Factors Affecting Calculation and Use of Conversion Equations for Genetic Merit of Dairy Bulls

References

1. Banos, G. 1992. Report on COPA/INTERBULL joint project. Proc. INTERBULL Sem. on Sire Eval., Neustift, Austria, June 7–8, 1992. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 7. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet., SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

   • Google Scholar
2. • Banos G.
   A theoretical comparison between direct and indirect conversions of dairy bull evaluations.
   J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 1993; 110: 57
   • Scopus (2)
   • PubMed
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
3. • Calo L.L.
   • McDowell R.E.
   • VanVleck L.D.
   • Miller P.D.
   Genetic aspects of beef production among Holstein-Friesians pedigree selected for milk production.
   J. Anim. Sci. 1973; 37: 676
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar

4. International Bull Evaluation Service. 1990. Recommended procedures for international use of sire proofs. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 4. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet., SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

   • Google Scholar

5. International Bull Evaluation Service. 1992. Sire evaluation procedures for dairy production traits practiced in various countries 1992. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 5. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet., SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

   • Google Scholar

6. Mattalia, S., and B. Bonaiti. 1993. Use of full sibs families to estimate the ‘a’ coefficients of conversion formulas between countries. Proc. Open Session IN- TERBULL Annu. Mtg., Aarhus, Denmark, Aug. 19–20, 1993. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 8. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet., SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

   • Google Scholar
7. • Philipsson J.
   Standards and procedures for international genetic evaluations of dairy cattle.
   J. Dairy Sci. 1987; 70: 418
   • Scopus (11)
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
8. • Powell R.L.
   • Sieber M.
   Direct and indirect conversion of bull evaluations for yield traits between countries.
   J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 1138
   • Scopus (17)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
9. • Powell R.L.
   • Wiggans G.R.
   • Robinson J.A.B.
   Comparison of US and Canadian animal model evaluations of the same Ayrshire cows.
   J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74 (Abstr.): 232
   • Google Scholar
10. • Robinson J.A.B.
    • Wiggans G.R.
    Comparison of Canadian and US animal model bull evaluations of Ayrshire and Jersey yield traits.
    J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74 (Abstr.): 232
    • Google Scholar
11. • Schaeffer L.R.
    Model for international evaluation of dairy sires.
    Livest. Prod. Sci. 1985; 12: 105
    • Scopus (47)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar

12. Schaeffer, L. R. 1993. Multi-trait, across country evaluation of dairy sires. Proc. Opening Session INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Aarhus, Denmark, Aug. 19–20, 1993. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 8. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet., SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

    • Google Scholar
13. • Wiggans G.R.
    • Misztal I.
    • Van L.D.
    • Vleck
    Implementation of an animal model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States.
    J. Dairy Sci. 1988; 71: 54
    • Scopus (108)
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
14. • Wiggans G.R.
    • VanRaden P.M.
    Method and effect of adjustment for heterogeneous variance.
    J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 4350
    • Scopus (96)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
15. • Wiggans G.R.
    • VanRaden P.M.
    • Powell R.L.
    A method for combining United States and Canadian bull evaluations.
    J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 2834
    • Scopus (9)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar