Advertisement
Research| Volume 106, ISSUE 3, P1773-1789, March 2023

Feeding lower-protein diets based on red clover and grass or alfalfa and corn silage does not affect milk production but improves nitrogen use efficiency in dairy cows

Open AccessPublished:January 27, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22607

      ABSTRACT

      Reducing the dietary crude protein (CP) concentration can decrease the financial cost and lower the environmental impact of milk production. Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of reducing the dietary CP concentration on animal performance, nutrient digestibility, milk fatty acid (FA) profile, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE; milk N/N intake) in dairy cows fed legume silage-based diets. Thirty-six multiparous Holstein-Friesian dairy cows that were 76 ± 14 (mean ± SD) days in milk and 698 ± 54 kg body weight were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square design in each of 2 studies, with 3 periods of 28 d. In study 1, cows were fed diets based on a 50:50 ratio of red clover to grass silage [dry matter (DM) basis] containing 1 of 3 dietary CP concentrations: high (H) = 175 g of CP/kg of DM; medium (M) = 165 g of CP/kg of DM; or low (L) = 150 g of CP/kg of DM. In study 2, cows were fed 175 g of CP/kg of DM with a 50:50 ratio of alfalfa to corn silage (H50) or 1 of 2 diets containing 150 g of CP/kg of DM with either a 50:50 (L50) or a 60:40 (L60) ratio of alfalfa to corn silage. Cows in both studies were fed a total mixed ration with a forage-to-concentrate ratio of 52:48 (DM basis). All diets were formulated to meet the MP requirements, except L (95% of MP requirements). In study 1, cows fed L ate 1.6 kg of DM/d less than those fed H or M, but milk yield was similar across treatments. Mean milk protein, fat, and lactose concentrations were not affected by diet. However, the apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility was decreased in cows fed L. The NUE was 5.7 percentage units higher in cows fed L than H. Feeding L also decreased milk and plasma urea concentrations by 4.4 mg/dL and 0.78 mmol/L, respectively. We found no effect of dietary treatment on the milk saturated or monounsaturated FA proportion, but the proportion of polyunsaturated FA was increased, and milk odd- and branched-chain FA decreased in cows fed L compared with H. In study 2, DM intake was 2 kg/d lower in cows receiving L50 than H50. Increasing the alfalfa content and feeding a low-CP diet (L60) did not alter DMI but decreased milk yield and milk protein concentration by 2 kg/d and 0.6 g/kg, respectively, compared with H50. Likewise, milk protein and lactose yield were decreased by 0.08 kg/d in cows receiving L60 versus H50. Diet had no effect on apparent nutrient digestibility. Feeding the low-CP diets compared with H50 increased the apparent NUE by approximately 5 percentage units and decreased milk and plasma urea concentrations by 7.2 mg/dL and 1.43 mmol/L, respectively. Dietary treatment did not alter milk FA profile except cis-9,trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid, which was higher in milk from cows receiving L60 compared with H50. We concluded that reducing CP concentration to around 150 g/kg of DM in red clover and grass or alfalfa and corn silage-based diets increases the apparent NUE and has little effect on nutrient digestibility or milk performance in dairy cows.

      Graphical abstract

      Key words

      INTRODUCTION

      The increasing global price of soybean meal in association with tighter regulations on the disposal of slurry and manure, and greater public scrutiny of the sustainability of dairy farming, has led to renewed interest in alternative strategies for feeding protein to dairy cows (
      • Lavery A.
      • Ferris C.P.
      Proxy measures and novel strategies for estimating nitrogen utilisation efficiency in dairy cattle.
      ). Two obvious approaches are to increase the use of high-protein homegrown forage legumes and to reduce protein concentrations in the diet of dairy cows (
      • Sinclair K.D.
      • Garnsworthy P.C.
      • Mann G.E.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Reducing dietary protein in dairy cow diets: Implications for nitrogen utilization, milk production, welfare and fertility.
      ).
      Alfalfa and red clover are the most popular forage legumes grown globally and are common in dairy cattle diets in North America and northern and western Europe (
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Ellis N.M.
      • Davies D.R.
      Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and corn silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
      ). Both alfalfa and red clover silages contain CP levels of approximately 180 to 200 g/kg of DM under typical management conditions. In comparison, grass silage ranges from 100 to 160 and corn silage from 70 to 90 g of CP/kg of DM (
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      • Davies L.J.
      • Kim E.J.
      Effects of mixtures of red clover and maize silages on the partitioning of dietary nitrogen between milk and urine by dairy cows.
      ;
      • Tayyab U.
      • Wilkinson R.G.
      • Charlton G.L.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Grass silage particle size when fed with or without maize silage alters performance, reticular pH and metabolism of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      ;
      • Johnston D.J.
      • Laidlaw A.S.
      • Theodoridou K.
      • Ferris C.P.
      Performance and nutrient utilisation of dairy cows offered silages produced from three successive harvests of either a red clover–perennial ryegrass sward or a perennial ryegrass sward.
      ). Alfalfa and red clover can be grown in a range of soil types and weather conditions, and produce high DM yields without artificial N fertilizer input (
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      • Evans R.T.
      • Scollan N.D.
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Merry R.J.
      • Wilkins R.J.
      Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function.
      ). Several studies have reported that the inclusion of up to 66% red clover or alfalfa silage in the forage component of dairy cow diets improved DMI, milk yield, and the content of PUFA in milk (
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Lee M.R.F.
      • Davies D.R.
      • Kim E.J.
      • Nute G.R.
      • Ellis N.M.
      • Scollan N.D.
      Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and grass silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
      ;
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      Milk production from silage: Comparison of grass, legume and maize silages and their mixtures.
      ;
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      ). The use of red clover compared with grass silage has also been reported to increase the efficiency of microbial protein (MCP) synthesis in the rumen and improve the omasal flow of AA (
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Lee M.R.F.
      • Davies D.R.
      • Kim E.J.
      • Nute G.R.
      • Ellis N.M.
      • Scollan N.D.
      Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and grass silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
      ,
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Ellis N.M.
      • Davies D.R.
      Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and corn silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
      ), except for methionine, which was lower in cows fed red clover compared with grass silage (
      • Lee M.R.F.
      • Theobald V.J.
      • Tweed J.K.S.
      • Winters A.L.
      • Scollan N.D.
      Effect of feeding fresh or conditioned red clover on milk fatty acids and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
      ). However, higher inclusion rates of alfalfa silage of up to 75% have been shown to have a negative effect on milk production (
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      ;
      • Thomson A.L.
      • Humphries D.J.
      • Jones A.K.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      The effect of varying proportion and chop length of lucerne silage in a maize silage-based total mixed ration on diet digestibility and milk yield in dairy cattle.
      ).
      Feeding diets that are high in CP (>175 g CP/kg DM) can improve the supply of MP to the intestine, but high-CP diets typically result in low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE; milk N/N intake), with increased RDP leading to the production of excess ammonia in the rumen (
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Heyler K.
      • Schurman E.
      • Griswold K.
      • Topper P.
      • Hile M.
      • Ishler V.
      • Fabian-Wheeler E.
      • Dinh S.
      Case Study: Reducing dietary protein decreased the ammonia emitting potential of manure from commercial dairy farms.
      ). This excess ammonia is absorbed into the blood, where it is converted to urea in the liver and subsequently excreted in the urine (
      • Schwab C.G.
      • Broderick G.A.
      A 100-Year Review: Protein and amino acid nutrition in dairy cows.
      ). Excreted N can subsequently be lost to the environment, contributing to the deterioration of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (
      • Schwab C.G.
      • Broderick G.A.
      A 100-Year Review: Protein and amino acid nutrition in dairy cows.
      ). In contrast, feeding lower-CP diets (<165 g CP/kg DM) has been shown to reduce urinary N excretion by increasing N utilization (
      • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
      • Broderick G.A.
      Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
      ). However, concentrations less than 150 g CP/kg DM may decrease milk production by reducing DMI in high-yielding dairy cows (
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Giallongo F.
      Feeding protein to dairy cows—What should be our target?.
      ;
      • Sinclair K.D.
      • Garnsworthy P.C.
      • Mann G.E.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Reducing dietary protein in dairy cow diets: Implications for nitrogen utilization, milk production, welfare and fertility.
      ).
      Despite the potential negative effects of low-CP diets on intake and performance, it has been reported that the CP concentration in dairy cow diets can be reduced to around 140 to 150 g/kg DM with no negative effects on dairy cow performance, health, or fertility if the diets are formulated appropriately to maximize MCP synthesis and supply sufficient MP (
      • Sinclair K.D.
      • Garnsworthy P.C.
      • Mann G.E.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Reducing dietary protein in dairy cow diets: Implications for nitrogen utilization, milk production, welfare and fertility.
      ). However, the effects of low-CP diets that are based on high inclusion rates of red clover or alfalfa silage are unclear. Most studies that have evaluated the inclusion of legume silages have fed CP concentrations of approximately 170 g/kg DM, and limited knowledge exists on the effects of reducing the dietary protein concentration in legume silage-based diets on milk performance and N utilization, particularly for red clover (
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Ellis N.M.
      • Davies D.R.
      Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and corn silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
      ;
      • Broderick G.A.
      Utilization of protein in red clover and alfalfa silages by lactating dairy cows and growing lambs.
      ;
      • Johansen M.
      • Lund P.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      Feed intake and milk production in dairy cows fed different grass and legume species: A meta-analysis.
      ). Forage legumes contain an excess of RDP, as most of the N is released rapidly in the rumen (
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Hart K.J.
      • Wilkinson R.G.
      • Huntington J.A.
      Effects of inclusion of whole-crop pea silages differing in their tannin content on the performance of dairy cows fed high or low protein concentrates.
      ), even in red clover silages, where the action of the enzyme polyphenol oxidase (PPO) can reduce the degradability of CP (
      • Lee M.R.F.
      Forage polyphenol oxidase and ruminant livestock nutrition.
      ). As a consequence, diets based on forage legume silages can be deficient in digestible undegradable protein or may be imbalanced in AA, which can lead to a reduced milk yield (
      • Westreicher-Kristen E.
      • Blank R.
      • Metges C.C.
      • Susenbeth A.
      Protein value of diets for dairy cows with different proportions of crude protein originating from red clover silage versus soybean meal.
      ).
      We hypothesized that feeding low-protein diets based on legume (red clover or alfalfa) silages or altering the inclusion rate of alfalfa in a low-CP diet of lactating cows would improve NUE without affecting milk performance if the MP supply was maintained. The objective of our 2 studies was to determine the effect of reducing dietary CP concentration in diets based on high-protein forage legumes. The first study (study 1) examined the effects of reducing dietary CP concentration in a red clover and grass silage-based diet on intake, milk performance, diet digestibility, and NUE in dairy cows. The second study (study 2) examined the effects of dietary CP concentration in diets with different proportions of alfalfa and corn silage.

      MATERIALS AND METHODS

      Animals and Housing

      All procedures were performed in accordance with the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (amended 2012) and received local ethical approval (Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, United Kingdom). Study 1 was conducted from October 2018 to January 2019, and study 2 from January to April 2019.
      Study 1 used 18 multiparous lactating dairy cows producing (mean ± SD) 45.3 ± 5.72 kg of milk per day. Cows were 71 ± 14 DIM, with BW 690 ± 48 kg, and BCS 2.6 ± 0.31 (where 1 = emaciated and 5 = obese; scored to 0.25 units;
      • Ferguson J.D.
      • Galligan D.T.
      • Thomsen N.
      Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows.
      ). Study 2 used a separate group of 18 Holstein-Friesian multiparous dairy cows, yielding 46.5 ± 4.78 kg of milk per day. These cows were 81 ± 13 DIM, with a mean BW of 705 ± 59 kg, and BCS of 2.6 ± 0.32. All cows were housed in the same area of an open span building fitted with freestalls and mattresses. Stalls were bedded twice weekly with sawdust and lime, with automatic scrapers that scraped the passageways at 6-h intervals. All cows had constant ad libitum access to fresh drinking water.

      Experimental Design

      Each study was a 3 × 3 Latin square design with 3 periods and 3 dietary treatments. Experimental periods were 28 d in duration, which included a 21-d adaptation to the diets and a 7-d sampling period. Cows were blocked by milk yield recorded in the week before the start of the study and DIM, and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dietary treatments in each study. In study 1, the red clover and grass silage-based diets were formulated to supply 3 different concentrations of dietary CP: 175 (high, H), 165 (medium, M), or 150 (low, L) g CP/kg DM. In study 2, the treatment diets were formulated to contain 175 g CP/kg DM with a 50:50 ratio of alfalfa to corn silage (H50), 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage (L50), or 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage (L60).

      Diets and Feeding

      The animals were fed the diets as a TMR that was formulated to produce an average of 37 kg of milk per day according to
      • Thomas C.
      Feed Into Milk: An Advisory Manual.
      . All diets were formulated to be isoenergetic (ME basis) and to contain a similar MP content, except in study 1, where diet L was predicted to supply 95% of MP requirements. To maintain the MP supply, rumen-protected protein sources (xylose-treated soybean meal and heat-treated rapeseed meal) were used in the formulation of the low-CP diets (Table 1). The forage-to-concentrate ratios in both studies were maintained at 52:48 (DM basis).
      Table 1Dietary ingredients and predicted chemical composition of diets based on red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage, fed to dairy cows in studies 1 and 2
      Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      ItemStudy 1Study 2
      HMLH50L50L60
      Dietary ingredient (g/kg DM)
       Red clover silage2622622620.000.000.00
       Alfalfa silage0.000.000.00262262315
       Grass silage2622622620.000.000.00
       Corn silage0.000.000.00262262210
       Rolled wheat144156173129158163
       Soy hulls144156173129158163
       Molassed sugar beet77.077.077.077.077.077.1
       Soybean meal74.98.30.0095.829.17.3
       SoyPass
      Xylose-treated soybean meal (KW Alternative Feeds).
      0.0041.620.80.0020.837.5
       Rapeseed meal12.54.160.0020.80.000.00
       RapeTec
      Heat-treated rapeseed meal (SC Feeds).
      0.008.38.30.008.34.2
       Rumen-protected fat18.718.718.718.718.718.8
       Minerals and vitamins
      Mineral and vitamin premix (KW Alternative Feeds), providing (g/kg) 220 calcium, 30 phosphorus, 80 magnesium, 80 sodium, (mg/kg) 760 copper, 30 selenium, 1,000,000 IU of vitamin A, 300,000 IU of vitamin D3, 3,000 IU of vitamin E, 2.5 mg/kg vitamin B12, 135 mg/kg biotin.
      5.005.005.005.005.005.00
      Predicted composition
      Predicted composition of diets were calculated using Feed Into Milk (Thomas, 2004). MPE = metabolizable protein-rumen energy limited; MPN = metabolizable protein-rumen nitrogen limited.
      (g/kg DM)
       Forage:concentrate (DM basis)0.520.520.520.520.520.52
       ME (MJ/kg DM)11.911.911.912.011.911.8
       CP175165150175150152
       MPE10410498109104104
       MPE (% of requirements)10010095105100100
       MPN118115106121104104
       MPN (% of requirements)118111102116100100
      1 Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      2 Xylose-treated soybean meal (KW Alternative Feeds).
      3 Heat-treated rapeseed meal (SC Feeds).
      4 Mineral and vitamin premix (KW Alternative Feeds), providing (g/kg) 220 calcium, 30 phosphorus, 80 magnesium, 80 sodium, (mg/kg) 760 copper, 30 selenium, 1,000,000 IU of vitamin A, 300,000 IU of vitamin D3, 3,000 IU of vitamin E, 2.5 mg/kg vitamin B12, 135 mg/kg biotin.
      5 Predicted composition of diets were calculated using Feed Into Milk (
      • Thomas C.
      Feed Into Milk: An Advisory Manual.
      ). MPE = metabolizable protein-rumen energy limited; MPN = metabolizable protein-rumen nitrogen limited.
      In study 1, the red clover was fed 50:50 (DM basis) with grass silage. First cuts of both red clover (Trifolium pratense) and grass silages (Lolium perenne) were mown at a leafy stage on May 23 and June 10, 2018, respectively, wilted for 24 h, harvested with a self-propelled, precision chop forage harvester (John Deere 7840i), and ensiled in separate concrete clamps with an additive (Axphast Gold; Biotal) applied at the rate of 2.0 L/t. In study 2, a primary growth of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) was mown at early bloom, wilted for 36 h, harvested using a self-propelled forage harvester on June 2, 2019, and ensiled in a concrete clamp with an additive added at the rate of 2.0 L/t (Axcool Gold, Biotal). The corn silage was harvested on October 26, 2019, using a self-propelled forage harvester and ensiled in a concrete clamp with an additive (Corncool Gold, Biotal) applied at the rate of 2 L/t. The alfalfa silage was fed 50:50 (DM basis) with corn silage in H50 and L50, and increased to 60:40 in L60, the maximum inclusion rate of alfalfa that still provided the same predicted MP supply.
      In both studies, dietary ingredients were mixed daily for 10 min using a forage mixer (MixMax 10, Hi-Spec Engineering Limited) calibrated to ±1 kg and fed through roughage intake control feed bins (Insentec B.V.), fitted with automatic animal identification and weighing system calibrated to ±0.1 kg, with a cow per feed bin ratio of 1.2. Fresh feed was delivered once daily at approximately 0800 h at the rate of 1.05 of the previously recorded intakes, with intake calculated daily and refusals collected 3 times weekly before feeding.

      Experimental Routine

      Forage samples were collected twice weekly and dried in a forced-air oven at 105°C, and the ratio of the forages was adjusted to the desired value. Fresh forages and TMR were sampled daily during the final week of each period, stored at −20°C, and pooled within period before subsequent analyses. Additional TMR samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, and 24 h after feeding and fresh forage at approximately 1000 h on d 22 to 24 of each period for the determination of particle size (PS) distribution. All TMR and forage samples were separated into 6 fractions using a modified Penn State Particle Separator, as described by
      • Tayyab U.
      • Wilkinson R.G.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Particle size distribution of forages and mixed rations, and their relationship with ration variability and performance of UK dairy herds.
      , by manual shaking (
      • Kononoff P.J.
      • Heinrichs A.J.
      • Lehman H.A.
      The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows.
      ).
      Cows were milked twice daily at approximately 0600 and 1600 h in a 40-point internal rotary parlor (GEA AutoRotor Magnum 40). During the final week of each period, milk yield was recorded at each milking, and 4 samples were collected at 2 consecutive morning and evening milkings for subsequent analyses of milk composition. Body weight and BCS were recorded following the afternoon milking at the start of the first experimental period, and then at the end of periods 1, 2, and 3.
      In studies 1 and 2, fecal grab samples (approximately 350 g/d per cow) were collected during the final week of each study period from 4 representative cows per treatment at 1000 and 1600 h for 5 consecutive days, and stored at −20°C for subsequent analyses. Blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture during the final week of each study period from 4 representative cows per treatment into heparinized and fluoride oxalate tubes (Becton Dickinson and Company) over 2 consecutive days at 0800, 0900, 1100, and 1300 h. The samples were centrifuged at 1,600 × g for 15 min at 4°C to separate the plasma. Plasma derived from heparinized tubes was immediately analyzed for ammonia, with further subsamples stored at −20°C for subsequent analysis of urea and BHB, whereas glucose was analyzed using plasma obtained from fluoride oxalate tubes.

      In Situ Degradability of the Forages

      Three nonlactating Holstein-Friesian cows with a mean BW of 650 ± 28 kg that had previously been fitted with a rumen cannula 10 cm in diameter (Bar Diamond) were housed in a straw-bedded yard and fed a basal ration at maintenance level (
      • Thomas C.
      Feed Into Milk: An Advisory Manual.
      ). The ration contained (g/kg, DM basis) 264 alfalfa silage, 176 corn silage, 354 chopped wheat straw, 86 Spey syrup (Trident, AB Agri Ltd.), 32 rapeseed meal, 32 wheat distillers dark grains, 14 soybean meal, 9 palm kernel meal, 3 molasses, 12 magnesium chloride, 12 dry cow minerals, 4 g/kg Provimi LiFT (a package of vitamins and cofactors), and 2 g/kg DM of Vistacell Ultra (a live yeast; AB Vista). Dietary ingredients were mixed with the same forage mixer as the cows in the performance study, and diet was offered daily at 0800 h through individual feed bins (American Calan). All cows had continuous access to fresh drinking water.
      The in situ degradability of the silages used in both studies was determined following the method reported by
      • Huntington J.A.
      • Givens D.I.
      Studies on in situ degradation of feeds in the rumen: 1. Effect of species, bag mobility and incubation sequence on dry matter disappearance.
      . In situ nylon bags (Sericol) with a pore size of 42 µm were filled with 8 ± 0.1 g of fresh forage and placed in the rumen of each cow in duplicate 30 min after feeding, and recovered after 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, and 96 h. Following ruminal incubation, the bags were immediately placed in cold water to inhibit further microbial degradation and rinsed for 10 min in the cold rinse cycle of an automatic washing machine (model WAK24210GC, Bosch). For each forage, 0-h time points were also determined using samples without ruminal incubation. All bags were then dried for 48 h in a forced-air oven at 60°C, and the duplicates of the same sample dried residues composited within time point and animal and analyzed for total N.

      Chemical Analyses

      Subsamples of forage and TMR were bulked by period and dried for 48 h in a forced-air oven at 60°C and analyzed for DM according to
      • AOAC International
      Official Methods of Analysis.
      ; 934.01, intra-assay CV of 1.18%). Dried feed samples were then ground in a Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific) through a 1.0-mm sieve before analyses for ash (942.05), CP (988.05), and ether extract (920.39), with intra-assay CV of 0.53, 0.80, and 7.52%, respectively (
      • AOAC International
      Official Methods of Analysis.
      ). The acid-insoluble ash content (intra-assay CV of 5.41%) was determined as per the method of
      • Van Keulen J.
      • Young B.A.
      Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies.
      . Acid detergent fiber and NDF were determined as per the method of
      • Van Soest P.J.
      • Robertson J.B.
      • Lewis B.A.
      Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.
      using heat stable α-amylase for NDF analysis (Sigma; intra-assay CV of 1.87 and 1.05% for NDF and ADF, respectively). Forage ammonia-N and pH were determined using fresh samples following the method of
      • MAFF
      The Analysis of Agricultural Materials.
      . Fresh forage samples were also analyzed for their content of lactate, ethanol, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, and butyrate by Sciantec Analytical (Stockbridge Technology Centre, North Yorkshire, UK) using a water extraction technique followed by high-performance liquid and gas-liquid chromatography.
      Milk samples were analyzed for fat, total protein, lactose, and urea by the near-mid-infrared method at National Milk Laboratories (Wolverhampton, UK). Fatty acids in milk were analyzed by extracting milk fat by centrifugation and methylation using sodium methoxide, according to the method of
      • Feng S.
      • Lock A.L.
      • Garnsworthy P.C.
      Technical Note: A rapid lipid separation method for determining fatty acid composition of milk.
      . The FAME of the feed fatty acids (FA) was prepared according to the protocol of
      • Jenkins T.C.
      Technical note: Common analytical errors yielding inaccurate results during analysis of fatty acids in feed and digesta samples.
      . The individual milk and feed FAME was determined by gas-liquid chromatography (Hewlett Packard 6890), fitted with a CP-Sil 88 column (100 m × 0.25-mm i.d. × 0.20-um film, Agilent Technologies) as described by
      • Lock A.L.
      • Teles B.M.
      • Perfield II, J.W.
      • Bauman D.E.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      A conjugated linoleic acid supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating sheep.
      . A mixed reference standard (Sigma-Aldrich) was routinely run, and individual FA calculated.
      Fecal samples were composited by cow and period, and dried in a forced-air oven at 60°C until constant weight. The dried fecal samples were then milled (1 mm) using a Cuisinart electric grinder (SG20U) and analyzed for acid-insoluble ash, total N, NDF, ADF, and ash. Blood plasma samples were analyzed for ammonia BHB, glucose, and urea (Randox Laboratories; kit catalog no. AM 1015, RB 1008, GL 1611, and UR 221, respectively, with intra-assay CV of 9.61, 5.94, 1.08, and 5.12%, respectively) using a Cobas Miras Plus Autoanalyzer (ABX Diagnostics).

