Advertisement
Article| Volume 80, ISSUE 8, P1795-1800, August 1997

Download started.

Ok

A Computationally Feasible Test Day Model for Genetic Evaluation of Yield Traits in the United States1

Open ArchiveDOI:https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76113-7
A Computationally Feasible Test Day Model for Genetic Evaluation of Yield Traits in the United States1
Previous ArticleRealized Versus Expected Gains in Milk and Fat Production of Holstein Cattle, Considering the Effects of Days Open1
Next ArticleEstimation of (Co)Variance Components for Jersey Type Traits Using a Repeatability Model
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      A multitrait analysis of test day yields is proposed that includes 60 traits [3 yield traits (milk, fat, and protein), 2 parity groups (first and later) per yield trait, and 10 stages of lactation per parity]. To reduce the computations needed for the 60 traits, test day effects are estimated within the herd before analysis across herds, the rank of the genetic (co)variance matrix is reduced, a canonical transformation is used with missing values replaced by their expectations, and a repeatability model is applied to allow inclusion of parities after second. Historical 305-d records are included through their correlations with test day effects. Possible benefits from this model include 1) more accurate estimation of environmental effects from including the influence of particular days of recording, 2) optimal use of information from all test days (especially for lactations with long intervals from calving to first test or between tests), 3) improved accuracy of evaluations for component yields through contributions from information for milk yield, and 4) greater stability of bull evaluations from accounting for genetic differences among daughters in the shape of lactation curve and maturity rate.

      Key words

      Abbreviation key:

      TD (test day)

      References

      1. Cooperative Extension. 1995. The Sire Report, July 1995, Northeast A.I. Multiple Trait Cow & Sire Evaluation. Cornell Coop. Ext., Dep. Anim. Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.

        • Ducrocq V.
        • Besbes B.
        Solution of multiple trait animal models with missing data on some traits.
        J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 1993; 110: 81
        • Everett R.W.
        • Schmidt F.
        • Wadell L.H.
        A test-day model for monitoring management and genetics in dairy cattle.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1994; 77 (Abstr.): 267
        • García-Cortés L.A.
        • Moreno C.
        • Varona L.
        • Rico M.
        • Altarriba J.
        (Co)variance component estimation of yield traits between different lactations using an animal model.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1995; 43: 111
        • Gengler N.
        • Misztal I.
        Approximation of reliability for multiple-trait animal models with missing data by canonical transformation.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1996; 79: 317
        • Graser H.-U.
        • Tier B.
        Applying the concept of number of effective progeny to approximate accuracies of predictions derived from multiple trait analyses.
        in: Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breeding Genet, Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia, 121997: 547
        • Jamrozik J.
        • Schaeffer L.R.
        • Dekkers J.C.M.
        Random regression models for production traits in Canadian Holsteins.
        in: Proc. Open Session INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, June 23–24, 1996. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden1996: 124 (No. 14)
        • Jamrozik J.
        • Schaeffer L.R.
        • Dekkers J.C.M.
        Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test day yields and random regression model.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1997; 80: 1217
        • Johnson D.L.
        Estimation of lactation yield from repeated measures of test day yields.
        Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1996; 56: 16
        • Jones L.P.
        • Goddard M.E.
        Five years experience with the animal model for dairy evaluations in Australia.
        in: Proc. 4th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Edinburgh, Scotland, XIII1990: 382
        • Lin C.Y.
        • Smith S.P.
        Transformation of multitrait to unitrait mixed model analysis of data with multiple random effects.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1990; 73: 2494
        • Meyer K.
        Genetic parameters for dairy production of Australian Black and White cows.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1985; 12: 205
        • Meyer K.
        • Graser H.-U.
        • Hammond K.
        Estimates of genetic parameters for first lactation test day production of Australian Black and White cows.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1989; 21: 177
        • Pösö J.
        • Mäntysaari E.A.
        • Kettunen A.
        Estimation of genetic parameters of test day production in Finnish Ayrshire cows.
        in: Proc. Open Session INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, June 23–24, 1996. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden1996: 45 (No. 14)
        • Ptak E.
        • Schaeffer L.R.
        Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows.
        Livest. Prod. Sci. 1993; 34: 23
        • Reents R.
        • Dekkers J.C.M.
        • Schaeffer L.R.
        Genetic evaluation for somatic cell score with a test day model for multiple lactations.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1995; 78: 2858
        • Reents R.
        • Dopp L.
        Genetic evaluation for dairy production traits with a test day model for multiple lactations.
        in: Proc. Open Session INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, June 23–24, 1996. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden1996: 113 (No. 14)
        • Rekaya R.
        • Béjar R.
        • Carabaño M.J.
        • Alenda R.
        Genetic parameters for test day measurements in Spanish Holstein-Friesian.
        in: Proc. Open Session INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 7-8, 1995. Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden1995 (No. 11)
        • Schaeffer L.R.
        • Sullivan B.P.
        Genetic evaluation of dairy goats using test day yields.
        in: Proc. 5th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 181994: 182
        • Strandén I.
        • Mäntysaari E.A.
        Animal model evaluation in Finland: experience with two algorithms.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75: 2017
        • Swalve H.H.
        The effect of test day models on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1995; 78: 929
        • Swalve H.H.
        Test day models in the analysis of dairy production data—a review.
        Arch. Anim. Breed. 1995; 38: 591
        • Van Tassell C.P.
        • Quaas R.L.
        • Everett R.W.
        Parameter estimates for 305-day ME records and 305-day testday residual records.
        J. Dairy Sci. 1992; 75 (Abstr.): 251
        • Wiggans G.R.
        Procedures for calculating lactation records.
        Natl. Coop. Dairy Herd Impr. Progr. Handbook. Fact Sheet G-1. Ext. Serv., USDA, Washington, DC1985
        • Wiggans G.R.
        • Goddard M.E.
        A computationally feasible test day model with separate first and later lactation genetic effects.
        Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1996; 56: 19

      Article info

      Publication history

      Accepted: February 10, 1997
      Received: July 15, 1996

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76113-7

      Copyright

      © 1997 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      User license

      Elsevier user license |
      How you can reuse Information Icon
      Elsevier user license

      Permitted

      For non-commercial purposes:

      • Read, print & download
      • Text & data mine
      • Translate the article

      Not Permitted

      • Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
      • Redistribute or republish the final article
      • Sell or re-use for commercial purposes

      Elsevier's open access license policy

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX