Advertisement
Research-Article| Volume 71, ISSUE 6, P1598-1608, June 1988

Download started.

Ok

Multiphasic Analysis of Lactation Curves in Dairy Cattle

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Supported in part by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station and Wageningen Agricultural University.
    ,
    Author Footnotes
    2 Reprint requests.
    M. Grossman
    Footnotes
    1 Supported in part by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station and Wageningen Agricultural University.
    2 Reprint requests.
    Affiliations
    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana 61801
    Search for articles by this author
  • W.J. Koops
    Affiliations
    Department of Animal Breeding, Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Supported in part by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station and Wageningen Agricultural University.
    2 Reprint requests.
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      A multiphasic function that considers milk yield to result from an accumulation from more than one phase of lactation was used to describe a lactation curve. Estimated mean milk yields from purebred Dutch Friesian Black and White cows for 15 test d with 20-d intervals, starting from 10 d in milk, were fitted by nonlinear regression using the sum of logistic functions: yt=i=1n{aibi[1tanh2(bi(tci))]} where yt is milk yield (kg) at time t (t = days in milk); n is number of lactation phases (n = 1, 2, 3); tanh is the hyperbolic tangent; for each phase i, a function of parameters aibi is maximum (peak) yield, ci is time of peak yield, and 2bi−1 is duration, defined as days required to attain about 75% of asymptotic total yield during that phase. Initial yield and 305-d yield were additional functions of parameters.
      The diphasic function (n = 2) was chosen to estimate parameters for lactation curves for purebred Dutch Friesian Black and White and purebred Meuse-Rhine-Yssel Red and White cows. Effects of breed, parity, and length of lactation on functions of estimates for these parameters were analyzed. Relationships between the two phases of lactation were examined using correlations between functions of estimates for parameters within and between phases.

      References

        • Batra T.R.
        Comparison of two mathematical models in fitting lactation curves for pure line and crossbred dairy cows.
        Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1986; 66: 405
        • Causton D.R.
        A biologist's mathematics.
        Edward Arnold Publ. Ltd., London, UK1977
        • Cobby J.M.
        • Le Du Y.L.P.
        On fitting curves to lactation data.
        Anim. Prod. 1978; 26: 127
        • Dhanoa M.S.
        A note on an alternative form of the lactation model of Wood.
        Anim. Prod. 1981; 32: 349
        • Fischer A.
        Untersuchungen an württember gischen Fleckviehkühen über die Form der Lakta- tionskurve und deren Beeinflussung durch nichter bliche Faktoren [Research with Wurttemburg Spotted Mountain cows on the shape of the lacta tion curve and how it may be influenced by nongenetic factors].
        Züchtungskunde. 1958; 30: 296
        • Graven H.O.
        • Baptist R.
        Breeding for persistency of milk yield.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1976; 3: 27
        • Grossman M.
        • Kopps W.J.
        Multiphasic analysis of growth curves in chickens.
        Poultry Sci. 1988; 67: 33
        • Grossman M.
        • Kuck A.L.
        • Norton H.W.
        Lactation curves of purebred and crossbred dairy cattle.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1986; 69: 195
        • Johansson I.
        • Hanson A.
        Causes of variation in milk and butterfat yield of dairy cows.
        K. Landbruksakad. Tidskr. 1940; 79: 127
        • Koops W.J.
        Multiphasic growth curve analysis.
        Growth. 1986; 50: 169
        • Koops W.J.
        • Grossman M.
        • Michalska E.
        Multiphasic growth curve analysis in mice.
        Growth. 1987; 51: 372
        • Nelder J.A.
        Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multi-factor response functions.
        Bio metrics. 1966; 22: 128
        • Rowlands G.J.
        • Lucey S.
        • Russell A.M.
        A comparison of different models of the lactation curve in dairy cattle.
        Anim. Prod. 1982; 35: 135
        • Sanders H.G.
        The analysis of the lactation curve into maximum yield and persistency.
        J. Agric. Sci. 1930; 20: 145
      1. S.A.S. Institute Inc, 1985 Page 597 SAS User's guide: statistics, version 5 edition SAS Inst. Inc Cary, NC

        • Schmidt G.H.
        Biology of lactation.
        W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA1971 (Page 186)
        • Stülkner J.
        • Fuchs W.
        A comparison of different measures of persistency with special respect to variation of test-day milk yields.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987; 16: 305
      2. Wilmink, J.B.M. De correctie van melkproduktiegegevens voor leeftijd, seizoen en lactatiestadium (with English summary). [The adjustment of milk production records for age, season of calving and stage of lactation.] Rep B- 243 IVO- “Schoonoord,” Zeist Neth

        • Wilmink J.B.M.
        Comparison of different methods of predicting 305-day milk yield using means calculated from within herd lactation curves.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987; 17: 1
        • Wilmink J.B.M.
        Efficiency of selection for different cumulative milk, fat and protein yields in first lactation.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1987; 17: 211
        • Wood P.D.P.
        Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle.
        Nature (London). 1967; 216: 164
        • Wood P.D.P.
        A note on the repeatability of parameters of the lactation curve in cattle.
        Anita. Prod. 1970; 12: 535