Advertisement
Article| Volume 77, ISSUE 9, P2695-2703, September 1994

Principal Descriptors of Body Condition Score in Holstein Cows

  • James D. Ferguson
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Center for Animal Health and Productivity, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square 19348
    Search for articles by this author
  • David T. Galligan
    Affiliations
    Center for Animal Health and Productivity, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square 19348
    Search for articles by this author
  • Neal Thomsen
    Affiliations
    Center for Animal Health and Productivity, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square 19348
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      The objective of this study was to assess objectively the ability of observers to assess body condition of dairy cows. Four observers independently assigned a body condition score (five-point scale, .25 increments) and described the appearance of seven body regions of 225 Holstein cows. Areas described were the thurl region, ischial and ileal tuberosities, ilio-sacral and ischio-coccygeal ligaments, transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae, and spinous processes of the lumbar vertebrae. An absolute body condition score was designated for each cow based on the modal body condition score for all observers. If there was no modal body condition score, the mean score was used for the absolute body condition score. Statistical analysis of principal components was used to examine the relationship between body region description and absolute body Condition score. Descriptions of body regions were highly correlated across all absolute body condition scores. Four principal component vectors explained 83.6% of the variation of the body region correlation matrix. The first principal latent vector accounted for 55% of the variation and was uniformly correlated with all body regions. Analysis of variance of first principal latent vector as the dependent variable and absolute body condition score as the class variable indicated that body condition could be separated into .25 units between 2.5 and 4.0, inclusively. Below 2.5 and >4.0, body condition could only be separated by .5 units. Distinct changes in specific body regions were associated with change in absolute body condition score. Observers agreed with the absolute score 58.1% of the time, deviating by .25 units 32.6% of the time. A body condition score can be given to a cow based on principal descriptors of specific body regions between 2.5 and 4.0 by .25 units.

      Key words

      Abbreviation key:

      BCS (body condition score), MBCS (modal body condition score), PCV (principal component vector)

      References

        • Butler-Hogg B.W.
        • Wood J.D.
        • Bines J.A.
        Fat partitioning in British Friesian cows: the influence of physiological state on dissected body composition.
        J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.). 1985; 104: 519
        • Dunteman G.H.
        Principal Components Analysis.
        Sage Publ., Newbury, CA1989
      1. Earle, D. 1985. Condition scoring of dairy cows. Agnote 2907/85, Dep. Agric. Rural Affairs, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

        • Edmonson A.J.
        • Lean I.J.
        • Weaver L.D.
        • Farver T.
        • Webster G.
        A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1989; 72: 68
        • Elanco Products
        • Company
        Body Condition Scoring.
        Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN1989
        • Garnsworthy P.C.
        • Topps J.H.
        The effect of body condition of dairy cow at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets.
        Anim. Prod. 1982; 35: 113
      2. Heinrichs, A. J., and V. A. Ishler. 1989. Body condition scoring as a tool for dairy herd management. Ext. Circ. 363. Penn State Univ., Coll. Agric. Coop. Ext., University Park.

        • Lean I.J.
        • Edmonson A.J.
        • Versteeg J.
        Belschner A. Body Condition Scoring of Dairy Cattle. The Upjohn Co., Anim. Health Div, Kalamazoo, MI1989
        • Morrow D.A.
        Fat cow syndrome.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1976; 59: 1625
        • National Research Council
        Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.
        6th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC1989
        • Otto K.A.
        • Ferguson J.D.
        • Fox D.G.
        • Sniffen C.J.
        Relationship between body condition score and composition of ninth to eleventh rib tissue in Holstein dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1991; 74: 852
        • Patton R.A.
        • Bucholtz H.F.
        • Schmidt M.K.
        • Hall F.M.
        Body condition scoring—a management tool.
        Dep. Anim. Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing1988
        • Perkins B.L.
        • Smith R.D.
        • Sniffen C.J.
        Body condition scoring: a useful tool for dairy herd management. Dairy management fact sheet.
        Coop. Ext., Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY1985
      3. SAS® User's Guide: SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6 Edition. 1987. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

        • Waltner S.S.
        • McNamara J.P.
        • Hillers J.K.
        Relationships of body condition score to production variables in high producing Holstein dairy cattle.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1993; 76: 3410
        • Wildman E.E.
        • Jones G.M.
        • Wagner P.E.
        • Boman R.L.
        • Troutt Jr., H.F.
        • Lesch T.N.
        A dairy cow body condition scoring system and its relationship to selected production characteristics.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1982; 65: 495
        • Wright I.A.
        • Russell A.J.F.
        Estimation in vivo of the chemical composition of the bodies of mature cows.
        Anim. Prod. 1984; 38: 33