      Calculations

      Dry matter intake was calculated from the recorded daily fresh feed intake for each cow and the analyzed DM content of the TMR. Fecal DM output, digested nutrients, and apparent total-tract digestibility coefficients of DM, OM, N, NDF, and ADF were determined using acid-insoluble ash as an internal marker, as per the method of
      • Van Keulen J.
      • Young B.A.
      Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies.
      . The 4% FCM yield was determined by adjusting the milk yield to 40 g of fat per kilogram of milk (4% FCM yield = milk yield × fat %/4), and ECM was computed as (3.14 MJ/kg) = milk yield × [383 × fat (g/kg) × 100 + 242 × protein (g/kg) × 100 + 165.4 × lactose (g/kg) × 100 + 207]/3,140 (
      • Sjaunja L.O.
      • Bævre L.
      • Junkkarinen L.
      • Pedersen J.
      • Setälä J.
      ). Apparent NUE was calculated as milk N/dietary total N intake, with the N secreted in milk determined as total milk protein/6.38. The forage and TMR PS geometric mean (Xm) and standard deviation of Xm were determined using the equations by
      • ASABE
      Method of determining and expressing particle size of chopped forage materials by screening.
      . The physically effective fiber (peNDF) was calculated by multiplying the physical effectiveness factor with the dietary NDF content (
      • Maulfair D.D.
      • Zanton G.I.
      • Fustini M.
      • Heinrichs A.J.
      Effect of feed sorting on chewing behavior, production, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows.
      ).
      The in situ DM and CP degradability data were fitted in Sigmaplot (version 12.0, Jandel Engineering) as described by
      • Ørskov E.R.
      • McDonald I.
      The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.
      :
      p = a + b (1 − exp−ct),


      where p is the disappearance percentage at t time, a is the immediately soluble fraction, b is the potentially degradable fraction, c is the degradation rate (per hour) of b, and t is the incubation period (h). The effective ruminal degradability (ED) was computed using an 8% per hour rumen passage rate (k) as follows:
      ED = a + b [c/(c + k)].


      Statistical Analysis

      Data from each study were analyzed by ANOVA as a row and column design (
      • Mead R.
      • Curnow R.N.
      • Hasted A.M.
      Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology.
      ), using GenStat 18th edition (VSN International Ltd.), with diet and period as fixed effects and cow as random effect. All data were checked for normality using descriptive statistics before running the ANOVA model in GenStat. The model used was
      Yijk = μ + Di + Pj + Ak + Eijk,


      where Yijk and μ represent the dependent variable and total mean, and Di, Pj, Ak, and Eijk as the diet, period, animal, and residual error, respectively. Plasma metabolites and particle fractions were analyzed as repeated-measures ANOVA that included the fixed effect of sampling time in the model, and interactions between diet and sampling time were also assessed. Tukey's test was conducted post hoc to determine treatment means that differed. Results are presented as the least squares means of each treatment and standard error of the mean. Effects were considered significant when P < 0.05, and a tendency was considered when P < 0.10.

      RESULTS

      Forage and Diet Characteristics

      Study 1

      We observed that the red clover silage contained a higher DM content than the grass silage but was lower in NDF and total fat (Table 2). Both forages had CP contents above 160 g/kg DM, with the concentration in the red clover being 11 g/kg DM higher than the grass silage. The lactate and acetate contents of the red clover silage were 26.0 and 16.3 g/kg DM lower, respectively, than the grass silage, and the concentrations of ammonia-N were similar in both forages. Both silages also had a similar long-chain PUFA content, with the content of C18:3 cis-9,cis-12,cis-15 in the grass silage being 3.88 g of FA/kg of DM higher than the red clover silage. The Xm of the PS of the grass silage was higher than the red clover silage. Similarly, the fractions of peNDF>4mm and peNDF>8mm were higher in grass silage than in the red clover silage. The DM, OM, NDF, ADF, and ether extract concentrations of the 3 TMR were similar, whereas the CP concentration was higher in H than M or L (Table 3). The total FA content in H was 1.9 g of FA/kg of DM higher than the other diets. The mean Xm, physical effectiveness factor (pef)>4mm, and peNDF>4mm were similar for all 3 diets, but we found a tendency for an interaction (P = 0.06) between diet and sampling time for pef>8mm (Supplemental Table S1, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21878619,
      • Sinclair L.
      JDS_Supplementary Tables (1).pdf. figshare. Journal contribution.
      ), which was lower at 4 h after the morning feed for diet H, but at 24 h postfeeding was higher in H compared with the other 2 diets.
      Table 2Nutrient composition (g/kg DM), fermentation profile, fatty acid content, and particle size distribution of red clover, grass silage, alfalfa silage, and corn silage fed to dairy cows in studies 1 and 2
      Item
      EE = ether extract.
      Study 1Study 2
      Red clover silageGrass silageAlfalfa silageCorn silage
      DM (g/kg)421320307340
      CP17816718898.2
      OM877892870964
      NDF371510399380
      ADF311309313198
      EE14.935.923.732.5
      Ash12310813035.8
      Fermentation profile (g/kg DM)
       pH4.263.984.223.67
       Ammonia-N (g/kg total N)54.354.766.076.4
       Lactate64.090.010460.6
       Ethanol0.993.741.214.33
       Acetate12.228.523.833.2
       Propionate0.250.750.983.07
       Iso-butyrate0.290.45
       Butyrate0.130.270.160.15
       Acetate:propionate0.120.120.080.03
      Fatty acid (g/kg DM)
       C16:01.862.432.853.26
       C18:00.320.260.360.57
       C18:1 cis-90.280.420.405.76
       C18:2 cis-9,cis-122.012.213.1311.35
       C18:3 cis-9,cis-12,cis-154.087.965.381.06
       Total fatty acids12.017.519.927.3
      Fraction
      Fraction of forages at 0 h postfeeding; Xm = geometric mean particle size; SDgm = SD of Xm; pef = physical effectiveness factor; peNDF = physically effective fiber.
      (% DM)
       >44 (mm)0.000.000.000.00
       33 to 44 (mm)4.504.802.530.39
       19 to 32.9 (mm)19.124.040.211.7
       8 to 19 (mm)50.556.146.262.0
       4 to 8 (mm)9.718.604.9014.6
       <4 (mm)16.26.546.2111.3
       Xm (mm)15.318.420.614.5
       SDgm2.041.781.771.81
       pef>4 (%)83.893.593.888.7
       pef>8 (%)74.184.988.974.2
       peNDF>4 (%)31.147.737.433.8
       peNDF>8 (%)27.543.335.528.2
      1 EE = ether extract.
      2 Fraction of forages at 0 h postfeeding; Xm = geometric mean particle size; SDgm = SD of Xm; pef = physical effectiveness factor; peNDF = physically effective fiber.
      Table 3Nutrient composition (g/kg DM), fatty acid content, and particle size distribution of diets based on red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage, fed to dairy cows in studies 1 and 2
      Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      Item
      EE = ether extract.
      Study 1Study 2
      HMLH50L50L60
      DM (g/kg)489481481453442439
      CP174165153172150152
      OM906906906919920913
      NDF383384376348355356
      ADF275281281233243248
      EE25.626.026.829.529.530.3
      Ash94.394.093.681.179.987.2
      Fatty acid (g/kg DM)
       C16:06.115.465.896.995.836.46
       C18:00.770.620.640.800.700.74
       C18:1C94.133.673.805.374.484.40
       C18:2n-63.853.533.716.315.885.71
       C18:3n-33.773.703.882.172.312.83
       Total fatty acids21.919.420.623.921.522.7
      Fraction
      Fraction of the diets at 0 h postfeeding; Xm = geometric mean particle size; SDgm = SD of Xm; pef = physical effectiveness factor; peNDF = physically effective fiber.
      (% DM)
       >44 (mm)0.000.000.000.000.000.00
       33 to 44 (mm)2.842.492.581.060.780.98
       19 to 32.9 (mm)16.015.314.415.815.617.0
       8 to 19 (mm)45.344.845.545.347.845.4
       4 to 8 (mm)10.29.319.9412.713.012.9
       <4 (mm)25.728.127.525.222.823.7
       Xm (mm)12.712.312.312.412.712.7
       SDgm2.192.212.192.142.092.13
       pef>4 (%)74.371.972.574.877.276.3
       pef>8 (%)64.162.662.562.164.263.4
       peNDF>4 (%)28.427.627.226.027.427.2
       peNDF>8 (%)24.524.123.521.622.822.6
      1 Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      2 EE = ether extract.
      3 Fraction of the diets at 0 h postfeeding; Xm = geometric mean particle size; SDgm = SD of Xm; pef = physical effectiveness factor; peNDF = physically effective fiber.

      Study 2

      Our alfalfa silage was lower in DM and OM and higher in NDF and ADF than the corn silage (Table 2). We observed that the CP concentration of the alfalfa silage was nearly twice that of the corn silage. In contrast, the ammonia-N content of our corn silage was 10.4 g/kg of total N higher than the alfalfa silage, and the pH of the alfalfa silage was 0.55 pH units lower. The lactate content of the alfalfa silage was 43.4 g/kg of DM higher than the corn silage, and the content of acetate was 9.4 g/kg of DM lower. We further found that the long-chain PUFA content was higher in the corn silage, with the concentration of C18:2 cis-9,cis-12 being 8.22 g of FA/kg of DM higher than the alfalfa silage. In contrast, the C18:3 cis-9,cis-12,cis-15 content of the corn silage was 4.32 g of FA/kg of DM lower than the alfalfa silage. We observed that the Xm of the PS of our alfalfa silage was higher than that of our corn silage. The DM, OM, NDF, ADF, and ether extract concentrations of the 3 TMR were similar, whereas the CP concentration varied across the treatments (Table 3). The total FA content in H50 was 1.8 g of FA/kg of DM higher than the other 2 diets. We found a tendency (P < 0.10) for the mean Xm, pef, and peNDF to be numerically higher in L50 or L60 compared with H50 (Supplemental Table S2, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21878619,
      • Sinclair L.
      JDS_Supplementary Tables (1).pdf. figshare. Journal contribution.
      ). In contrast, we found a tendency (P = 0.061) for a higher mean small PS fraction (<4 mm) in H50 compared with L50 or L60, whereas sampling time post-feeding did not affect the mean PS fractions of the diet except for the medium-length (8–19 mm) fraction, which increased (P = 0.050) until 8 h after feeding.

      In Situ Forage Degradability

      Study 1

      We found a tendency for a higher (P = 0.094) soluble fraction (a) of DM in the red clover compared with the grass silage (Table 4). In contrast, the red clover silage had a lower (P = 0.014) potentially degradable DM fraction (b) compared with the grass silage. However, we observed no effect (P > 0.05) of forage on the extent of degradation (a + b) or the rate (c) of the potentially degradable fraction of DM. The ED of DM was 7.12% higher (P = 0.030) in the red clover compared with the grass silage. The soluble fraction of the CP was 101 g/kg of DM higher (P = 0.011) in the grass silage compared with the red clover. In contrast, the potentially degradable fraction of CP was 109 g/kg of DM higher (P = 0.004) than the grass silage. However, we found no effect (P > 0.05) of forage on the extent of degradation or the rate of the potentially degradable fraction of CP, whereas the ED of the CP was 4.5% lower (P = 0.008) in the red clover than the grass silage.
      Table 4In situ DM and CP degradability coefficients of red clover, grass silage, alfalfa silage, and corn silage fed to dairy cows in studies 1 and 2
      Item
      a = soluble fraction; b = potentially rumen-degradable fraction; c = degradation rate of fraction b per hour; ED = effective rumen degradability at 8%/h rumen passage rate.
      Study 1Study 2
      Red clover silageGrass silageSEMP-valueAlfalfa silageCorn silageSEMP-value
      DM degradation coefficient (g/kg DM)
       a2782461.10.0942004060.1<0.001
       b5656110.80.0145804571.20.002
       a+b8448570.50.1247798630.6<0.001
       c0.080.070.0070.2430.090.060.0050.028
       ED5575200.80.0304986080.6<0.001
      CP degradation coefficient (g/kg total N)
       a3234241.60.0114285381.10.002
       b5494401.30.0044222721.1<0.001
       a+b8728640.50.3188508100.50.004
       c0.100.090.0090.4160.110.080.0080.045
       ED6276550.40.0086726730.30.843
      1 a = soluble fraction; b = potentially rumen-degradable fraction; c = degradation rate of fraction b per hour; ED = effective rumen degradability at 8%/h rumen passage rate.

      Study 2

      Our corn silage had a higher (P < 0.05) soluble fraction of DM compared with the alfalfa silage (Table 4). In contrast, the potentially degradable fraction of the DM was 123 g/kg of DM higher (P < 0.05) in the alfalfa compared with the corn silage. Likewise, the rate of degradation of the potentially degradable fraction of DM was higher (P < 0.05) in the alfalfa compared with the corn silage. We observed a difference in the ED of the DM, which was 22.1% higher (P < 0.001) in the corn than the alfalfa silage. The corn silage also had a higher (P < 0.05) soluble fraction of CP compared with the alfalfa silage. In contrast, the potentially degradable fraction of CP was 150 g of CP/kg of DM higher (P < 0.05) in the alfalfa compared with the corn silage. Similarly, the rate of degradation of the potentially degradable fraction of CP was higher (P < 0.05) in the alfalfa compared with the corn silage. However, the ED of the CP was comparable for both forages.

      Feed Intake and Animal Performance

      Study 1

      The DMI was 1.6 kg/d lower (P = 0.001) in cows receiving L than H or M (Table 5). However, diet had no effect on milk yield, ECM yield, or FCM yield, with means of 34.8, 34.9, and 36.7 kg/d, respectively. Similarly, diet did not (P > 0.05) affect milk protein, fat, or lactose contents. In contrast, the milk urea concentration was 4.4 mg/dL lower (P = 0.018) in cows receiving L than H, with those fed M having an intermediate value. Feed efficiency was 0.1 kg/kg of DM higher (P < 0.05) in cows fed L compared with M, with those receiving H having an intermediate value. Dietary treatment did not affect (P > 0.05) mean BW or BCS, although BCS change was numerically lower in cows fed L compared with M or H.
      Table 5Intake, milk performance, BW, and body condition of dairy cows fed diets based on red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage in studies 1 and 2
      Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      ItemStudy 1Study 2
      HMLSEMP-valueH50L50L60SEMP-value
      Intake (kg DM/d)25.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      25.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      23.5
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.330.00126.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      24.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      25.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.450.019
      Production (kg/d)
       Milk yield35.034.734.60.510.81040.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      39.8
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      38.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.430.010
       ECM yield34.835.034.80.540.93238.737.637.20.580.175
       FCM
      FCM = 4% fat-corrected milk yield.
      yield
      36.137.036.80.750.69239.138.138.30.920.703
      Composition (g/kg)
       Fat41.442.942.60.680.25238.338.339.40.860.553
       Protein32.031.631.60.230.42230.7
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      30.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      30.1
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.140.024
       Lactose45.245.645.40.150.16445.245.045.40.170.313
       Milk urea (mg/dL)21.8
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      19.7
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      17.4
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.020.01824.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      16.6
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      17.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.53<0.001
      Yield (kg/d)
       Fat1.451.481.470.0300.6921.561.521.530.0370.703
       Protein1.111.091.090.0150.3911.25
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.20
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0150.002
       Lactose1.581.581.570.0250.9381.85
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.80
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.77
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0230.047
      Feed efficiency
       Milk/DMI1.40
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.38
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.48
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0220.0091.571.641.560.0310.158
       ECM/DMI1.39
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.38
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.48
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0270.0301.481.561.500.0320.193
      Body performance
       BW (kg)6856806844.50.7137157087024.20.113
       BW change
      Change over the 28-d period.
      (kg/d)
      0.14−0.10−0.010.2460.7920.66−0.040.120.2170.070
       BCS2.542.612.570.0390.4772.682.652.640.0450.804
       BCS change
      Change over the 28-d period.
      −0.010.04−0.040.0610.6000.130.000.040.0560.293
      a,b Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1 Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      2 FCM = 4% fat-corrected milk yield.
      3 Change over the 28-d period.

      Study 2

      The DMI of cows receiving L50 was 2 kg/d lower (P = 0.019) than when receiving H50 (Table 5). Milk yield was 2 kg/d lower (P = 0.010) in cows receiving L60 compared with H50, but we found no difference (P > 0.05) in ECM or FCM yield between treatments. Diet also had no effect (P > 0.05) on milk fat or lactose contents. In contrast, milk protein concentration was 0.6 g/kg lower (P = 0.024) in cows receiving L60 than H50. We also observed that cows fed L60 had lower (P < 0.05) milk protein and lactose yields compared with those fed H50. The concentration of milk urea was 7.2 mg/dL higher (P < 0.001) in cows fed H50 compared with those fed L50 or L60. Feed efficiency was comparable across all 3 treatments. We found no effect (P > 0.05) of diet on mean BW or BCS, but we found a tendency (P = 0.070) for BW gain to be higher in cows receiving H50 than L50.

      Nutrient Intake and Apparent Total-Tract Digestibility

      Study 1

      We observed that DM, OM, N, and NDF intakes were lower (P < 0.05) in cows receiving L compared with H or M (Table 6). In contrast, the fecal outputs of DM, OM, and ADF were higher (P < 0.05) in cows fed L compared with those receiving H, whereas cows receiving L had a lower (P < 0.05) amount digested and a lower digestibility of DM, OM, N, NDF, and ADF compared with those fed either of the other 2 diets. In general, we found that the total-tract digestibility in cows receiving H or M was comparable, although total N digested was lower (P < 0.001) in animals when fed diet M compared with H. As a proportion of total N intake, N output in feces was 11 percentage units higher (P = 0.001) in cows fed L at 45.1% than those fed H or M. The NUE was approximately 5 percentage units higher in cows fed L than H or M.
      Table 6Intake, output, and apparent total-tract digestibility (kg/d) of nutrients and nitrogen partitioning (%) in dairy cows fed diets based on red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage in studies 1 and 2
      Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage. Measured using 12 cows for each study (4 cows for each treatment group).
      ItemStudy 1Study 2
      HMLSEMP-valueH50L50L60SEMP-value
      DM
       Intake25.4
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      25.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      23.6
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.4480.01826.3
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      23.8
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      25.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.5210.010
       Fecal output6.13
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      6.77
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      7.65
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.4080.0508.047.327.780.3880.433
       Digested19.3
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      18.5
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      16.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.402<0.00118.3
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      16.4
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      17.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.4410.028
       Digestibility (kg/kg)0.759
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.734
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.677
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.01440.0020.6950.6900.6910.01180.940
      N
       Intake0.71
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.67
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.58
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.012<0.0010.73
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.57
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.61
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.013<0.001
       Fecal output0.220.240.260.0160.3010.240.210.220.0110.170
       Milk output0.180.170.170.0030.5970.19
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.18
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.18
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0020.011
       Digested0.48
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.42
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.32
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.015<0.0010.49
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.36
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.31
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.028<0.001
       Digestibility (kg/kg)0.683
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.635
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.549
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.02180.0010.6690.6280.6340.01200.055
      OM
       Intake23.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      22.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      21.4
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.400.01824.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      21.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      22.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.480.011
       Fecal output5.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      5.72
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      6.49
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.3510.0476.966.336.700.3460.458
       Digested17.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      17.1
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      14.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.36<0.00117.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      15.5
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      16.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.420.031
       Digestibility (kg/kg)0.775
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.752
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.698
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.01370.0020.7130.7080.7090.01160.956
      NDF
       Intake9.72
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      9.68
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      8.86
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.1900.0069.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      8.43
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      8.90
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.1800.031
       Fecal output3.073.223.770.2200.0853.923.603.760.2050.556
       Digested6.65
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      6.46
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      5.09
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.211<0.0015.254.835.140.1570.176
       Digestibility (kg/kg)0.684
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.669
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.576
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.02050.0030.5750.5720.5770.01760.982
      ADF
       Intake6.987.086.620.1300.0506.155.766.180.1200.050
       Fecal output2.68
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.84
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      3.43
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.1930.0313.193.033.190.1600.718
       Digested4.31
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      4.25
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      3.20
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.166<0.0012.962.732.990.1180.278
       Digestibility (kg/kg)0.616
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.602
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.487
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.02420.0020.4820.4760.4850.02070.957
      N partitioning (%)
       Fecal31.7
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      36.5
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      45.1
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.180.00133.137.236.61.200.055
       NUE
      NUE = apparent nitrogen use efficiency (milk N/N intake).
      24.7
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      25.6
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      30.4
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.40<0.00126.5
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      32.6
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      29.9
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.77<0.001
      a,b Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1 Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage. Measured using 12 cows for each study (4 cows for each treatment group).
      2 NUE = apparent nitrogen use efficiency (milk N/N intake).

      Study 2

      The intakes of DM, OM, N, and NDF were lower (P < 0.05) in cows fed L50 compared with H50, with those fed L60 being intermediate, except for total N intake, which was similar in cows fed L50 or L60 at 0.59 kg/d (Table 6). We observed that the amounts of DM and OM digested were higher (P < 0.05) in cows fed H50 compared with L50, with those receiving L60 having intermediate values. Similarly, the amount of N digested was 0.14 kg/d higher (P < 0.001) in cows receiving H50 than L50 or L60. However, we found that dietary treatment had no effect (P > 0.05) on apparent whole-tract digestibility of DM, OM, N, NDF, or ADF.
      Milk N output was higher (P = 0.011) in cows receiving H50 compared with L60, but, as a proportion of total N intake, we found no effect (P > 0.05) of diet on fecal N output. In contrast, the apparent NUE was approximately 5 percentage units higher (P < 0.001) in cows receiving L50 or L60 compared with H50.

      Blood Plasma Metabolites

      Study 1

      Dietary treatment had no effect (P > 0.05) on the concentrations of plasma ammonia, glucose, or BHB (Table 7). In contrast, mean plasma urea concentration was lower (P = 0.011) in cows receiving L, but similar in those receiving H or M, and increased with time after feeding (Figure 1a).
      Table 7Plasma ammonia, BHB, and glucose concentrations in dairy cows fed diets based on red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage in studies 1 and 2
      Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage. D = main effect of diet; T = main effect of time; Int. = interaction between diet and time.
      ItemStudy 1Study 2
      HMLSEMP-valueH50L50L60SEMP-value
      DTIntDTInt
      Ammonia (μmol/L)35.235.634.42.360.690<0.0010.76840.241.441.74.750.7200.0040.972
      BHB (mmol/L)0.760.730.790.0650.630<0.0010.8560.490.490.530.0460.640<0.0010.087
      Glucose (mmol/L)3.723.673.680.1080.832<0.0010.4923.633.613.610.0680.952<0.0010.505
      1 Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage. D = main effect of diet; T = main effect of time; Int. = interaction between diet and time.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Plasma urea concentration in dairy cows fed a high- (H, ), medium- (M, ▪), or low-CP (L, ▴) diet based on red clover and grass silage (study 1, a), a high-CP diet with 50:50 ratio of alfalfa to corn silage (H50, ), or a low-CP diet with either a 50:50 (L50, ▪) or 60:40 (L60, ▴) ratio of alfalfa to corn silage (study 2, b). For study 1: pooled SEM = 0.276; diet, P = 0.011; time, P = 0.006; and diet × time, P = 0.598. For study 2; pooled SEM = 0.326; diet, P < 0.001; time, P < 0.001; and diet × time, P = 0.781. The arrow indicates the time of feeding. Error bars indicate SEM.

      Study 2

      Dietary treatment did not affect (P > 0.05) plasma ammonia, glucose, or BHB concentrations (Table 7). In contrast, plasma urea concentration was higher (P < 0.001) in cows fed H50 compared with L50 or L60, and increased immediately after feeding (Figure 1b).

      Milk Fatty Acid Profile

      Study 1

      The highest milk fat proportions of C8:0, C11:0, C12:0, C15:0, C15:1 cis-10, and C16:1 were observed in cows fed H, and lowest among those fed M (P < 0.05), except for C15:0 and C15:1 cis-10, which were lowest in milk from cows fed L (Table 8). In contrast, the milk fat proportion of C18:2 cis-9,cis-12 was higher (P = 0.002) in cows receiving L or M than H. Milk fat proportion of C18:1 trans-9 was higher (P < 0.05) in cows when fed M than L, whereas C18:1 trans-12 was higher in those fed L than H. We found that diet had no effect (P > 0.05) of diet on milk FA of chain length >C16:0 or C16:0 + 16:1, but those <C16:0 were higher (P = 0.040) in cows fed H compared with M. Also, dietary treatment did not affect the total milk fat proportions of SFA or MUFA, but the PUFA proportion was higher (P = 0.017) in cows receiving L than H. The total proportions of milk fat linear odd-chain FA or odd- and branched-chain FA (OBCFA) were higher (P < 0.05) in cows fed H compared with L.
      Table 8Milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows fed diets based on red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage in studies 1 and 2
      Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      Fatty acid (g/100 g)Study 1: Red clover and grass silage-based dietStudy 2: Alfalfa and corn silage-based diet
      HMLSEMP-valueH50L50L60SEMP-value
      C4:01.471.461.450.0200.8701.571.591.600.0220.517
      C6:01.391.371.390.0110.3481.391.401.400.0140.855
      C8:01.01
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.98
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.99
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0090.0340.990.980.980.0090.766
      C10:02.542.472.540.0480.4482.502.372.410.0400.091
      C11:00.31
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.29
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.30
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0050.0090.080.050.060.0070.083
      C12:03.39
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      3.18
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      3.29
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0490.0153.283.233.140.0440.085
      C13:00.090.090.080.0030.1090.110.100.100.0030.057
      C14:012.0811.7811.940.0880.07311.711.711.50.090.202
      C14:1 cis-91.251.201.230.0300.5301.211.321.220.0400.122
      C15:01.26
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.22
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.19
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0160.0141.251.211.220.0260.480
      C15:1 cis-100.23
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.21
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.21
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0010.0230.180.210.210.0200.256
      C16:039.4139.5239.550.2310.90438.838.939.60.270.126
      C16:1 cis-91.82
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.72
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1.73
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0300.0311.701.711.700.0500.970
      C17:00.520.520.520.0050.8770.480.470.500.0100.231
      C17:1 cis-100.280.270.270.0010.0530.260.270.260.0000.494
      C18:07.687.797.900.1300.4798.278.218.220.1250.926
      C18:1 trans-80.250.260.260.0100.6760.150.140.150.0090.816
      C18:1 trans-90.11
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.14
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.09
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0140.0340.360.360.330.0220.670
      C18:1 trans-100.991.011.040.0390.7020.590.570.610.0220.482
      C18:1 trans-110.720.750.740.0120.3450.990.960.920.0270.234
      C18:1 trans-120.15
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.16
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0030.0220.320.350.340.0110.115
      C18:1 cis-919.1519.5118.970.2200.22819.519.419.20.210.506
      C18:2 cis-9,cis-121.96
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0420.0022.082.202.180.0970.662
      C18:3 cis-9,cis-12,cis-150.270.270.270.0030.0970.540.520.500.0200.456
      CLA cis-9,trans-110.800.810.810.0100.6690.22
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.23
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.25
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0100.019
      CLA trans-10,cis-120.030.030.040.0020.2370.0270.0310.0320.00100.071
      C20:00.010.010.010.0010.9650.040.040.040.0010.534
      C20:3 cis-11,cis-14,cis-170.130.130.130.0030.9070.160.160.150.0040.240
      C21:00.060.050.060.0030.7890.070.060.060.0040.396
      C22:00.040.040.040.0010.5160.120.110.110.0030.090
      EPA
      EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid; C20:5 cis-5,cis-8,cis-11,cis-14,cis-17.
      0.120.110.120.0050.6150.130.140.110.0220.471
      DHA
      DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; C22:6 cis-4,cis-7,cis-10,cis-13,cis-16,cis-19.
      0.060.020.030.0220.3660.060.060.060.0020.257
      Summation
       <C1625.0
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      24.2
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      24.6
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.200.04024.324.223.80.150.116
       C16 + 16:141.241.341.30.240.98740.540.641.30.290.154
       >C1633.834.534.10.350.33435.235.234.90.320.737
       SFA
      Saturated fatty acids are defined as fatty acids with no double bonds.
      71.370.871.30.250.30170.766.771.02.240.326
       MUFA
      Monounsaturated fatty acids are defined as fatty acids with one double bond.
      25.025.224.70.240.30925.524.025.20.910.502
       PUFA
      Polyunsaturated fatty acids are defined as fatty acids with more than one double bond.
      3.81
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      3.99
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      4.03
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0560.0173.803.733.860.1570.837
       LOCFA
      LOCFA = linear odd-chain fatty acids: ∑LOCFA = (C11:0 + C13:0 + C15:0 + C17:0 + C21:0).
      2.24
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.17
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.14
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0210.0102.001.821.960.0680.148
       OBCFA
      OBCFA = linear odd- and branched-chain fatty acids: ∑OBCFA = (C11:0 + C13:0 + C15:0 + C15:1 + C17:0 + C17:1 + C21:0).
      2.75
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.65
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      2.62
      Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      0.0230.0012.442.272.430.0810.259
      a,b Means within a row within a study with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
      1 Study 1 based on red clover and grass silage; H = high- (175 g CP/kg DM), M = medium- (165 g CP/kg DM), and L = low-CP diets (150 g CP/kg DM). Study 2 based on alfalfa and corn silage; H50 = 175 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, L50 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 50:50 alfalfa to corn silage, and L60 = 150 g CP/kg DM with 60:40 alfalfa to corn silage.
      2 EPA = eicosapentaenoic acid; C20:5 cis-5,cis-8,cis-11,cis-14,cis-17.
      3 DHA = docosahexaenoic acid; C22:6 cis-4,cis-7,cis-10,cis-13,cis-16,cis-19.
      4 Saturated fatty acids are defined as fatty acids with no double bonds.
      5 Monounsaturated fatty acids are defined as fatty acids with one double bond.
      6 Polyunsaturated fatty acids are defined as fatty acids with more than one double bond.
      7 LOCFA = linear odd-chain fatty acids: ∑LOCFA = (C11:0 + C13:0 + C15:0 + C17:0 + C21:0).
      8 OBCFA = linear odd- and branched-chain fatty acids: ∑OBCFA = (C11:0 + C13:0 + C15:0 + C15:1 + C17:0 + C17:1 + C21:0).

      Study 2

      Diet had no effect on the milk FA profile except for CLA cis-9,trans-11, which was higher (P = 0.019) in cows when receiving L60 compared with H50, and intermediate in those fed L50 (Table 8). Similarly, we found that CLA trans-10,cis-12 tended (P = 0.071) to be higher in cows receiving L60 compared with those fed H50. Diet had no effect on the milk FA proportion of chain length higher or lower than C16:0, and C16:0 + 16:1. Similarly, we found no effect of dietary treatment on the total milk fat proportions of SFA, MUFA, PUFA, linear odd-chain FA, or OBCFA.

      DISCUSSION

      Feed Characteristics and Particle Size Distribution

      The chemical compositions of the forages used in both of our studies were comparable to previous work by
      • Broderick G.A.
      Utilization of protein in red clover and alfalfa silages by lactating dairy cows and growing lambs.
      and
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      . In line with
      • Broderick G.A.
      Utilization of protein in red clover and alfalfa silages by lactating dairy cows and growing lambs.
      , the grass silage had the highest concentration of NDF, although the content of CP was marginally lower than that of the red clover or alfalfa silage.
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      Milk production from silage: Comparison of grass, legume and maize silages and their mixtures.
      also reported that grass silage usually contains less CP but more fiber than legume forages, although factors such as variety, fertilizer application rate, and stage of maturity at harvest can all influence the content. According to
      • Broderick G.A.
      Utilization of protein in red clover and alfalfa silages by lactating dairy cows and growing lambs.
      , red clover silage contains 20 g/kg of DM less CP than alfalfa silage when harvested at a similar growth stage or NDF content. However, in our studies the CP content of red clover silage was only 10 g/kg of DM lower than the alfalfa silage. The higher pH of red clover and alfalfa silages compared with grass or corn silage is a common feature for legume forages due to their higher CP and ash content, and reflects a high buffering capacity with a low concentration of soluble CP (
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      • Davies L.J.
      • Kim E.J.
      Effects of mixtures of red clover and maize silages on the partitioning of dietary nitrogen between milk and urine by dairy cows.
      ). The alfalfa silage had the highest concentration of lactic acid, which is consistent with
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      , who reported a 7-g/kg DM higher content of lactate in alfalfa compared with corn or grass silage. Likewise,
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      • Davies L.J.
      • Kim E.J.
      Effects of mixtures of red clover and maize silages on the partitioning of dietary nitrogen between milk and urine by dairy cows.
      also noted a higher concentration of lactate and acetate in red clover than grass or corn silage. The PS distributions of our grass and corn silages were similar to that reported by
      • Tayyab U.
      • Wilkinson R.G.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Particle size distribution of forages and mixed rations, and their relationship with ration variability and performance of UK dairy herds.
      except for the long PS (mainly >44 mm), which was not found in our current study. The mean Xm and peNDF were highest in our alfalfa and grass silages, respectively, primarily due to the greater content of the long-PS (19 to 32.9 mm) fraction of our alfalfa silage and the higher NDF content of our grass silage.
      The nutrient composition of the TMR was similar in both of our studies except for CP, as we predicted, although we found a tendency for an interaction for pef>8mm in our study 1, which indicated that eating behavior differed between the dietary treatments (
      • Kononoff P.J.
      • Heinrichs A.J.
      • Lehman H.A.
      The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows.
      ;
      • Tayyab U.
      • Wilkinson R.G.
      • Charlton G.L.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Grass silage particle size when fed with or without maize silage alters performance, reticular pH and metabolism of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      ). The observation that the mean pef>8mm was lowest at 4 h and highest at 24 h after the morning feed for diet H in study 1 could be attributable to an increase in the consumption of large PS (>8 mm) during the first 4 h and short PS (<8 mm) between 4 and 24 h after feeding. In study 2, a numerically higher proportion of small-PS (<4 mm) and lower content of medium-PS (8–19 mm) fractions was the major factor causing the higher Xm, pef, and peNDF in H50 than the other 2 diets. Moreover, the consumption of medium (8–19 mm) fractions by our cows was lower during the first 8 h following the morning feeding in study 2, mainly due to the preference for a short PS (
      • Kononoff P.J.
      • Heinrichs A.J.
      • Lehman H.A.
      The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows.
      ).

      In Situ Degradability

      The soluble CP fraction in our grass silage was higher than the red clover silage, whereas the soluble DM was lower, a finding in agreement with
      • Purwin C.
      • Fijałkowska M.
      • Kowalik B.
      • Skórko-Sajko H.
      • Nogalski Z.
      • Pysera B.
      The effect of bale density and addition of formic acid on the in situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of lucerne, red clover and red fescue silages.
      , who examined the soluble fractions of different legumes and grass silages. Red clover silage has a higher concentration of potentially degradable CP compared with grass or other non-legume silages, as reported in a series of other studies (
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      • Evans R.T.
      • Scollan N.D.
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Merry R.J.
      • Wilkins R.J.
      Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function.
      ;
      • Purwin C.
      • Fijałkowska M.
      • Kowalik B.
      • Skórko-Sajko H.
      • Nogalski Z.
      • Pysera B.
      The effect of bale density and addition of formic acid on the in situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of lucerne, red clover and red fescue silages.
      ;
      • Damborg V.K.
      • Stødkilde L.
      • Jensen S.K.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      Protein value and degradation characteristics of pulp fibre fractions from screw pressed grass, clover, and lucerne.
      ). Similarly, several studies (
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      • Evans R.T.
      • Scollan N.D.
      • Moorby J.M.
      • Merry R.J.
      • Wilkins R.J.
      Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function.
      ;
      • Damborg V.K.
      • Stødkilde L.
      • Jensen S.K.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      Protein value and degradation characteristics of pulp fibre fractions from screw pressed grass, clover, and lucerne.
      ) have shown that red clover silage has a greater content of ED of CP than grass silage, with the higher content of NPN relative to neutral detergent insoluble CP being responsible for a rapid ruminal degradation of legume forage proteins. In contrast, red clover had a slightly higher ED of the DM compared with grass silage and therefore would be predicted to supply more rumen available energy for microbial growth (
      • Thomas C.
      Feed Into Milk: An Advisory Manual.
      ).
      The contents of the immediately soluble fractions of DM and CP were lower in our alfalfa silage, but the potentially degradable fractions and the rates of degradation for DM and CP were higher than corn silage, a finding in accordance with
      • Damborg V.K.
      • Stødkilde L.
      • Jensen S.K.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      Protein value and degradation characteristics of pulp fibre fractions from screw pressed grass, clover, and lucerne.
      . In comparison to alfalfa silage, red clover silage had a lower ruminal degradability of CP in our studies. This may be attributable to the presence of o-quinones that are synthesized by the enzyme PPO present in red clover, reducing protein degradation by creating a cross-linked complex with soluble and other dietary proteins inhibiting the function of proteases (
      • Broderick G.A.
      • Albrecht K.A.
      • Owens V.N.
      • Smith R.R.
      Genetic variation in red clover for rumen protein degradability.
      ).

      Intake and Animal Performance

      Our cows had a reduced DMI in both studies when the dietary CP concentration was decreased from 175 to 150 g/kg of DM, a finding consistent with other studies (
      • Alstrup L.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      • Hymøller L.
      • Larsen M.K.
      • Lund P.
      • Nielsen M.O.
      Milk production response to varying protein supply is independent of forage digestibility in dairy cows.
      ;
      • Giallongo F.
      • Harper M.T.
      • Oh J.
      • Lopes J.C.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Parys C.
      • Shinzato I.
      • Hristov A.N.
      Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows.
      ;
      • Barros T.
      • Quaassdorff M.A.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Colmenero J.J.O.
      • Bertics S.J.
      • Crump P.M.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Effects of dietary crude protein concentration on late-lactation dairy cow performance and indicators of nitrogen utilization.
      ). In a review of the literature,
      • Sinclair K.D.
      • Garnsworthy P.C.
      • Mann G.E.
      • Sinclair L.A.
      Reducing dietary protein in dairy cow diets: Implications for nitrogen utilization, milk production, welfare and fertility.
      reported that the DMI responds negatively when the concentration of dietary CP decreased between 220 to 140 g/kg of DM. The reduced DMI in cows fed diet L (study 1) or L50 (study 2) could be related to a lower supply of available N in the rumen, which depressed the activity of fiber-degrading bacteria, resulting in a lower intake. However, plasma urea concentrations in both of our studies were within the range generally considered to indicate that ruminal N supply was not limiting (
      • Reynolds C.K.
      • Kristensen N.B.
      Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants: An asynchronous symbiosis.
      ). In contrast,
      • Broderick G.A.
      • Faciola A.P.
      • Armentano L.E.
      Replacing dietary soybean meal with canola meal improves production and efficiency of lactating dairy cows.
      reported no difference in DMI in lactating dairy cows fed alfalfa and corn silage-based diets containing 170 to 150 g of CP/kg of DM. Likewise,
      • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
      • Broderick G.A.
      Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
      noted that dietary CP concentration ranging from 135 to 194 g of CP/kg of DM had no effect on DMI in Holstein dairy cows fed alfalfa and corn silage-based rations. Increasing the inclusion rate of alfalfa silage from 50 to 60% in our study 2 did not affect the DMI of the cows (L60), supporting the findings of
      • Arndt C.
      • Powell J.M.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.
      , who reported no difference in DMI when between 20 and 80% of corn silage was replaced with alfalfa silage. In contrast,
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      observed a decrease in DMI when alfalfa replaced 60% of the corn silage.
      Reducing dietary CP concentration has often been reported to reduce lactation performance (
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Giallongo F.
      Feeding protein to dairy cows—What should be our target?.
      ). For example,
      • Giallongo F.
      • Harper M.T.
      • Oh J.
      • Lopes J.C.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Parys C.
      • Shinzato I.
      • Hristov A.N.
      Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows.
      reported that decreasing the concentration of dietary CP from 165 to 145 g/kg of DM (resulting in a 5 to 10% deficiency in MP supply) reduced milk yield by approximately 4.3 kg/d when cows were fed a 1:2 (DM basis) alfalfa haylage and corn silage-based ration. In contrast, feeding a low-CP diet had no effect on milk yield or composition in our studies, supporting the findings of
      • Barros T.
      • Quaassdorff M.A.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Colmenero J.J.O.
      • Bertics S.J.
      • Crump P.M.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Effects of dietary crude protein concentration on late-lactation dairy cow performance and indicators of nitrogen utilization.
      , who also reported that feeding a low-CP (144 g of CP/kg of DM) alfalfa and corn silage-based diet (48:52 ratio, DM basis) had no effect on milk performance. We predicted that the supply of MP was similar across all the diets, which would be anticipated to result in a similar level of performance, irrespective of dietary CP content (
      • Thomas C.
      Feed Into Milk: An Advisory Manual.
      ). The exception was diet L in study 1, which was predicted to supply 95% of MP requirements, principally due to the high CP content of the grass silage and the subsequent difficulty in formulating a low-CP diet while providing sufficient supplementary RUP to meet the MP requirements. Despite this, performance was similar to animals fed H or M, which may possibly be attributable to inaccuracies in the prediction of MP requirements or to a greater mobilization of body tissues to meet nutrient demand. Body weight change did not, however, differ between treatments in our study 1, although the short-term changeover study design that we used may not have permitted an accurate assessment, and longer-term studies are required.
      Milk yield and milk protein concentration have been found to be reduced when dairy cows were fed a high compared with a low proportion of alfalfa-based diet (75:25 vs. 25:75 alfalfa to corn silage ratio;
      • Thomson A.L.
      • Humphries D.J.
      • Jones A.K.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      The effect of varying proportion and chop length of lucerne silage in a maize silage-based total mixed ration on diet digestibility and milk yield in dairy cattle.
      ), which supports our findings in study 2. The decrease in milk yield and milk protein content with increasing alfalfa proportion might have been due to the ME density of the alfalfa silage, which may have led to a lower supply of rumen available energy and subsequent MCP flow to the duodenum. However, several studies have reported that the replacement of corn with alfalfa silage has little consistent effect on milk yield or composition (
      • Hassanat F.
      • Gervais R.
      • Julien C.
      • Massé D.I.
      • Lettat A.
      • Chouinard P.Y.
      • Petit H.V.
      • Benchaar C.
      Replacing alfalfa silage with corn silage in dairy cow diets: Effects on enteric methane production, ruminal fermentation, digestion, N balance, and milk production.
      ;
      • Arndt C.
      • Powell J.M.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.
      ;
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      ). It has also been suggested that milk and milk protein yield could be improved by improving the AA profile of the MP, particularly the limiting essential AA such as lysine, methionine, or histidine (
      • Lee C.
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Heyler K.S.
      • Cassidy T.W.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Varga G.A.
      • Parys C.
      Effects of metabolizable protein supply and amino acid supplementation on nitrogen utilization, milk production, and ammonia emissions from manure in dairy cows.
      ;
      • Giallongo F.
      • Harper M.T.
      • Oh J.
      • Lopes J.C.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Parys C.
      • Shinzato I.
      • Hristov A.N.
      Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows.
      ).

      Whole-Tract Digestibility and N Efficiency

      The apparent whole-tract digestibilities of DM, OM, N, NDF, and ADF in both of our studies were similar to previous reports that have examined the effects of dietary CP concentration in red clover or alfalfa silage-based diets (
      • Broderick G.A.
      • Stevenson M.J.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Lobos N.E.
      • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
      Effect of supplementing rumen-protected methionine on production and nitrogen excretion in lactating dairy cows.
      ;
      • Lee C.
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Heyler K.S.
      • Cassidy T.W.
      • Long M.
      • Corl B.A.
      • Karnati S.K.R.
      Effects of dietary protein concentration and coconut oil supplementation on nitrogen utilization and production in dairy cows.
      ). Similar to other studies (
      • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
      • Broderick G.A.
      Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
      ;
      • Lee C.
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Cassidy T.W.
      • Heyler K.S.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Varga G.A.
      • de Veth M.J.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Parys C.
      Rumen-protected lysine, methionine, and histidine increase milk protein yield in dairy cows fed a metabolizable protein-deficient diet.
      ), the apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, N, NDF, and ADF were decreased when a low-CP diet (L) was fed to our dairy cows in study 1, but this was not observed for the low-protein diets (L50 and L60) in study 2, although we acknowledge that the low frequency of fecal sampling in our study could have influenced the results (
      • Morris D.L.
      • Rebelo L.R.
      • Dieter P.A.
      • Lee C.
      Validating intrinsic markers and optimizing spot sampling frequency to estimate fecal outputs.
      ). In contrast,
      • Niu M.
      • Appuhamy J.A.D.R.N.
      • Leytem A.B.
      • Dungan R.S.
      • Kebreab E.
      Effect of dietary crude protein and forage contents on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from dairy cows simultaneously.
      reported no change in the apparent digestibility of alfalfa and corn silage-based rations, except for OM and CP, which were decreased when the dietary concentration of CP was reduced from 185 to 152 and from 155 to 137 g/kg of DM, respectively.
      • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
      • Broderick G.A.
      Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
      suggested that a CP concentration below 165 g/kg of DM could contribute to a lower nutrient digestibility, supporting our finding from study 1.
      No difference was found in nutrient digestibility when alfalfa replaced corn silage at a higher rate (L50 and L60) in our study 2. Likewise,
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      and
      • Arndt C.
      • Powell J.M.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.
      reported that the replacement of corn with alfalfa silage did not affect apparent nutrient digestibility, except for fiber digestibility, which was increased by the inclusion rate of alfalfa silage (
      • Arndt C.
      • Powell J.M.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.
      ). Alternatively, feeding alfalfa-based diets may enhance the duodenal flow of indigestible fiber, resulting in an increased sloughing of endogenous cells from the intestinal wall, with a resultant reduction in the apparent digestibility of CP (
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      Milk production from silage: Comparison of grass, legume and maize silages and their mixtures.
      ).
      Several studies have reported that reducing dietary N intake can increase apparent NUE in lactating dairy cows when fed either alfalfa or alfalfa and corn silage-based rations (
      • Broderick G.A.
      • Faciola A.P.
      • Armentano L.E.
      Replacing dietary soybean meal with canola meal improves production and efficiency of lactating dairy cows.
      ;
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Heyler K.
      • Schurman E.
      • Griswold K.
      • Topper P.
      • Hile M.
      • Ishler V.
      • Fabian-Wheeler E.
      • Dinh S.
      Case Study: Reducing dietary protein decreased the ammonia emitting potential of manure from commercial dairy farms.
      ;
      • Niu M.
      • Appuhamy J.A.D.R.N.
      • Leytem A.B.
      • Dungan R.S.
      • Kebreab E.
      Effect of dietary crude protein and forage contents on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from dairy cows simultaneously.
      ), a finding in agreement with our results, where reducing dietary CP from 175 to 150 g/kg of DM while maintaining the MP supply increased NUE by approximately 25%. We found no difference in N output in milk or NUE when alfalfa replaced corn silage (L50 vs. L60) in our study 2, although numerically NUE was lower in cows fed L60 than L50. Increasing the rate of inclusion of alfalfa silage in corn silage-based diets up to 75 or 80%, has been shown to decrease NUE, which may be associated with a lower milk yield, oversupply of RDP, or limitation of rumen available energy in high alfalfa silage-based rations (
      • Arndt C.
      • Powell J.M.
      • Aguerre M.J.
      • Wattiaux M.A.
      Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.
      ;
      • Thomson A.L.
      • Humphries D.J.
      • Jones A.K.
      • Reynolds C.K.
      The effect of varying proportion and chop length of lucerne silage in a maize silage-based total mixed ration on diet digestibility and milk yield in dairy cattle.
      ).

      Plasma Metabolites and Milk Fatty Acid Profile

      We detected a reduction in plasma urea in cows receiving the low-CP diets (L, L50, or L60) compared with the high-CP diets (H or H50), which could be attributable to a lower content of degradable N in the rumen with these diets (
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Blake C.W.
      • Griffin P.
      • Jones G.H.
      The partial replacement of soyabean meal and rapeseed meal with feed grade urea or a slow-release urea and its effect on the performance, metabolism and digestibility in dairy cows.
      ;
      • Alstrup L.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      • Hymøller L.
      • Larsen M.K.
      • Lund P.
      • Nielsen M.O.
      Milk production response to varying protein supply is independent of forage digestibility in dairy cows.
      ). Moreover, the lower concentration of milk urea in cows receiving the low-CP diets in our studies was associated with a reduction in plasma urea content, which is supported by
      • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
      • Broderick G.A.
      Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
      , who reported that milk and plasma urea N were highly correlated (r = 0.83).
      • Alstrup L.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      • Hymøller L.
      • Larsen M.K.
      • Lund P.
      • Nielsen M.O.
      Milk production response to varying protein supply is independent of forage digestibility in dairy cows.
      reported no difference in plasma glucose or BHB concentrations in cows when fed a corn and grass silage-based low-CP diet (139 g/kg of DM) compared with a higher-CP diet (157 g CP/kg of DM), whereas plasma urea was reduced by 1.17 mmol/L. When we increased the proportion of alfalfa silage in the diet in study 2 (L50 vs. L60), this did not affect the concentration of plasma metabolites, although plasma BHB was numerically higher in cows when fed the high-alfalfa diet (L60). The highest concentration of plasma BHB was also associated with a high inclusion rate of alfalfa in the study of
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Edwards R.
      • Errington K.A.
      • Holdcroft A.M.
      • Wright M.
      Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
      , an effect that may partially be associated with a higher ruminal molar concentration of butyrate in cows fed this forage (
      • Hassanat F.
      • Gervais R.
      • Julien C.
      • Massé D.I.
      • Lettat A.
      • Chouinard P.Y.
      • Petit H.V.
      • Benchaar C.
      Replacing alfalfa silage with corn silage in dairy cow diets: Effects on enteric methane production, ruminal fermentation, digestion, N balance, and milk production.
      ).
      Milk FA profile principally depends on the FA composition of the diet consumed by the cow and the degree of biohydrogenation in the rumen (
      • Lashkari S.
      • Johansen M.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      • Jensen S.K.
      Milk fatty acid profile of dairy cows is affected by forage species, parity, and milking time.
      ). In our current studies the milk FA proportion of CLA cis-9,trans-11 was not affected by dietary CP concentration, but CLA cis-9,trans-11 increased with alfalfa inclusion rate (L60 vs. H50) in study 2. Increased milk FA proportion of CLA cis-9,trans-11 can be associated with a greater dietary supply of C18:2 cis-9,cis-12 or C18:3 cis-9,cis-12,cis-15, although the dietary concentrations of these fatty acids were similar in L50 and L60. The lower proportion of CLA in the milk fat of cows fed H50 may also partly be due to a higher DM and fiber intake, which increased the passage rate and reduced the time available for ruminal biohydrogenation.
      The highest proportion of total milk PUFA (mainly C18:2 cis-9,cis-12) and C18:1 trans-12 in the milk from cows fed the low-CP diet (L) in our study 1 could be related to a lower dietary supply of RDP that might have reduced rumen microbial metabolism and subsequent biohydrogenation of long-chain FA in the rumen (
      • Leduc M.
      • Gervais R.
      • Tremblay G.F.
      • Chiquette J.
      • Chouinard P.Y.
      Milk fatty acid profile in cows fed red clover- or alfalfa-silage based diets differing in rumen-degradable protein supply.
      ). Moreover, forage type also had an influence on milk FA content (
      • Lashkari S.
      • Johansen M.
      • Weisbjerg M.R.
      • Jensen S.K.
      Milk fatty acid profile of dairy cows is affected by forage species, parity, and milking time.
      ). For example, milk from cows fed red clover and grass silage-based diets in our study 1 had higher total PUFA than milk from cows fed the alfalfa and corn silage-based rations in study 2. The higher proportion of milk PUFA in lactating cows fed red clover-based diets could be due to the action of PPO reducing the ruminal biohydrogenation of long-chain FA (
      • Van Ranst G.
      • Lee M.R.F.
      • Fievez V.
      Red clover polyphenol oxidase and lipid metabolism.
      ). The exact mechanism by which PPO reduces FA biohydrogenation in the rumen is unclear (
      • Lee M.R.F.
      Forage polyphenol oxidase and ruminant livestock nutrition.
      ), but it has been suggested that encapsulation of plant lipids in a phenol-protein complex reduces the accessibility of lipids to microbial lipolysis, lowering biohydrogenation (
      • Van Ranst G.
      • Lee M.R.F.
      • Fievez V.
      Red clover polyphenol oxidase and lipid metabolism.
      ). In contrast,
      • Lee C.
      • Hristov A.N.
      • Heyler K.S.
      • Cassidy T.W.
      • Long M.
      • Corl B.A.
      • Karnati S.K.R.
      Effects of dietary protein concentration and coconut oil supplementation on nitrogen utilization and production in dairy cows.
      and
      • Giallongo F.
      • Harper M.T.
      • Oh J.
      • Lopes J.C.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Parys C.
      • Shinzato I.
      • Hristov A.N.
      Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows.
      reported a lower concentration of PUFA in milk fat when an alfalfa and corn silage-based low-CP diet (145 to 148 g/kg of DM) was fed to dairy cows, an effect that was attributed to the inclusion of dietary heat-treated or expeller soybean meal, which contained more saturated fat. The low-CP diets in our current studies also contained more RUP sources, which may have altered the milk FA profile.
      Milk OBCFA and <C16 FA in ruminants have been suggested to be markers that could be used to predict MCP synthesis (
      • Vlaeminck B.
      • Fievez V.
      • Cabrita A.R.J.
      • Fonseca A.J.M.
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review.
      ). In our study 1, the yields of milk <C16 (mainly C8:0, C11:0, and C12:0) and OBCFA (mainly C15:0 and C15:1) were lower when fed L or M compared with H, a finding in agreement with previous work (
      • Vlaeminck B.
      • Fievez V.
      • Cabrita A.R.J.
      • Fonseca A.J.M.
      • Dewhurst R.J.
      Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review.
      ;
      • Giallongo F.
      • Harper M.T.
      • Oh J.
      • Lopes J.C.
      • Lapierre H.
      • Patton R.A.
      • Parys C.
      • Shinzato I.
      • Hristov A.N.
      Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows.
      ;
      • Leduc M.
      • Gervais R.
      • Tremblay G.F.
      • Chiquette J.
      • Chouinard P.Y.
      Milk fatty acid profile in cows fed red clover- or alfalfa-silage based diets differing in rumen-degradable protein supply.
      ), where the microbial synthesis of OBCFA was decreased when diets low in RDP were fed. Indeed, a positive relationship has been found between dietary N supply and MCP synthesis in ruminants (
      • Sinclair L.A.
      • Garnsworthy P.C.
      • Newbold J.R.
      • Buttery P.J.
      Effects of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release in diets with a similar carbohydrate composition on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep.
      ).

      CONCLUSIONS

      Reducing the dietary CP concentration from 175 to 150 g/kg of DM in a red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage-based diet that were predicted to meet or be marginally deficient in MP supply decreased DMI but had no effect on milk yield or composition, whereas increasing the proportion of alfalfa in a low-CP diet from 50 to 60% of the forage DM reduced milk yield and milk protein content but not DMI or ECM yield. The apparent whole-tract nutrient digestibility was decreased by reducing dietary CP in a red clover and grass silage-based diet but not in an alfalfa and corn silage-based diet. Importantly, feeding a low-CP diet based on either red clover and grass silage or alfalfa and corn silage improved the apparent nitrogen use efficiency in dairy cows by approximately 25%.

      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

      The authors are grateful to S. J. Williams, J. Clarke, J. Helen, and T. Almekinders (Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, UK) for technical assistance during the sampling periods. The Agricultural and Horticulture Development Board (Warwickshire, UK) is also gratefully acknowledged for funding the study. The authors have not stated any conflicts of interest.

      REFERENCES

        • Alstrup L.
        • Weisbjerg M.R.
        • Hymøller L.
        • Larsen M.K.
        • Lund P.
        • Nielsen M.O.
        Milk production response to varying protein supply is independent of forage digestibility in dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2014; 97 (24835962): 4412-4422
        • AOAC International
        Official Methods of Analysis.
        19th ed. AOAC International, 2012
        • Arndt C.
        • Powell J.M.
        • Aguerre M.J.
        • Wattiaux M.A.
        Performance, digestion, nitrogen balance, and emission of manure ammonia, enteric methane, and carbon dioxide in lactating cows fed diets with varying alfalfa silage-to-corn silage ratios.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2015; 98 (25465537): 418-430
        • ASABE
        Method of determining and expressing particle size of chopped forage materials by screening.
        ANSI/ASAE. 2007; S424: 663-665
        • Barros T.
        • Quaassdorff M.A.
        • Aguerre M.J.
        • Colmenero J.J.O.
        • Bertics S.J.
        • Crump P.M.
        • Wattiaux M.A.
        Effects of dietary crude protein concentration on late-lactation dairy cow performance and indicators of nitrogen utilization.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2017; 100 (28501404): 5434-5448
        • Broderick G.A.
        Utilization of protein in red clover and alfalfa silages by lactating dairy cows and growing lambs.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2018; 101 (29224883): 1190-1205
        • Broderick G.A.
        • Albrecht K.A.
        • Owens V.N.
        • Smith R.R.
        Genetic variation in red clover for rumen protein degradability.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004; 113: 157-167
        • Broderick G.A.
        • Faciola A.P.
        • Armentano L.E.
        Replacing dietary soybean meal with canola meal improves production and efficiency of lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2015; 98 (26074230): 5672-5687
        • Broderick G.A.
        • Stevenson M.J.
        • Patton R.A.
        • Lobos N.E.
        • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
        Effect of supplementing rumen-protected methionine on production and nitrogen excretion in lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2008; 91 (18292265): 1092-1102
        • Damborg V.K.
        • Stødkilde L.
        • Jensen S.K.
        • Weisbjerg M.R.
        Protein value and degradation characteristics of pulp fibre fractions from screw pressed grass, clover, and lucerne.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018; 244: 93-103
        • Dewhurst R.J.
        Milk production from silage: Comparison of grass, legume and maize silages and their mixtures.
        Agric. Food Sci. 2013; 22: 57-69
        • Dewhurst R.J.
        • Davies L.J.
        • Kim E.J.
        Effects of mixtures of red clover and maize silages on the partitioning of dietary nitrogen between milk and urine by dairy cows.
        Animal. 2010; 4 (22444126): 732-738
        • Dewhurst R.J.
        • Evans R.T.
        • Scollan N.D.
        • Moorby J.M.
        • Merry R.J.
        • Wilkins R.J.
        Comparison of grass and legume silages for milk production. 2. In vivo and in sacco evaluations of rumen function.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2003; 86 (12939085): 2612-2621
        • Feng S.
        • Lock A.L.
        • Garnsworthy P.C.
        Technical Note: A rapid lipid separation method for determining fatty acid composition of milk.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2004; 87: 3785-3788
        • Ferguson J.D.
        • Galligan D.T.
        • Thomsen N.
        Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1994; 77 (7814740): 2695-2703
        • Giallongo F.
        • Harper M.T.
        • Oh J.
        • Lopes J.C.
        • Lapierre H.
        • Patton R.A.
        • Parys C.
        • Shinzato I.
        • Hristov A.N.
        Effects of rumen-protected methionine, lysine, and histidine on lactation performance of dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2016; 99 (27060815): 4437-4452
        • Hassanat F.
        • Gervais R.
        • Julien C.
        • Massé D.I.
        • Lettat A.
        • Chouinard P.Y.
        • Petit H.V.
        • Benchaar C.
        Replacing alfalfa silage with corn silage in dairy cow diets: Effects on enteric methane production, ruminal fermentation, digestion, N balance, and milk production.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96 (23684039): 4553-4567
        • Hristov A.N.
        • Giallongo F.
        Feeding protein to dairy cows—What should be our target?.
        in: Proc. 23rd Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, Fort Wayne, IN. Ohio State University, 2014: 75-84
        • Hristov A.N.
        • Heyler K.
        • Schurman E.
        • Griswold K.
        • Topper P.
        • Hile M.
        • Ishler V.
        • Fabian-Wheeler E.
        • Dinh S.
        Case Study: Reducing dietary protein decreased the ammonia emitting potential of manure from commercial dairy farms.
        Prof. Anim. Sci. 2015; 31: 68-79
        • Huntington J.A.
        • Givens D.I.
        Studies on in situ degradation of feeds in the rumen: 1. Effect of species, bag mobility and incubation sequence on dry matter disappearance.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1997; 64: 227-241
        • Jenkins T.C.
        Technical note: Common analytical errors yielding inaccurate results during analysis of fatty acids in feed and digesta samples.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2010; 93 (20172237): 1170-1174
        • Johansen M.
        • Lund P.
        • Weisbjerg M.R.
        Feed intake and milk production in dairy cows fed different grass and legume species: A meta-analysis.
        Animal. 2018; 12 (28560944): 66-75
        • Johnston D.J.
        • Laidlaw A.S.
        • Theodoridou K.
        • Ferris C.P.
        Performance and nutrient utilisation of dairy cows offered silages produced from three successive harvests of either a red clover–perennial ryegrass sward or a perennial ryegrass sward.
        Ir. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020; 59: 42-55
        • Kononoff P.J.
        • Heinrichs A.J.
        • Lehman H.A.
        The effect of corn silage particle size on eating behavior, chewing activities, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2003; 86 (14594254): 3343-3353
        • Lashkari S.
        • Johansen M.
        • Weisbjerg M.R.
        • Jensen S.K.
        Milk fatty acid profile of dairy cows is affected by forage species, parity, and milking time.
        in: Proc. 70th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, Ghent, Belgium. Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2019: 713
        • Lavery A.
        • Ferris C.P.
        Proxy measures and novel strategies for estimating nitrogen utilisation efficiency in dairy cattle.
        Animals (Basel). 2021; 11 (33572868): 343
        • Leduc M.
        • Gervais R.
        • Tremblay G.F.
        • Chiquette J.
        • Chouinard P.Y.
        Milk fatty acid profile in cows fed red clover- or alfalfa-silage based diets differing in rumen-degradable protein supply.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017; 223: 59-72
        • Lee C.
        • Hristov A.N.
        • Cassidy T.W.
        • Heyler K.S.
        • Lapierre H.
        • Varga G.A.
        • de Veth M.J.
        • Patton R.A.
        • Parys C.
        Rumen-protected lysine, methionine, and histidine increase milk protein yield in dairy cows fed a metabolizable protein-deficient diet.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2012; 95 (22863104): 6042-6056
        • Lee C.
        • Hristov A.N.
        • Heyler K.S.
        • Cassidy T.W.
        • Lapierre H.
        • Varga G.A.
        • Parys C.
        Effects of metabolizable protein supply and amino acid supplementation on nitrogen utilization, milk production, and ammonia emissions from manure in dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2012; 95 (22916930): 5253-5268
        • Lee C.
        • Hristov A.N.
        • Heyler K.S.
        • Cassidy T.W.
        • Long M.
        • Corl B.A.
        • Karnati S.K.R.
        Effects of dietary protein concentration and coconut oil supplementation on nitrogen utilization and production in dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2011; 94 (22032378): 5544-5557
        • Lee M.R.F.
        Forage polyphenol oxidase and ruminant livestock nutrition.
        Front. Plant Sci. 2014; 5 (25538724): 694
        • Lee M.R.F.
        • Theobald V.J.
        • Tweed J.K.S.
        • Winters A.L.
        • Scollan N.D.
        Effect of feeding fresh or conditioned red clover on milk fatty acids and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2009; 92 (19233806): 1136-1147
        • Lock A.L.
        • Teles B.M.
        • Perfield II, J.W.
        • Bauman D.E.
        • Sinclair L.A.
        A conjugated linoleic acid supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating sheep.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2006; 89 (16606723): 1525-1532
        • MAFF
        The Analysis of Agricultural Materials.
        Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1986
        • Maulfair D.D.
        • Zanton G.I.
        • Fustini M.
        • Heinrichs A.J.
        Effect of feed sorting on chewing behavior, production, and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2010; 93 (20855013): 4791-4803
        • Mead R.
        • Curnow R.N.
        • Hasted A.M.
        Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology.
        Chapman and Hall, 1993
        • Moorby J.M.
        • Ellis N.M.
        • Davies D.R.
        Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and corn silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2016; 99 (27474976): 7982-7992
        • Moorby J.M.
        • Lee M.R.F.
        • Davies D.R.
        • Kim E.J.
        • Nute G.R.
        • Ellis N.M.
        • Scollan N.D.
        Assessment of dietary ratios of red clover and grass silages on milk production and milk quality in dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2009; 92 (19233807): 1148-1160
        • Morris D.L.
        • Rebelo L.R.
        • Dieter P.A.
        • Lee C.
        Validating intrinsic markers and optimizing spot sampling frequency to estimate fecal outputs.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2018; 101 (30007807): 7980-7989
        • Niu M.
        • Appuhamy J.A.D.R.N.
        • Leytem A.B.
        • Dungan R.S.
        • Kebreab E.
        Effect of dietary crude protein and forage contents on enteric methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from dairy cows simultaneously.
        Anim. Prod. Sci. 2016; 56: 312-321
        • Olmos Colmenero J.J.
        • Broderick G.A.
        Effect of dietary crude protein concentration on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2006; 89 (16606741): 1704-1712
        • Ørskov E.R.
        • McDonald I.
        The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage.
        J. Agric. Sci. 1979; 92: 499-503
        • Purwin C.
        • Fijałkowska M.
        • Kowalik B.
        • Skórko-Sajko H.
        • Nogalski Z.
        • Pysera B.
        The effect of bale density and addition of formic acid on the in situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of lucerne, red clover and red fescue silages.
        J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2014; 23: 177-184
        • Reynolds C.K.
        • Kristensen N.B.
        Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants: An asynchronous symbiosis.
        J. Anim. Sci. 2008; 86 (17940161): E293-E305
        • Schwab C.G.
        • Broderick G.A.
        A 100-Year Review: Protein and amino acid nutrition in dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 2017; 100 (29153157): 10094-10112
        • Sinclair L.
        JDS_Supplementary Tables (1).pdf. figshare. Journal contribution.
        • Sinclair K.D.
        • Garnsworthy P.C.
        • Mann G.E.
        • Sinclair L.A.
        Reducing dietary protein in dairy cow diets: Implications for nitrogen utilization, milk production, welfare and fertility.
        Animal. 2014; 8 (24290203): 262-274
        • Sinclair L.A.
        • Blake C.W.
        • Griffin P.
        • Jones G.H.
        The partial replacement of soyabean meal and rapeseed meal with feed grade urea or a slow-release urea and its effect on the performance, metabolism and digestibility in dairy cows.
        Animal. 2012; 6 (22558962): 920-927
        • Sinclair L.A.
        • Edwards R.
        • Errington K.A.
        • Holdcroft A.M.
        • Wright M.
        Replacement of grass and maize silages with lucerne silage: Effects on performance, milk fatty acid profile and digestibility in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
        Animal. 2015; 9 (26242305): 1970-1978
        • Sinclair L.A.
        • Garnsworthy P.C.
        • Newbold J.R.
        • Buttery P.J.
        Effects of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release in diets with a similar carbohydrate composition on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep.
        J. Agric. Sci. 1995; 124: 463-472
        • Sinclair L.A.
        • Hart K.J.
        • Wilkinson R.G.
        • Huntington J.A.
        Effects of inclusion of whole-crop pea silages differing in their tannin content on the performance of dairy cows fed high or low protein concentrates.
        Livest. Sci. 2009; 124: 306-313
        • Sjaunja L.O.
        • Bævre L.
        • Junkkarinen L.
        • Pedersen J.
        • Setälä J.
        Gaillon P. Chabert Y. A Nordic Proposal for an Energy Corrected Milk (ECM) Formula. Paris, France. EAAP publication 50. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (PUDOC), 1991
        • Tayyab U.
        • Wilkinson R.G.
        • Charlton G.L.
        • Reynolds C.K.
        • Sinclair L.A.
        Grass silage particle size when fed with or without maize silage alters performance, reticular pH and metabolism of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows.
        Animal. 2019; 13: 524-532
        • Tayyab U.
        • Wilkinson R.G.
        • Reynolds C.K.
        • Sinclair L.A.
        Particle size distribution of forages and mixed rations, and their relationship with ration variability and performance of UK dairy herds.
        Livest. Sci. 2018; 217: 108-115
        • Thomas C.
        Feed Into Milk: An Advisory Manual.
        1st ed. Nottingham University Press, 2004
        • Thomson A.L.
        • Humphries D.J.
        • Jones A.K.
        • Reynolds C.K.
        The effect of varying proportion and chop length of lucerne silage in a maize silage-based total mixed ration on diet digestibility and milk yield in dairy cattle.
        Animal. 2017; 11 (28651664): 2211-2219
        • Van Keulen J.
        • Young B.A.
        Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1977; 44: 282-287
        • Van Ranst G.
        • Lee M.R.F.
        • Fievez V.
        Red clover polyphenol oxidase and lipid metabolism.
        Animal. 2011; 5 (22439947): 512-521
        • Van Soest P.J.
        • Robertson J.B.
        • Lewis B.A.
        Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74 (1660498): 3583-3597
        • Vlaeminck B.
        • Fievez V.
        • Cabrita A.R.J.
        • Fonseca A.J.M.
        • Dewhurst R.J.
        Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006; 131: 389-417
        • Westreicher-Kristen E.
        • Blank R.
        • Metges C.C.
        • Susenbeth A.
        Protein value of diets for dairy cows with different proportions of crude protein originating from red clover silage versus soybean meal.
        Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018; 245: 126-135