genera in the Negativicutes class. The propylene glycol dose for the control group (CON) was 0 μL/g of DM; the second treatment group (TRT) was 15.0 μL/g of DM.
At the archaeal phylum level, Euryarchaeota was the dominant phylum, representing nearly100% of the total sequences. At the archaeal genus level, Methanomassiliicoccus (67.15%), Methanobrevibacter (29.90%), norank_f__Methanobacteriaceae (1.35%), Methanomicrobium (0.91%), and Methanosphaera (0.53%; Supplemental Figure S3, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13487151.v1) were the 5 predominant genera. The relative abundance of Methanomassiliicoccus significantly increased (P = 0.044), whereas that of Methanobrevibacter tended to decrease (P = 0.072), and that of Methanosphaera significantly decreased (P = 0.011) after PG supplementation (Figure 4). Alpha diversity indices of the archaeal community were presented in Table 2. The α diversity indices of Chao1 (P = 0.018) and ACE (P = 0.007) were significantly decreased in response to the addition of PG, showing that PG changed the archaeal community richness. The α diversity index of Simpson was significantly increased (P = 0.023), and Shannon index tended to decrease (P = 0.067) in TRT, indicating the PG affected the diversity of archaeal community.
Figure 4Differences in the relative abundance of the predominant archaeal genera. The propylene glycol dose for the control group (CON) was 0 μL/g of DM; the second treatment group (TRT) was 15.0 μL/g of DM.
). Propylene glycol has a significant effect on rumen fermentation pattern, causing an increase in the molar proportion of propionate and a decrease in the acetate/propionate molar ratio. Numerous studies have shown significant higher proportion of propionate in the rumen in response to the use of PG (
Propylene glycol for dairy cows: A review of the metabolism of propylene glycol and its effects on physiological parameters, feed intake, milk production and risk of ketosis.
In vitro ruminal fermentation of glycerol, propylene glycol and molasses combined with forages and their effect on glucose and insulin blood plasma concentrations after an oral drench in sheep.
have reported that the addition of PG increased the proportion of propionate and decreased butyrate in ruminal cultures in vitro, which was similar to our results.
Effect of forage conservation method, concentrate level and propylene glycol on diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, blood metabolite concentrations and nutrient utilisation of dairy cows.
have found no change in the proportion of butyrate in the rumen response to the use of PG. Different dietary components used in different studies may be responsible for the different VFA results. The observed similarity in pH among treatments was consistent with the observed similarity in total VFA concentrations among treatments in the present study. The formation of propionate is one of the important [H] disposal pathways in the rumen, and the increase in ruminal propionate proportion is stoichiometrically associated with a reduction in methanogenesis. The formation of acetate and butyrate results in more [H] production, whereas propionate formation is an alternative pathway for [H] use in the rumen, accompanied by a decline in CH4 production (
, inhibition of rumen methanogenesis resulted from 3-nitrooxypropanol increased the hydrogen emission and did not change the molar proportion of propionate, suggesting a possible redirection of [H] to alternative metabolic pathways.
reported that inhibition of methanogenesis led to the redirection of [H] toward propionate and H2 rather than butyrate, and a substantial proportion of the reducing equivalents were still unaccounted for in other fermentation products. There are 3 known pathways for propionate production: succinate pathway, acrylate pathway, and PG pathway. During the formation of propionate, the succinate pathway and acrylate pathway could provide alternative electron sinks to competitively inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen. Strictly speaking, the PG pathway could not provide alternative electron sinks to compete [H] with methanogenesis in the rumen. However, as an intermediate during PG fermentation, propanal can be used as an electron sink, and it will be either an electron donor oxidized to propionate or an electron acceptor reduced to propanol.
suggested that a larger fraction of propanal might be diverted to propanol and used as an electron sink in the rumen. Similarly, the observed net sums of propanol and propanal for each treatment (0.53, 1.00, and 1.76 mM) in the present study were very close to the concentrations of PG added for each level of treatment (0.68, 1.36, and 2.04 mM), which suggested that most PG was metabolized to these 2 compounds, leaving just a little PG for conversion to propionate. Perhaps the fact that most of the PG ended up in propanol plus propanal explained why the total VFA concentration did not significantly differ among treatments. In the present study, CH4 production significantly decreased in TRT group, but a small decrease of 13.14% made it an imperfect inhibitor of CH4 production. In agreement with our results,
reported that PG can successfully compete with the methanogenesis pathway for [H] and resulted in small but consistent inhibition of CH4 production. In the present study, the fermentation of PG produced more propanol and less propionate, which means that more of the intermediate product propanal could be used as an electron acceptor to competitively inhibit methanogenesis. This should be one reason that a small decrease in CH4 production was observed in the present study when the fermentation substrate was supplemented with PG. In addition, the significant increase of succinate concentration and the significant decrease of l-lactate concentration were observed in the present study. These results indicated that the change of fermentation pattern resulting from PG metabolism affected the other 2 propionate production pathways. The enhanced succinate pathway could provide alternative electron sinks to competitively inhibit methanogenesis. This should be another reason that the addition of PG in fermentation substrate decreased the CH4 production. In fact, compared with the control group, the extra propionate production for each treatment (0.70, 1.56, and 2.34 mM) was more than that from the maximum PG conversion for each level of treatment (0.15, 0.36, and 0.28 mM). Consistent with our results, a decrease of l-lactate concentration was also observed in the PG study conducted by
reported that the dissimilation of PG by rumen microbes resulted in an increased intake of hydrogen, and [H] appeared to be better utilized than gaseous hydrogen.
