Advertisement
Article| Volume 80, ISSUE 8, P1656-1665, August 1997

Download started.

Ok

Effects of Dietary Forage Source and Amount of Forage Addition on Intake, Milk Yield, and Digestion for Lactating Dairy Cows

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Animal and Dairy Science Department.
    J.W. West
    Footnotes
    1 Animal and Dairy Science Department.
    Affiliations
    The University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton 31793-0748
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Animal and Dairy Science Department.
    G.M. Hill
    Footnotes
    1 Animal and Dairy Science Department.
    Affiliations
    The University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton 31793-0748
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    2 USDA, Agricultural Research Service.
    R.N. Gates
    Footnotes
    2 USDA, Agricultural Research Service.
    Affiliations
    The University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton 31793-0748
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    3 Statistical and Computer Services.
    B.G. Mullinix
    Footnotes
    3 Statistical and Computer Services.
    Affiliations
    The University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Station, Tifton 31793-0748
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Animal and Dairy Science Department.
    2 USDA, Agricultural Research Service.
    3 Statistical and Computer Services.
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Lactating cows were used to determine the effects of increasing forage content from alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hay or Tifton 85 bermudagrass (Cynodon sp.) hay on dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield, and nutrient digestion. Forage proportions and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content of diets were (dry basis) 1) 45% corn (Zea mays L.) silage (control), 33.5% NDF; 2) 15% bermudagrass hay and 30% corn silage, 39.5% NDF; 3) 30% bermudagrass hay and 15% corn silage, 46.6% NDF; 4) 15% alfalfa hay and 30% corn silage, 35.5% NDF; or 5) 30% alfalfa hay and 15% corn silage, 33.5% NDF. The DMI was greater with alfalfa diets than with bermudagrass diets, with low hay diets than with high hay diets, and with the control diet than with the hay diets. Digestibility of NDF in bermudagrass diets was greater than that in alfalfa diets, in high hay diets than in low hay diets, and in hay diets than in the control diet. In vitro NDF digestion was most rapid for bermudagrass hay, intermediate for corn silage, and slowest for alfalfa hay. Results suggest that NDF from bermudagrass was digested more completely and rapidly than was NDF from corn silage or alfalfa, which improved the rate of passage despite the high NDF content of diets containing bermudagrass. Milk yield followed trends for DMI. The control diet and diets containing alfalfa elicited the greatest DMI and milk yield, but DMI per 100 kg of body weight for Holsteins was equal for diets containing either bermudagrass or alfalfa. High quality bermudagrass can be used in rations for lactating dairy cows.

      Key words

      Abbreviation Key:

      AHD (alfalfa hay diets), BHD (bermudagrass hay diets), HHD (high hay diets), LHD (low hay diets), NDFI% (NDF intake as a percentage of BW), SP (standardization period), TP (treatment period)

      References

        • Burton G.W.
        • Gates R.N.
        • Hill G.M.
        Registration of ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass.
        Crop Sci. 1993; 33: 644
        • Dado R.G.
        • Allen M.S.
        Intake limitations, feeding behavior, and rumen function of cows challenged with rumen fill from dietary fiber or inert bulk.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1995; 78: 118
        • Gill S.S.
        • Conrad H.R.
        • Hibbs J.W.
        Relative rate of in vitro cellulose disappearance as a possible estimator of digestible dry matter intake.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1969; 52: 1687
        • Goetsch A.L.
        • Galyean M.L.
        Ruthenium phenanthroline, dysprosium and ytterbium as particulate markers in beef steers fed an all-alfalfa hay diet.
        Nutr. Rep. Int. 1983; 27: 171
        • Grovum W.L.
        • Williams V.J.
        Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in feces.
        Br. J. Nutr. 1973; 30: 313
        • Hartnell G.F.
        • Satter L.D.
        Determination of rumen fill, retention time, and ruminal turnover rates of ingesta at different stages of lactation in dairy cows.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 48: 381
        • Hill G.M.
        • Gates R.N.
        • Burton G.W.
        Forage quality and grazing steer performance from Tifton 85 and Tifton 78 bermudagrass pastures.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1993; 71: 3219
        • Johnson T.R.
        • Combs D.K.
        Effects of rumen bulk on dry matter intake in early and midlactation cows fed diets differing in forage content.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 508
        • Mertens D.R.
        Using neutral detergent fiber to formulate dairy rations and estimate the net energy content of forages.
        in: Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf., Syracuse, NY. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY1983: 60
        • Mertens D.R.
        Predicting intake and digestibility using mathematical models of ruminal function.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1987; 64: 1548
        • Mertens D.R.
        Critical conditions in determining detergent fibers.
        in: Proc. Natl. Forage Testing Assoc. Forage Analysis Workshop. Natl. Forage Testing Assoc, Milwaukee, WI1992: 5
        • Mertens D.R.
        Nonstructural and structural carbohydrates.
        in: Van Horn H.H. Wilcox C.J. Large Dairy Herd Management. Am. Dairy Sci. Assoc., Champaign, IL1992: 219
        • Mertens D.R.
        • Ely L.O.
        A dynamic model of fiber digestion and passage in the ruminant for evaluating forage quality.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1979; 49: 1085
        • Moore J.E.
        • Mott G.O.
        Recovery of residual organic matter from in vitro digestion of forages.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1974; 57: 1258
        • National Research Council
        Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle.
        6th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC1989
        • Rayburn E.B.
        • Fox D.G.
        Variation in neutral detergent fiber intake of Holstein cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1993; 76: 544
        • Ruiz T.M.
        • Bernal E.
        • Staples C.R.
        • Sollenberger L.E.
        • Gallaher R.N.
        Effect of dietary neutral detergent fiber concentration and forage source on performance of lactating cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1995; 78: 305
        • Shaver R.D.
        • Satter L.D.
        • Jorgensen N.A.
        Impact of forage fiber content on digestion and digesta passage in lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1988; 71: 1556
        • Smith L.W.
        • Goering H.K.
        • Waldo D.R.
        • Gordon C.H.
        In vitro digestion rate of forage cell wall components.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1971; 54: 71
        • Udén P.
        • Colucci P.E.
        • Van Soest P.J.
        Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies.
        J. Sci. Food Agric. 1980; 31: 625
        • Van Soest P.J.
        Symposium on factors influencing the voluntary intake of herbage by ruminants: voluntary intake in relation to chemical composition and digestibility.
        J. Anim. Sci. 1965; 24: 834
        • Waldo D.R.
        Effect of forage quality on intake and forageconcentrate interactions.
        J Dairy Sci. 1986; 69: 617
        • Woodford J.A.
        • Jorgensen N.A.
        • Barrington G.P.
        Impact of dietary fiber and physical form on performance of lactating dairy cows.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1986; 69: 1035