Advertisement
Article| Volume 74, ISSUE 4, P1277-1283, April 1991

Download started.

Ok

Effect of Dry Period Length on Milk Production in Subsequent Lactation

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The effect of planned dry period lengths of 4,7, and 10 wk on subsequent lactational yield was estimated with 366 cows in an experiment in which dry period was manipulated independently of milk yield prior to drying off. In two herds, all three treatments were compared within herd; in six herds, two treatments were compared within herd. Compared with a 7-wk planned dry period, a 3-wk decrease lowered the level of milk production by 2.8 kg of 4% FCM/d in the first 84 d of the subsequent lactation, whereas a 3-wk increase raised the level of milk production by .5 kg/d In the first 168 d of the subsequent lactation, the difference between 4-wk and 7-wk planned dry periods was 2.7 kg/d, and the difference between 7- and 10-wk periods was .4 kg/d. There was no indication of interaction among planned dry period length and lactation number, days open in previous lactatian, previous milk yield, breed, or health status with respect to effect on subsequent lactational yield.

      Key words

      Abbreviation Key:

      RDM (Red Danish breed), SDM (Danish Black and White breed), SFU (Scandinavian feed units)

      References

        • Coppock C.E.
        • Everett R.W.
        • Natzke R.P.
        • Ainslie H.R.
        Effect of dry period length on Holstein milk production and selected disorders at partorition.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1974; 57: 712
      1. Dias, H. P., W. W. Swett, and W. R. Harvey. 1961. Relation of heait girth to weight in Holsteins and Jerseys. Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 194.

        • Davies F.M.
        • Allaire F.R.
        Dry period to maximize milk production over two consecutive lactations.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1982; 65: 136
        • Enevoldsen C.
        • Gröhn Y.T.
        • Thysen I.
        Physical injuries in dairy cows: associations with season, cow characteristics, disease and production.
        in: Thrusfield M. Proc. Annu. Mtg. Soc. Vet. Epidemiology Prev. Med. Belfast, Ireland1990: 133
        • Keown J.F.
        • Everett R.W.
        Effect of days carried calf, days dry, and weight of first calf heifers on yield.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1986; 69: 1891
        • Kristensen T.
        Methods for estimation of body conditions of dairy cows.
        in: Østergaard V. Hindhede J. Research in cattle production systems. Natl. Inst. Anim. Sci., Copenhagen, Denmark1985: 59 (Rep. 615)
        • Oltenacu P.A.
        • Rounsaville T.R.
        • Milligan R.A.
        • Foote R.H.
        Systems analysis for designing reproductive management programs to increase production and profit in dairy herds.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1981; 64: 2096
      2. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. 1985. SAS Inst, Inc, Cary, NC.

        • Schaeffer L.R.
        • Henderson C.R.
        Effects of days dry and days open on Holstein milk production.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1972; 55: 107
        • Smith A.
        • Wheelock J.V.
        • Dood F.H.
        The effect of milking throughout pregnaney on milk secretion in the succeeding lactation.
        J. Dairy Res. 1967; 34: 145
        • Swanson E.W.
        Comparing continuous milking with sixty day dry periods in successive lactations.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1965; 48: 1205
        • Wilton J.W.
        • Burnside E.B.
        • Rennie J.C.
        The effects of days dry and days opea on the milk and butterfat production of Holstein-Friesian cattle.
        Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1967; 47: 85
        • Wood P.D.P.
        The effect of the diy period on the subsequent lactation in three half-sib groups of British Friesians.
        J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.). 1977; 89: 737