Many microbial species belonging to the Firmicutes are good H2 producers, such as Ruminococcus and Eubacterium. In contrast, Bacteroidetes were commonly considered to be net H2 utilizers (
reported that chitosan decreased the CH4 production and increased the proportion of propionate in ruminal cultures in vitro, partly achieved by substitution of Firmicutes by Bacteroidetes.
Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro.
also reported that a modified dietary formulation strategy trended to decrease the CH4 production and increased the proportion of propionate by substitution of Firmicutes by Bacteroidetes. Prevotella spp. are usually considered as the main bacterial genus represented in the rumen, with many different species observed (
Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.
). Prevotella species produced different fermentation end products due to the different enzymes produced by different species. Prevotella albensis produced acetate, but some of Prevotella species produced propionate as the fermentation end product, including Prevotella brevis, Prevotella bryantii and Prevotella ruminicola (
). In the present study, comparison at genus level of Prevotella did not reveal a significant difference between CON group and TRT group. To find an explanation for the difference in CH4 production in the present study, the bacterial composition of Prevotella genus and the Negativicutes class was examined more in detail. The analysis of Prevotella genus showed that the relative abundance of predominant OTU belonging to Prevotella was higher in TRT group, but not significantly increased. These predominant OTU belonging to Prevotella in the present study may be correlated with the propionate formation.
Species in the Negativicutes class have been proved to participate in the propionate formation by the acrylate pathway or the succinate pathway (
). The analysis of Negativicutes class showed that the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum tended to increase, whereas that of Selenomonas tended to decrease in TRT group. The same changes of the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum and Selenomonas with our study were observed in a similar study that explored the effect of calcium propionate on rumen microbiota (
), so its high relative abundance in the rumen generally indicated the large production of succinate. And the high relative abundance of Succiniclasticum was commonly observed in dairy cows fed high levels of concentrate or corn (
Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge.
), so its relative abundance in the rumen was generally related to the production of lactate. A previous study reported that Selenomonas ruminantium alone fermented lactate to propionate, acetate, and CO2, but coculture with methanogen caused a significant decrease in the production of propionate and an increase in acetate formed from lactate (
). The changes of the relative abundance of Succiniclasticum and Selenomonas in the present study further confirmed that the change of fermentation pattern resulting from PG metabolism affected the other 2 propionate production pathways, and the enhanced succinate pathway could provide alternative electron sinks to competitively inhibit methanogenesis.
Methanogenic archaea most commonly use H2 and CO2 as substrates for methanogenesis, but some species can also metabolize formate, methanol, or acetate to produce CH4. Hydrogenotrophic pathway and methylotrophic pathway are commonly considered as the 2 major pathways of methanogenesis in the rumen. The genus Methanobrevibacter is considered to be the most common hydrogenotrophic archaea, which produces 1 mole of CH4 for each mole of CO2 by hydrogenotrophic pathway (
). Methanobrevibacter is commonly the predominant protozoa-associated methanogens, which can encode a kind of sugar protein to attach on the surface of protozoa (
. The relationship between Methanomassiliicoccus and protozoa has not been reported in published literatures. Comparisons of the pathways for CH4 formation by Methanobrevibacter and Methanomassiliicoccus indicated that Methanobrevibacter might be more effective than Methanomassiliicoccus in methanogenesis. In our previous study, we also found that nonforage fiber sources would mitigate CH4 emission by decreasing the relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter and increasing that of Methanomassiliicoccus at the archaea level (
Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro.
). In the present study, the addition of PG in fermentation substrate may reduce CH4 production by changing the structure of archaeal community, increasing the relative abundance of Methanomassiliicoccus and decreasing that of Methanobrevibacter.
CONCLUSIONS
In the present study, we showed that the fermentation of PG produced more propanol and less propionate, which meant that more of the intermediate product propanal could be used as an electron acceptor to competitively inhibit methanogenesis. In addition, the change of fermentation pattern resulting from PG metabolism affected the other 2 propionate production pathways, and the enhanced succinate pathway could provide alternative electron sinks to competitively inhibit methanogenesis. A small decrease (13.14%) in CH4 production was observed in the present study when the fermentation substrate was supplemented with PG. Changes in the bacterial and archaeal community structure may be responsible for these results. Propylene glycol may not be a perfect inhibitor of CH4 production. However, if the methanogenesis pathway is inhibited by some other inhibitors, the use of PG might be beneficial by improving the utilization of [H] associated with inhibition.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (Grant No. 2016YFD0500507, 2016YFD0700205, 2016YFD0700201). The authors have not stated any conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
Belanche A.
de la Fuente G.
Newbold C.J.
Study of methanogen communities associated with different rumen protozoal populations.
In vitro ruminal fermentation of glycerol, propylene glycol and molasses combined with forages and their effect on glucose and insulin blood plasma concentrations after an oral drench in sheep.
Propylene glycol for dairy cows: A review of the metabolism of propylene glycol and its effects on physiological parameters, feed intake, milk production and risk of ketosis.
Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge.
Effect of forage conservation method, concentrate level and propylene glycol on diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, blood metabolite concentrations and nutrient utilisation of dairy cows.
Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.
Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro.