Advertisement
Article| Volume 74, ISSUE 12, P4297-4304, December 1991

Download started.

Ok

Effect of Forage Source on Retention of Digesta Markers Applied to Corn Gluten Meal and Brewers Grains for Heifers

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
    J.M. Lopez-Guisa
    Footnotes
    1 Present address: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
    Affiliations
    US Dairy Forage Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Madison, WI 53706
    Search for articles by this author
  • L.D. Satter
    Affiliations
    US Dairy Forage Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Madison, WI 53706
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Effect of forage source on retention time of dietary protein supplements in the rumen was measured, and solid and liquid markers of digesta passage were compared. Two markers for liquid, two for each of the forages, and two for each of the supplemental proteins were compared for estimating retention time. Eight Holstein heifers were allocated to a single-reversal design with two periods of 29 d each. Heifers were fed either alfalfa hay or corn husks and leaves combined with one of two resistant protein sources: corn gluten meal or wet brewers grains. Average rumen liquid retention times, measured with Co-EDTA or Cr-EDTA, were similar (16.2 to 16.9 h). Liquid retention times differed when alfalfa or corn residue was fed (14.1 and 18.9 h, respectively). Rumen retention times were similar for Sm and Ce (24.9 to 26.3 h) and across markers for forage sources (25.1 to 26.1 h). Total tract mean retention time was higher for corn residue than for hay (57.8 vs. 48.8 h). Rumen retention times for La and Yb (27.1 and 26.0 h) applied to protein sources were similar and were not different when applied to corn gluten meal or brewers grains (26.3 and 26.8 h). Forage source did not have an effect on the retention time of protein supplements. Low daily DMI of 2.22 and 1.91% of BW for hay and corn residue diets explain the rather long retention times of the protein supplements. Both Co-EDTA and Cr-EDTA were affective as liquid phase markers.

      Key words

      Abbreviation key:

      AH (alfalfa hay), CGM (com gluten meal), CHL (com husks and leaves), TMRT (total mean retention time), WBG (wet brewers grains)

      References

        • Association of Official Analytical Chemists
        Official methods of analysis.
        13th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC1980
        • Binnerts W.T.
        • Van’t Klooster A.T.
        • Frens A.M.
        Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments.
        Vet. Rec. 1968; 82: 470
        • Cochran W.G.
        • Cox G.M.
        Experimental designs.
        2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY1957
      1. Combs, D. K. 1985. An evaluation of markers and techniques used to measure nutrient digestion in ruminants. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.

        • Crooker B.A.
        • Clark J.H.
        • Shanks R.D.
        Rare earth elements as markers for rate of passage measurements of individual feedstuffs through the digestive tract of ruminants.
        J. Nutr. 1982; 112: 1353
        • Downes A.M.
        • MacDonald I.W.
        The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as soluble marker.
        Br. J. Nutr. 1964; 18: 153
        • Ellis W.C.
        • Huston J.E.
        144Ce-144Pr as a paniculate digesta flow marker in ruminants.
        J. Nutr. 1968; 95: 67
        • Evans E.
        An evaluation of the relationships between dietary parameters and rumen liquid turnover rate.
        Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1981; 61: 91
        • Faichney G.C.
        • Griffiths D.A.
        Behavior of solute and particle markers in the stomach of sheep given a concentrate diet.
        Br. J. Nutr. 1978; 40: 71
      2. Goering, K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). ARS-USDA Handbook 379. Washington, DC.

        • Grovum W.L.
        • Williams V.J.
        Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological rele-vance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of markers in faeces.
        Br. J. Nutr. 1973; 30: 313
        • Hartnell G.F.
        • Satter L.D.
        Extent of particulate marker (samarium, lanthanum and cerium) movement from one digesta particle to another.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 48: 375
        • Hartnell G.F.
        • Satter L.D.
        Determination of rumen fill, retention time and ruminal turnover rates of ingesta at different stages of lactation in dairy cows.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 48: 381
      3. Kawas, J. R. 1983. Significance of fiber level on nutritive value of alfalfa hay-based diets for ruminants. PhD. Diss., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.

        • Kennedy P.M.
        Influences of cold exposure on digestion of organic matter, rates of passage of digesta in the gastrointestinal tract, and feeding and rumination behavior in sheep given four forage diets in the chopped, or ground and pelleted form.
        Br. J. Nutr. 1985; 53: 159
      4. Lascano, C. 1979. Determination of grazed forage voluntary intake. Ph.D. Diss., Texas A&M Univ., College Station.

        • Lucas Jr., H.L.
        Design and analysis of feeding experiments with milking dairy cattle. Mimeo Ser. No. 18.
        Inst. Sat, North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh1974
        • Mudgal V.D.
        • Dixon R.M.
        • Kennedy P.M.
        • Milligan L.P.
        Effect of two intake levels on retention times of liquid, particle and microbial markers in the rumen of sheep.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1982; 544: 1051
        • Poppi D.P.
        • Minson D.J.
        • Temouth J.H.
        Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. I. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time in the reticulorumen.
        Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1981; 32: 99
        • Poppi D.P.
        • Minson D.J.
        • Temouth J.H.
        Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. III. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles.
        Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1981; 32: 123
      5. Prange, R. W. 1981. Kinetics of digesta passage in lactating dairy cows. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.

        • Prigge E.C.
        • Baker M.J.
        • Varga G.A.
        Comparative digestion, rumen fermentation and kinetics of forage diets by steers and wethers.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1984; 59: 237
      6. SAS® Users Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. 1985. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

        • Stem M.D.
        • Ortega M.E.
        • Satter L.D.
        Retention time in the rumen and degradation of protein supplements fed to lactating dairy cattle.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1983; 66: 1264
        • Teeter R.G.
        • Owens F.N.
        Characteristics of water soluble markers for measuring rumen liquid volume and dilution rate.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1983; 56: 717
        • Teeter R.G.
        • Owens F.N.
        • Mader T.L.
        Ytterbium chloride as a marker for particulate matter in the rumen.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1984; 58: 465
        • Trotter T.
        • Olson R.
        • Brown B.
        • Klopfenstein T.
        • Brink D.
        • Stock R.
        Effects of rumensin in high fiber growing rations. Nebraska Beef Cattle Rep. EC 81-218.
        Univ, Nebraska, Lincoln1981
      7. Uden, P. 1978. Comparative studies on rate of passage, particle size and rate of digestion in ruminants, equines, rabbits and man. Ph.D. Diss., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.

        • Uden P.
        • Colucci P.E.
        • Van Soest P.J.
        Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta rate of passage studies.
        J. Sci. Food Agric. 1980; 31: 625
        • Varga G.A.
        • Prigge E.C.
        Influence of forage species and level of intake on ruminal turnover rates.
        J. Anint. Sci. 1982; 55: 1498
        • Wheeler W.E.
        • Dinius D.A.
        • Coombe J.B.
        Digestibility, rate of digestion and ruminoreticu-turn parameters of beef steers fed low quality rough-ages.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 49: 1357